An Act to consolidate the Statutes relating to Criminal Law.
Part 1 Preliminary and interpretation
pt 1, hdgs: Subst 1929 No 2, sec 21 (a).
Short title
1 Name of Act
This Act is the Crimes Act 1900.s 1, hdg: Am 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [1].s 1: Am 1924 No 10, sec 26 (b). Subst 1929 No 2, sec 21 (a). Am 1929 No 31, sec 2 (b); 1937 No 35, Second Sch; 1946 No 43, sec 4 (a); 1951 No 31, secs 2 (b) (ii) (h) (ii) (l) (ii), 4 (i) (ii), 5 (c), 6 (d) (ii); 1955 No 16, sec 4 (l); 1967 No 77, sec 2 (a); 1973 No 38, Sch 2; 1974 No 50, sec 4 (a); 1979 No 72, Sch 1; 1979 No 95, Sch 1 (1); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (1); 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (1); 1982 No 116, Schs 2 (1), 3 (1); 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (1); 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (1); 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (1); 1984 No 22, Sch 1 (1); 1985 No 38, Sch 1; 1986 No 133, sec 4 (a); 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (1); 1987 No 184, Schs 1 (1), 3 (1); 1987 No 238, Sch 1; 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (1); 1988 No 81, Schs 1 (1), 3 (1), 5 (1); 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (1); 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (1); 1989 No 40, Sch 2 (1); 1989 No 62, Sch 1 (1); 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (1); 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (1); 1990 No 5, sec 3 (a); 1990 No 11, Sch 2; 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (1); 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (1); 1990 No 101, Sch 1 (1); 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (1); 1992 No 83, Sch 1 (1); 1993 No 64, Sch 1 (1); 1994 No 83, Sch 1 (1); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (1); 1995 No 49, Sch 1 [1] [2]; 1995 No 63, Sch 2 [1] [2]; 1996 No 6, Sch 1; 1996 No 65, Sch 1 [1]; 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [1]; 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [1]. Subst 1997 No 147, Sch 2.8.
Repeals and savings
2 Repeals and savings
s 2, hdg: Ins 1929 No 2, sec 21 (b).(1) The Acts mentioned in the First Schedule hereto are, to the extent therein expressed, hereby repealed, except as to offences committed and things done or commenced before the passing of this Act, which shall be dealt with and continued, and in respect of which every right and liability shall remain as if this Act had not been passed.(2) All persons appointed under any Act, or section of an Act, hereby repealed, and holding office at the time of the passing of this Act, shall be deemed to have been appointed hereunder.(3) All proclamations, regulations, forms of indictments, records, informations, depositions, convictions, warrants, recognizances, and proceedings, and all orders or directions prescribing the form or kind of instrument to be used in the whipping of offenders, or the manner of its use, made, prescribed, or given under the authority of any Act hereby repealed, and being in force at the time of the passing of this Act, shall be deemed to have been made, prescribed, or given under the authority of this Act.
Application of certain sections and Parts
3 Application of certain Parts of Act
The sections mentioned in the Second Schedule, so far as their provisions can be applied, shall be in force with respect to all offences, whether at Common Law or by Statute, whensoever committed and in whatsoever Court tried.s 3, hdg: Ins 1929 No 2, sec 21 (c).
Territorial application of the criminal law of the State
3A Territorial application of the criminal law of the State
(1) An offence against the law of the State is committed if:(a) all elements necessary to constitute the offence (disregarding territorial considerations) exist, and(b) a territorial nexus exists between the State and at least one element of the offence.(2) A territorial nexus exists between the State and an element of an offence if:(a) the element is or includes an event occurring in the State, or(b) the element is or includes an event that occurs outside the State but while the person alleged to have committed the offence is in the State.(3) The existence of the territorial nexus required by subsection (1) (b) (the necessary territorial nexus) is to be presumed and the presumption is conclusive unless rebutted under subsection (4).(4) If a person charged with an offence disputes the existence of the necessary territorial nexus, the court is to proceed with the trial of the offence in the usual way and if at the conclusion of the trial the court, or, in the case of a jury trial, the jury, is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the necessary territorial nexus does not exist, it must, subject to subsection (5), make or return a finding to that effect and the charge is to be dismissed.(5) If the court, or, in the case of a jury trial, the jury, would, disregarding territorial considerations, find the person not guilty of the offence (but not on the ground of mental illness) the court or jury must make or return a finding of not guilty.(6) The issue of whether the necessary territorial nexus exists must, if raised before the trial, be reserved for consideration at the trial.(7) A power or authority exercisable on reasonable suspicion that an offence has been committed may be exercised in the State if the person in whom the power or authority is vested suspects on reasonable grounds that the elements necessary to constitute the offence exist (whether or not that person suspects or has any ground to suspect that the necessary territorial nexus with the State exists).(8) This section applies to offences committed before or after the commencement of this section but does not apply to an offence if:(a) the law under which the offence is created makes the place of commission (explicitly or by necessary implication) an element of the offence, or(b) the law under which the offence is created is a law of extraterritorial operation and explicitly or by necessary implication excludes the requirement for a territorial nexus between the State and an element of the offence, or(c) proceedings are pending at the commencement of this section in relation to the offence.(9) This section is in addition to and does not derogate from any other basis on which the courts of the State may exercise criminal jurisdiction.(10) In this section:event means any act, omission, occurrence, circumstance or state of affairs (not including intention, knowledge or any other state of mind).the State includes:(a) the territorial sea adjacent to the State, and(b) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea that is not within the limits of the State.(11) If a person charged with a particular offence could be found guilty on that charge of some other offence or offences, that person is, for the purposes of this section, taken to be charged with each offence.(12) To avoid doubt, a reference in this section to a trial (whether or not a jury trial) includes a reference to a special hearing within the meaning of the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990.s 3A and hdg: Ins 1992 No 83, Sch 1 (2).
Misuse of public property by public officials outside the State
3B Misuse of public property by public officials outside the State
(1) A public official commits an offence under section 178BA or 178BB if:(a) the public official does, or omits to do, outside the State any act or thing that constitutes the offence, and(b) (apart from this section) the act or omission would have constituted the offence had it been done, or omitted to be done, within the State, and(c) the offence involves public money of the State or other property held by any person for or on behalf of the State.(2) A public official who commits an offence by the operation of this section may be dealt with, and is liable to the same punishment, as if the public official had committed the offence within the State.(3) A sufficient nexus exists between the State and an element of an offence to which this section applies if the offence is committed by a public official and involves the misuse of public money of the State or other property held by any person for or on behalf of the State.(4) The other provisions of this Act, the provisions of other Acts and the common law, in so far as these are applicable, apply to an offence to which this section applies as if it had been committed within the State (for example, section 344A and the rules of law relating to attempts to commit offences apply to such an offence).(5) Nothing in this section prevents or affects any other punishment, or any forfeiture, provided under any Act. In particular, nothing in this section prevents or affects any other punishment for a breach of discipline by a public official.(6) This section applies only to acts or omissions occurring after the commencement of this section.(7) This section is in addition to and does not derogate from any other basis on which the courts of the State may exercise criminal jurisdiction.(8) In this section:public official has the same meaning as it has in the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988.the State includes:(a) the territorial sea adjacent to the State, and(b) the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea that is not within the limits of the State.s 3B and hdg: Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
Interpretation
4 Definitions
(1) In this Act, unless the context or subject-matter otherwise indicates or requires:Aircraft includes any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of the air.Armed, in relation to a weapon, or instrument, or an offensive weapon, or instrument, that is a dangerous weapon, includes bearing or having the immediate physical possession of the weapon, or instrument.Banker includes every director or manager of any banking company, whether incorporated or not, or of any branch thereof, and every person carrying on the business of a banker.Cattle includes any horse, mare, gelding, colt, foal, filly, ass, mule, bull, cow, ox, steer, heifer, calf, ram, ewe, sheep, lamb, pig, goat, deer, alpaca, llama, vicuna, camel, or dromedary, and every hybrid or cross thereof.Counsel includes attorneys.Court and Judge respectively shall be equally taken to mean the Court in which or the Judge before whom the trial or proceeding is had in respect of which either word is used.Dangerous weapon means:(a) a firearm (within the meaning of the Firearms Act 1996), or(b) a prohibited weapon or prohibited article (within the meaning of the Prohibited Weapons Act 1989), or(c) a spear gun.Document of title to goods includes every bill of lading, India warrant, dock warrant, warehousekeeper’s certificate, warrant, or order for the delivery or transfer of any goods or valuable thing, and every bought and sold note or document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of the possession or control of goods, or purporting to authorise by indorsement or delivery, the possessor of such document to transfer or receive any goods thereby represented or therein mentioned or referred to.Document of title to land includes every deed, certificate of title, map, paper, or parchment, written or printed, or partly written and partly printed, being or containing evidence of the title, or part of the title, to any real estate or to any interest in or out of real estate.Domestic violence offence means a personal violence offence committed against:(a) a person who is or has been married to the person who commits the offence, or(b) a person who is living with or has lived with the person who commits the offence as his wife or her husband, as the case may be, on a bona fide domestic basis although not married to him or her, as the case may be, or(c) a person who is living with or has lived ordinarily in the same household as the person who commits the offence (otherwise than merely as a tenant or boarder), or(d) a person who is or has been a relative (within the meaning of subsection (6)) of the person who commits the offence, or(e) a person who has or has had an intimate personal relationship with the person who commits the offence.Dwelling-house includes:(a) any building or other structure intended for occupation as a dwelling and capable of being so occupied, although it has never been so occupied,(b) a boat or vehicle in or on which any person resides, and(c) any building or other structure within the same curtilage as a dwelling-house, and occupied therewith or whose use is ancillary to the occupation of the dwelling-house.Governor means, except in respect of the exercise of the pardoning power, the Governor with the advice of the Executive Council.Grievous bodily harm includes any permanent or serious disfiguring of the person.Indictment includes any information presented or filed as provided by law for the prosecution of offences.Judge—see Court.Justice means a Justice of the Peace.Loaded arms means any gun, pistol, or other arms, loaded in the barrel or chamber or magazine with gunpowder or other explosive substance, and with ball, shot, slug, or other destructive material, although the attempt to discharge may fail from want of proper priming, or from any other cause; and every gun, pistol, or other arms, unlawfully presented at any person, shall be deemed to be loaded unless the contrary is shown.Member of the crew in relation to an aircraft means a person having functions or duties on board the aircraft.Money includes all coined money, whether current within New South Wales or not, and all bank notes or instruments ordinarily so called, if current as such, and payable to the bearer.Night means the period of time commencing at nine of the clock in the evening of each day and concluding at six of the clock in the morning of the next succeeding day.Offensive weapon and Offensive weapon, or instrument, include a dangerous weapon and also include an imitation or replica of an offensive weapon or of an offensive weapon, or an instrument, as the case may require.Officer, in relation to a body corporate or public company, includes a person who has been appointed, or acts, as an auditor of the body corporate or public company.Person, Master, and Employer severally include any society, company, or corporation.Personal violence offence means:(a) an offence under, or mentioned in, section 19, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 33A, 35, 39, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 58, 59, 61, 61B, 61C, 61D, 61E, 61I, 61J, 61K, 61L, 61M, 61N or 61O, or(b) an offence of attempting to commit an offence referred to in paragraph (a).Place of Divine worship includes any building or structure ordinarily used for Divine worship.Prescribed sexual offence means:(a) an offence under section 61B, 61C, 61D, 61E, 61I, 61J, 61K, 61L, 61M, 61N, 61O, 65A, 66A, 66B, 66C, 66D, 66F, 78H, 78I, 78K, 78L or 80A,(b) an offence (such as an offence under section 37 or 112) which includes the commission, or an intention to commit, an offence referred to in paragraph (a), or(c) an offence of attempting, or of conspiracy or incitement, to commit an offence referred to in paragraph (a) or (b).Prescribed sexual offence proceedings means proceedings in which a person stands charged with a prescribed sexual offence, whether the person stands charged with that offence alone or together with any other offence (as an additional or alternative count) and whether or not the person is liable, on the charge, to be found guilty of any other offence.Property includes every description of real and personal property; money, valuable securities, debts, and legacies; and all deeds and instruments relating to, or evidencing the title or right to any property, or giving a right to recover or receive any money or goods; and includes not only property originally in the possession or under the control of any person, but also any property into or for which the same may have been converted or exchanged, and everything acquired by such conversion or exchange, whether immediately or otherwise.Property belonging to a vessel includes every portion of its cargo, and property belonging to any of the officers, crew, or passengers thereof.Railway includes a tramway, and also includes all stations, buildings, structures and equipment belonging to or associated with a railway or tramway.Trustee means a trustee on some express trust howsoever created, and includes the heir or personal representative of such trustee, and every other person upon whom the duty of such trust shall have devolved, and also any official manager, assignee, liquidator, or other like officer, acting under any Act relating to joint stock companies or to bankruptcy or insolvency and also an executor or administrator.Valuable security includes every order or other security whatsoever entitling or evidencing the title of any person to any share or interest in any public stock or fund, whether of any part of the British dominions or of any Foreign State, or in any fund of any body corporate, company, or society, whether within or without the British dominions, or to any deposit in any bank; and every debenture, deed, bond, bill, note, cheque, warrant, order, or security whatsoever for money, or for payment of money, whether current in any part of the British dominions or in any Foreign State, and every document of title to land or goods, as herein defined.Vessel means any ship or vessel used in or intended for navigation, not being an undecked boat.Weapon and Weapon, or instrument include a dangerous weapon and also include an imitation or replica of a weapon or of a weapon, or an instrument, as the case may require.(2) A dwelling-house does not cease to be a dwelling-house by reason only of being temporarily unoccupied.(3) Notwithstanding section 35 of the Interpretation Act 1987, every heading to a provision of this Act shall be taken to be part of this Act if it appears in italics or in capital letters.(4) In this Act, except in so far as the context or subject-matter otherwise indicates or requires, a reference to an offence mentioned in a specified provision of this Act that has been amended or repealed is, or includes, a reference to an offence mentioned in the provision as in force before the amendment or repeal.(5) In this Act, a reference to:(a) conviction before Justices, orincludes a reference to conviction before a Local Court.(b) conviction before two Justices,(6) For the purposes of the definition of domestic violence offence, a relative is:(a) a father, mother, grandfather, grandmother, step-father, step-mother, father-in-law or mother-in-law, or(b) a son, daughter, grandson, grand-daughter, step-son, step-daughter, son-in-law or daughter-in-law, or(c) a brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister, brother-in-law or sister-in-law, or(d) an uncle, aunt, uncle-in-law or aunt-in-law, or(e) a nephew or niece, orand includes, in the case of de-facto partners, a person who would be such a relative if the de-facto partners were married.(f) a cousin,s 4: Am 1924 No 10, sec 4 (a); 1951 No 31, sec 2 (a); 1955 No 16, sec 6 (a); 1967 No 77, sec 2 (b); 1974 No 50, sec 4 (b); 1979 No 95, Sch 1 (2); 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (2); 1982 No 116, Sch 1 (1); 1983 No 116, Sch 1 (1); 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (2); 1987 No 48, Schs 4 (1), 32; 1987 No 184, Schs 1 (2), 3 (1); 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (2); 1988 No 81, Sch 5 (2); 1989 No 62, Sch 1 (2); 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (1); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (2); 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [2].
5 Maliciously
Maliciously: Every act done of malice, whether against an individual or any corporate body or number of individuals, or done without malice but with indifference to human life or suffering, or with intent to injure some person or persons, or corporate body, in property or otherwise, and in any such case without lawful cause or excuse, or done recklessly or wantonly, shall be taken to have been done maliciously, within the meaning of this Act, and of every indictment and charge where malice is by law an ingredient in the crime.
6 Month
In this Act, and in every sentence passed by any Court or Judge or Justice under this or any other Act or at Common Law, unless the contrary is expressed:Month means a calendar month.
7 “Possession” when criminal
Where by this or any other Act the felonious receiving of any property, or its possession without lawful cause or excuse, is expressed to be an offence, every person shall be deemed to have such property in his or her possession within the meaning of such Act who:(a) has any such property in his or her custody, or(b) knowingly has any such property in the custody of another person, or(c) knowingly has any such property in a house, building, lodging, apartment, field, or other place, whether belonging to or occupied by himself or herself or not, and whether such property is there had or placed for his or her own use, or the use of another.
8 “Public place” etc
Where, by this or any other Act, or by any rule, regulation, ordinance or by-law, duly made under or by virtue of the provisions of any Act, any offence, conduct, or language, in a public place, or open and public place, or place of public resort, is made punishable, or a person guilty thereof is made liable to apprehension, the place shall be deemed public for the purposes of the enactment or taken to be otherwise within the meaning if the same, although a vessel or vehicle only, or a room, or field, or place, ordinarily private, was at the time used for a public purpose, or as a place of common resort, or was open to the public on the payment of money or otherwise.s 8: Am 1924 No 10, sec 4 (b).
9 What offences felonies
Whenever by this Act a person is made liable to the punishment of penal servitude, the offence for which such punishment may be awarded is hereby declared to be and shall be dealt with as a felony, and wherever in this Act the term felony is used, the same shall be taken to mean an offence punishable by penal servitude.s 9: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (a); 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (1).
10 What offences misdemeanours
Whenever by this Act no greater punishment can be awarded than imprisonment, with or without hard labour, or the imposition of a fine, in addition to or without imprisonment, the offence shall be and be dealt with as a misdemeanour only.s 10: Am 1974 No 50, sec 4 (c).
Part 2 Offences against the Sovereign
Treason–felony
11 Provisions of 36 Geo III, c 7, and 57 Geo III, c 6, repealed except as to offences against the person of the Sovereign
The provisions of the Act of the Parliament of Great Britain, thirty-sixth George the Third chapter seven, made perpetual by the Act of the Parliament of Great Britain and Ireland fifty-seventh George the Third chapter six, and all the provisions of the last mentioned Act in relation thereto, save such of the same respectively as relate to the compassing, imagining, inventing, devising, or intending death or destruction, or any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maim, or wounding, imprisonment, or restraint of the person of the heirs and successors of His said Majesty King George the Third, and the expressing, uttering, or declaring of such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions, or any of them, shall be and the same are hereby repealed.
12 Compassing etc deposition of the Sovereign—overawing Parliament etc
Whosoever, within New South Wales or without, compasses, imagines, invents, devises, or intends to deprive or depose Our Most Gracious Lady the Queen, her heirs or successors, from the style, honour, or Royal name of the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom, or of any other of Her Majesty’s dominions and countries, or to levy war against Her Majesty, her heirs or successors, within any part of the United Kingdom, or any other of Her Majesty’s dominions, in order, by force or constraint, to compel her or them to change her or their measures or counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon, or in order to intimidate or overawe, both Houses or either House of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, or the Parliament of New South Wales, or to move or stir any foreigner or stranger with force to invade the United Kingdom, or any other of Her Majesty’s dominions, or countries under the obeisance of Her Majesty, her heirs or successors, and expresses, utters, or declares such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions, or any of them, by publishing any printing or writing, or by open and advised speaking, or by any overt act or deed, shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 12: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (1).
13 Time within which prosecution shall be commenced and warrant issued
(1) No person shall be prosecuted for any felony by virtue of this Part in respect of such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions as aforesaid, in so far as the same are expressed, uttered, or declared by open and advised speaking only, unless:(a) information of such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, and intentions, and of the words by which the same were expressed, uttered, or declared is given upon oath to one or more Justice or Justices within six days after such words were spoken, and(b) a warrant, for the apprehension of the person by whom such words were spoken, is issued within ten days next after such information was given as aforesaid.(2) No person shall be convicted of any such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions as aforesaid, in so far as the same are expressed, uttered, or declared by open or advised speaking as aforesaid, except upon the person’s own confession in open Court, or unless the words so spoken are proved by two credible witnesses.
14 In informations more than one overt act may be charged
In any information for any felony under this Part, any number of the matters, acts, or deeds by which such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions as aforesaid, or any of them, have been expressed, uttered, or declared, may be charged against the accused.
15 Information for such felonies valid though the facts may amount to treason
If the facts or matters alleged in an information for any felony under this Part amount in law to treason, such information shall not by reason thereof be deemed void, erroneous, or defective, and if the facts or matters proved on the trial of any person informed against for any felony under this Part amount in law to treason, such person shall not by reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted of such felony, but no person tried for such felony shall be afterwards prosecuted for treason upon the same facts.
16 Nothing herein to affect 25 Ed III, c 2
Nothing contained in this Part shall lessen the force of, or in any matter affect, anything enacted by the Statute passed in the twenty-fifth year of King Edward the Third “A declaration which offences shall be adjudged Treason”.
16A Procedure in cases of treason
In all cases of treason, whether alleged to have been committed before or after the passing of the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1951, the person charged shall be arraigned and tried in the same manner, and according to the same course and order of trial in every respect as if such person stood charged with murder.s 16A: Ins 1951 No 31, sec 2 (b) (i).
Part 3 Offences against the person
Homicide
17 (Repealed)
s 17: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (c).
17A Date of death
(1) The rule of law that it is conclusively presumed that an injury was not the cause of death of a person if the person died after the expiration of the period of a year and a day after the date on which the person received the injury is abrogated.(2) This section does not apply in respect of an injury received before the commencement of this section.s 17A: Ins 1990 No 101, Sch 1 (2).
18 Murder and manslaughter defined
(1)(a) Murder shall be taken to have been committed where the act of the accused, or thing by him or her omitted to be done, causing the death charged, was done or omitted with reckless indifference to human life, or with intent to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm upon some person, or done in an attempt to commit, or during or immediately after the commission, by the accused, or some accomplice with him or her, of a crime punishable by penal servitude for life or for 25 years.(b) Every other punishable homicide shall be taken to be manslaughter.(2)(a) No act or omission which was not malicious, or for which the accused had lawful cause or excuse, shall be within this section.(b) No punishment or forfeiture shall be incurred by any person who kills another by misfortune only, or in his or her own defence.s 18: Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (a); 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (2); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (2).
19 (Repealed)
s 19: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (b); 1982 No 24, Sch 1 (1); 1982 No 81, Sch 1 (1) (rep); 1987 No 58, Sch 3. Rep 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (3).
19A Punishment for murder
(1) A person who commits the crime of murder is liable to penal servitude for life.(2) A person sentenced to penal servitude for life for the crime of murder is to serve that sentence for the term of the person’s natural life.(3) Nothing in this section affects the operation of section 442 (which authorises the passing of a lesser sentence than penal servitude for life).(4) This section applies to murder committed before or after the commencement of this section.(5) However, this section does not apply where committal proceedings (or proceedings by way of ex officio indictment) for the murder were instituted against the convicted person before the commencement of this section. In such a case, section 19 as in force before that commencement continues to apply.(6) Nothing in this section affects the prerogative of mercy.s 19A: Ins 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (4).
20 Child murder—when child deemed born alive
On the trial of a person for the murder of a child, such child shall be held to have been born alive if it has breathed, and has been wholly born into the world whether it has had an independent circulation or not.
21 Child murder by mother—verdict of contributing to death etc
Whosoever, being a woman delivered of a child is indicted for its murder, shall, if the jury acquit her of the murder, and specially find that she has in any manner wilfully contributed to the death of such child, whether during delivery, or at or after its birth, or has wilfully caused any violence, the mark of which has been found on its body, be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
22 Trial for child murder—verdict of concealment of birth
Where, on the trial of a person for the murder or manslaughter of a child, the jury are not satisfied that the person is guilty thereof, but are satisfied that the person is guilty of an offence within section 85, they may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of an offence under the said section, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 22: Am 1929 No 2, sec 4.
22A Infanticide
(1) Where a woman by any wilful act or omission causes the death of her child, being a child under the age of twelve months, but at the time of the act or omission the balance of her mind was disturbed by reason of her not having fully recovered from the effect of giving birth to the child or by reason of the effect of lactation consequent upon the birth of the child, then, notwithstanding that the circumstances were such that but for this section the offence would have amounted to murder, she shall be guilty of infanticide, and may for such offence be dealt with and punished as if she had been guilty of the offence of manslaughter of such child.(2) Where upon the trial of a woman for the murder of her child, being a child under the age of twelve months, the jury are of opinion that she by any wilful act or omission caused its death, but that at the time of the act or omission the balance of her mind was disturbed by reason of her not having fully recovered from the effect of giving birth to such child or by reason of the effect of lactation consequent upon the birth of the child, then the jury may, notwithstanding that the circumstances were such that but for the provisions of this section they might have returned a verdict of murder, return in lieu thereof a verdict of infanticide, and the woman may be dealt with and punished as if she had been guilty of the offence of manslaughter of the said child.(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the power of the jury upon an indictment for the murder of a child to return a verdict of manslaughter or a verdict of not guilty on the ground of insanity, or a verdict of concealment of birth.s 22A: Ins 1951 No 31, sec 2 (d).
23 Trial for murder—provocation
(1) Where, on the trial of a person for murder, it appears that the act or omission causing death was an act done or omitted under provocation and, but for this subsection and the provocation, the jury would have found the accused guilty of murder, the jury shall acquit the accused of murder and find the accused guilty of manslaughter.(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), an act or omission causing death is an act done or omitted under provocation where:(a) the act or omission is the result of a loss of self-control on the part of the accused that was induced by any conduct of the deceased (including grossly insulting words or gestures) towards or affecting the accused, andwhether that conduct of the deceased occurred immediately before the act or omission causing death or at any previous time.(b) that conduct of the deceased was such as could have induced an ordinary person in the position of the accused to have so far lost self-control as to have formed an intent to kill, or to inflict grievous bodily harm upon, the deceased,(3) For the purpose of determining whether an act or omission causing death was an act done or omitted under provocation as provided by subsection (2), there is no rule of law that provocation is negatived if:(a) there was not a reasonable proportion between the act or omission causing death and the conduct of the deceased that induced the act or omission,(b) the act or omission causing death was not an act done or omitted suddenly, or(c) the act or omission causing death was an act done or omitted with any intent to take life or inflict grievous bodily harm.(4) Where, on the trial of a person for murder, there is any evidence that the act causing death was an act done or omitted under provocation as provided by subsection (2), the onus is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the act or omission causing death was not an act done or omitted under provocation.(5) This section does not exclude or limit any defence to a charge of murder.s 23: Subst 1982 No 24, Sch 1 (2).
23A Substantial impairment by abnormality of mind
(1) A person who would otherwise be guilty of murder is not to be convicted of murder if:(a) at the time of the acts or omissions causing the death concerned, the person’s capacity to understand events, or to judge whether the person’s actions were right or wrong, or to control himself or herself, was substantially impaired by an abnormality of mind arising from an underlying condition, and(b) the impairment was so substantial as to warrant liability for murder being reduced to manslaughter.(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) (b), evidence of an opinion that an impairment was so substantial as to warrant liability for murder being reduced to manslaughter is not admissible.(3) If a person was intoxicated at the time of the acts or omissions causing the death concerned, and the intoxication was self-induced intoxication (within the meaning of section 428A), the effects of that self-induced intoxication are to be disregarded for the purpose of determining whether the person is not liable to be convicted of murder by virtue of this section.(4) The onus is on the person accused to prove that he or she is not liable to be convicted of murder by virtue of this section.(5) A person who but for this section would be liable, whether as principal or accessory, to be convicted of murder is to be convicted of manslaughter instead.(6) The fact that a person is not liable to be convicted of murder in respect of a death by virtue of this section does not affect the question of whether any other person is liable to be convicted of murder in respect of that death.(7) If, on the trial of a person for murder, the person contends:(a) that the person is entitled to be acquitted on the ground that the person was mentally ill at the time of the acts or omissions causing the death concerned, orevidence may be offered by the prosecution tending to prove the other of those contentions, and the Court may give directions as to the stage of the proceedings at which that evidence may be offered.(b) that the person is not liable to be convicted of murder by virtue of this section,(8) In this section:underlying condition means a pre-existing mental or physiological condition, other than a condition of a transitory kind.s 23A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (b). Subst 1997 No 106, Sch 1 [1].
24 Manslaughter—punishment
Whosoever commits the crime of manslaughter shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years:Provided that, in any case, if the Judge is of the opinion that, having regard to all the circumstances, a nominal punishment would be sufficient, the Judge may discharge the jury from giving any verdict, and such discharge shall operate as an acquittal.s 24: Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (c); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (5).
25 (Repealed)
s 25: Rep 1992 No 83, Sch 1 (3).
Conspiracy to murder
26 Conspiring to commit murder
Whosoever:conspires and agrees to murder any person, whether a subject of Her Majesty or not, and whether within the Queen’s dominions or not, orshall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.solicits, encourages, persuades, or endeavours to persuade, or proposes to, any person to commit any such murder,s 26: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (6).
Attempts to murder
27 Acts done to the person with intent to murder
Whosoever:administers to, or causes to be taken by, any person any poison, or other destructive thing, orwith intent in any such case to commit murder,by any means wounds, or causes grievous bodily harm to any person,
shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 27: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (c); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (7).
28 Acts done to property with intent to murder
Whosoever:sets fire to any vessel, or any chattel therein, or any part of her tackle apparel or furniture, orcasts away or destroys any vessel, orby the explosion of gunpowder, or other explosive substance, destroys, or damages any building, orplaces, or throws, any matter or thing upon or across a railway, orwith intent in any such case to commit murder,removes, or displaces any sleeper, or other thing belonging to a railway,
shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 28: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (d); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (8).
29 Certain other attempts to murder
Whosoever:attempts to administer to, or cause to be taken by, any person any poison, or other destructive thing, orshoots at, or in any manner attempts to discharge any kind of loaded arms at any person, orwith intent in any such case to commit murder,attempts to drown, suffocate, or strangle any person,
shall, whether any bodily injury is effected or not, be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 29: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (9).
30 Attempts to murder by other means
Whosoever, by any means other than those specified in sections 27 to 29 both inclusive, attempts to commit murder shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 30: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (10).
Documents containing threats
31 Documents containing threats
s 31, hdg: Subst 1994 No 83, Sch 1 (2).(1) A person who maliciously, and knowing its contents, sends or delivers, or directly or indirectly causes to be received, any document threatening to kill or inflict bodily harm on any person is liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(2) It is immaterial for the purposes of an offence under this section whether or not a document sent or delivered is actually received, and whether or not the threat contained in a document sent, delivered or received is actually communicated to the person concerned or to the recipient or intended recipient of the document (as relevant in the circumstances).s 31: Subst 1994 No 83, Sch 1 (3).
Suicide
31A Suicide and attempt to commit suicide
The rule of law that it is a crime for a person to commit, or to attempt to commit, suicide is abrogated.ss 31A–31C and hdg: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (2).
31B Survivor of suicide pact
(1) The survivor of a suicide pact shall not be guilty of murder or manslaughter but may be guilty of an offence under section 31C.(2) In this section, suicide pact means a common agreement between 2 or more persons having for its object the death of all of them, whether or not each is to take his or her own life, but nothing done by a person who enters into a suicide pact shall be treated as being done by the person in pursuance of the pact unless it is done while the person has the settled intention of dying in pursuance of the pact.(3) The onus of proving the existence of a suicide pact shall lie with the accused person on the balance of probabilities.
31C Aiding etc suicide
(1) A person who aids or abets the suicide or attempted suicide of another person shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(2) Where:(a) a person incites or counsels another person to commit suicide, andthe firstmentioned person shall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(b) that other person commits, or attempts to commit, suicide as a consequence of that incitement or counsel,
Acts causing danger to life or bodily harm
32 Impeding endeavours to escape shipwreck
Whosoever:maliciously prevents or impedes any person on board of, or having quitted, any ship or vessel in distress, or wrecked, stranded, or cast on shore, in his or her endeavour to save his or her life, orshall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.maliciously prevents or impedes any person in his or her endeavour to save the life of such first-mentioned person,s 32: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (11).
32A–32C (Repealed)
s 32A: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 2 (c). Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (3).
s 32B: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 2 (c). Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (3).
s 32C: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (d). Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (3).
33 Wounding etc with intent to do bodily harm or resist arrest
Whosoever:maliciously by any means wounds or inflicts grievous bodily harm upon any person, orwith intent in any such case to do grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist, or prevent, the lawful apprehension or detainer either of himself or herself or any other person,maliciously shoots at, or in any manner attempts to discharge any kind of loaded arms at any person,
shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 33: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (12).
33A Discharging loaded arms with intent
Any person who maliciously discharges, or in any manner attempts to discharge, any kind of loaded arms with intent to do grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist, or prevent, the lawful apprehension or detention either of himself or herself or any other person, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.s 33A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (e).
33B Use or possession of weapon to resist arrest etc
Any person who:(a) uses, attempts to use, threatens to use or possesses an offensive weapon or instrument, orwith intent to commit an indictable offence or with intent to prevent or hinder the lawful apprehension or detention either of himself or herself or any other person or to prevent or hinder a member of the police force from investigating any act or circumstance which reasonably calls for investigation by the member shall be liable to penal servitude for 12 years.(b) threatens injury to any person or property,s 33B: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (e). Am 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (2).
34 Feloniously wounding—verdict of minor offence
Where, on the trial of a person for an offence under section 33, the jury are satisfied that the accused is guilty of the wounding, or inflicting grievous bodily harm, mentioned in the indictment, but are not satisfied that the person is guilty of the intent charged therein, they may acquit the person of such intent and find the person guilty of an offence under section 35, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 34: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
35 Malicious wounding or infliction of grievous bodily harm
Whosoever maliciously by any means:(a) wounds any person, orshall be liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(b) inflicts grievous bodily harm upon any person,s 35: Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (f). Subst 1983 No 10, Sch 1 (1).
35A Maliciously cause dog to inflict grievous bodily harm or actual bodily harm
(1) Maliciously cause dog to inflict grievous bodily harm A person who, having control of a dog, maliciously does any act which causes the dog to inflict grievous bodily harm on another person is liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(2) Maliciously cause dog to inflict actual bodily harm A person who, having control of a dog, maliciously does any act which causes the dog to inflict actual bodily harm on another person is liable to penal servitude for 5 years.(3) Alternative finding If, on the trial of a person for an offence under subsection (1), it appears that grievous bodily harm was not inflicted on the other person but that actual bodily harm was inflicted, the person may be found not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of an offence under subsection (2) and be liable to punishment accordingly.(4) Doing an act includes omitting to do the act In this section, a reference to the doing of an act includes a reference to omitting to do the act.s 35A: Ins 1993 No 23, Sch 1 (1).
36 Causing a grievous bodily disease
A person:(a) who maliciously by any means causes another person to contract a grievous bodily disease, orwith the intent in any such case of causing the other person to contract a grievous bodily disease, is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(b) who attempts maliciously by any means to cause another person to contract a grievous bodily disease,s 36: Rep 1924 No 10, sec 5 (a). Ins 1990 No 101, Sch 2.
37 Attempts to choke etc (garrotting)
Whosoever:by any means attempts to choke suffocate or strangle any person, orwith intent in any such case to enable himself or herself or another person to commit, or with intent in any such case to assist any person in committing, an indictable offence,by any means calculated to choke suffocate or strangle, attempts to render any person insensible unconscious or incapable of resistance,
shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 37: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (13).
38 Using chloroform etc to commit an offence
Whosoever unlawfully applies or administers to, or causes to be taken by, or attempts to apply or administer to, or cause to be taken by, any person, any chloroform laudanum or other stupefying or over-powering drug or thing, with intent in any such case to enable himself or herself, or another person, to commit, or with intent to assist another person in committing, an indictable offence, shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 38: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (14).
39 Using poison etc so as to endanger life
Whosoever maliciously administers to, or causes to be administered to, or taken by, any person, any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, so as to endanger the life of such person, or so as to inflict upon such person grievous bodily harm, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
40 On trial for poisoning—verdict of minor offence
Where, on the trial of a person for an offence under section 39, the jury are not satisfied that the accused is guilty thereof, but are satisfied that the person is guilty of an offence within section 41, they may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of an offence under the said last-mentioned section, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 40: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
41 Administering poison etc with intent to injure or annoy
Whosoever maliciously administers to, or causes to be administered to, or taken by, any person, any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, with intent to injure aggrieve or annoy such person, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
41A Poisoning etc of water supply
Whosoever maliciously introduces any poison or other destructive or noxious thing into a supply of water with intent to injure any person or persons shall be liable to penal servitude for 5 years.s 41A: Ins 1980 No 53, Sch 1 (2).
42 Injuries to child at time of birth
Whosoever, during or after the delivery of a child, maliciously inflicts on such child, whether then wholly born or not, any grievous bodily harm, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
43 Exposing or abandoning child under two
Whosoever unlawfully abandons or exposes any child under the age of two years, whereby the life of such child was or is endangered, or its health was or is likely to be seriously injured, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
44 Not providing wife, child or servant with food etc
Whosoever:being legally liable to provide any wife, child, ward, apprentice, or servant or any insane person with necessary food, clothing, or lodging, wilfully and without lawful excuse refuses or neglects to provide the same, orso that, in any such case, his or her life is endangered, or his or her health becomes or is likely to be seriously injured,maliciously does, or causes to be done, any bodily harm to any wife, child, ward, apprentice or servant, or to any insane person
shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
45 Prohibition of female genital mutilation
(1) A person who:(a) excises, infibulates or otherwise mutilates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person, oris liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(b) aids, abets, counsels or procures a person to perform any of those acts on another person,(2) An offence is committed against this section even if one or more of the acts constituting the offence occurred outside New South Wales if the person mutilated by or because of the acts is ordinarily resident in the State.(3) It is not an offence against this section to perform a surgical operation if that operation:(a) is necessary for the health of the person on whom it is performed and is performed by a medical practitioner, or(b) is performed on a person in labour or who has just given birth, and for medical purposes connected with that labour or birth, by a medical practitioner or authorised professional, or(c) is a sexual reassignment procedure and is performed by a medical practitioner.(4) In determining whether an operation is necessary for the health of a person only matters relevant to the medical welfare of the person are to be taken into account.(5) It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the person mutilated by or because of the acts alleged to have been committed consented to the acts.(6) This section applies only to acts occurring after the commencement of the section.(7) In this section:means:(a) a person authorised to practise midwifery under the Nurses Act 1991 or undergoing a course of training with a view to being so authorised, or(b) in relation to an operation performed in a place outside New South Wales—a person authorised to practise midwifery by a body established under the law of that place having functions similar to the functions of the Nurses Registration Board, or undergoing a course of training with a view to being so authorised, or(c) a medical student.medical practitioner, in relation to an operation performed in a place outside New South Wales, includes a person authorised to practise medicine by a body established under the law of that place having functions similar to the functions of the New South Wales Medical Board.medical student means:(a) a registered medical student within the meaning of the Medical Practice Act 1992, or(b) in relation to an operation performed in a place outside New South Wales—a person undergoing a course of training with a view to being authorised to be a medical practitioner in that place.sexual reassignment procedure means a surgical procedure to alter the genital appearance of a person to the appearance (as nearly as practicable) of the opposite sex to the sex of the person.s 45: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 5 (g). Ins 1994 No 58, sec 3.
46 Causing bodily injury by gunpowder etc
Whosoever maliciously by the explosion of gunpowder or other substance, or the use of any corrosive fluid, or destructive matter, burns maims disfigures disables, or does grievous bodily harm to, any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 46: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (15).
47 Using etc explosive substance or corrosive fluid etc
Whosoever:maliciously causes any gunpowder or other explosive substance to explode, ormaliciously sends, or delivers to, or causes to be taken, or received by, any person, any explosive substance, or other dangerous or noxious thing, orwith intent in any such case to burn maim disfigure disable, or do grievous bodily harm to, any person,maliciously puts or lays at any place, or casts or throws at, or upon, or otherwise applies to, any person, any corrosive fluid or any destructive or explosive substance,
shall, whether bodily injury is effected or not, be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 47: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (16).
48 Placing gunpowder near a building etc
Whosoever maliciously places, or throws into, upon, against, or near, any building, ship, or vessel, any gunpowder, or other explosive substance, with intent to do some bodily injury to any person, shall, whether an explosion takes place or not, and whether bodily injury is effected or not, be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
49 Setting trap etc
(1) Any person who:(a) places or sets, or causes to be placed or set, any trap, device or thing (whether its nature be electronic, electric, mechanical, chemical or otherwise) capable of destroying human life or inflicting grievous bodily harm on any person, orwith intent to inflict grievous bodily harm shall be liable to imprisonment for five years.(b) knowingly permits any such trap, device or thing to continue to be placed or set,(2) Nothing in subsection (1) shall extend to any gin or trap, placed with the intention of destroying vermin, or to any trap, device or thing placed in a dwelling-house for the protection thereof.s 49: Subst 1974 No 50, sec 5 (h).
50, 51 (Repealed)
s 50: Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (4).
s 51: Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (i). Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (4).
51A Predatory driving
(1) The driver of a vehicle who, while in pursuit of or travelling near another vehicle:(a) engages in a course of conduct that causes or threatens an impact involving the other vehicle, andis guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(b) intends by that course of conduct to cause a person in the other vehicle actual bodily harm,(2) This section does not take away the liability of any person to be prosecuted for or found guilty of an offence under this Act or of any other offence, or affect the punishment that may be imposed for any such offence. However, a person who:(a) has been convicted or acquitted of an offence under this section cannot be prosecuted for any other offence under this Act on the same, or substantially the same, facts, or(b) has been convicted or acquitted of any other offence under this Act cannot be prosecuted for an offence under this section on the same, or substantially the same, facts.(3) In this section:impact involving a vehicle includes:(a) an impact with any other vehicle or with a person or object, or(b) the vehicle overturning or leaving a road.vehicle has the same meaning it has in section 52A.s 51A: Ins 1997 No 75, Sch 2.
52 (Repealed)
s 52: Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (4).
52A Dangerous driving: substantive matters
(1) Dangerous driving occasioning death A person is guilty of the offence of dangerous driving occasioning death if the vehicle driven by the person is involved in an impact occasioning the death of another person and the driver was, at the time of the impact, driving the vehicle:(a) under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a drug, or(b) at a speed dangerous to another person or persons, or(c) in a manner dangerous to another person or persons.A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(2) Aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death A person is guilty of the offence of aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death if the person commits the offence of dangerous driving occasioning death in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.(3) Dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm A person is guilty of the offence of dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm if the vehicle driven by the person is involved in an impact occasioning grievous bodily harm to another person and the driver was, at the time of the impact, driving the vehicle:(a) under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a drug, or(b) at a speed dangerous to another person or persons, or(c) in a manner dangerous to another person or persons.A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(4) Aggravated dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm A person is guilty of the offence of aggravated dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm if the person commits the offence of dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 11 years.(5) When vehicle is involved in impact—generally For the purposes of this section, the circumstances in which a vehicle is involved in an impact occasioning the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, a person include if the death or harm is occasioned through any of the following:(a) the vehicle overturning or leaving a road while the person is being conveyed in or on that vehicle (whether as a passenger or otherwise),(b) an impact between any object and the vehicle while the person is being conveyed in or on that vehicle (whether as a passenger or otherwise),(c) an impact between the person and the vehicle,(d) the impact of the vehicle with another vehicle or an object in, on or near which the person is at the time of the impact,(e) an impact with anything on, or attached to, the vehicle,(f) an impact with anything that is in motion through falling from the vehicle.(6) When vehicle is involved in causing other impacts For the purposes of this section, a vehicle is also involved in an impact occasioning the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, a person if:(a) the death or harm is occasioned through the vehicle causing an impact between other vehicles or between another vehicle and any object or person or causing another vehicle to overturn or leave a road, and(b) the prosecution proves that the vehicle caused the impact.(7) Circumstances of aggravation In this section, circumstances of aggravation means any circumstances at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm in which:(a) the prescribed concentration of alcohol was present in the accused’s blood, or(b) the accused was driving the vehicle concerned on a road at a speed that exceeded, by more than 45 kilometres per hour, the speed limit (if any) applicable to that length of road, or(c) the accused was driving the vehicle to escape pursuit by a police officer, or(d) the accused’s ability to drive was very substantially impaired by the fact that the accused was under the influence of a drug (other than intoxicating liquor) or a combination of drugs (whether or not intoxicating liquor was part of that combination).(8) Defences It is a defence to any charge under this section if the death or grievous bodily harm occasioned by the impact was not in any way attributable (as relevant):(a) to the fact that the person charged was under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a drug or a combination of drugs, or(b) to the speed at which the vehicle was driven, or(c) to the manner in which the vehicle was driven.(9) Definitions In this section:drug has the meaning it has in section 2 (1) of the Traffic Act 1909.object includes an animal, building, structure, earthwork, embankment, gutter, stormwater channel, drain, bridge, culvert, median strip, post or tree.prescribed concentration of alcohol means a concentration of 0.15 grammes or more of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood.road means:(a) a road or road related area within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909 (other than a road or road related area that is the subject of a declaration made under section 2A (1) (b) of that Act), or(b) any other place.vehicle means:(a) any motor car, motor carriage, motor cycle or other vehicle propelled wholly or partly by volatile spirit, steam, gas, oil, electricity, or by any other means other than human or animal power, orwhether or not it is adapted for road use, but does not mean a vehicle used on a railway or tramway.(b) a horse-drawn vehicle,s 52A: Ins 1951 No 31, sec 2 (e). Am 1955 No 16, sec 2; 1966 No 31, sec 47; 1974 No 50, sec 5 (j); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (2); 1983 No 10, Sch 5 (1); 1988 No 81, Sch 2 (1); 1990 No 46, Sch 2. Subst 1994 No 78, Sch 1. Am 1995 No 16, Sch 2.7 [1]; 1997 No 115, Sch 4.4 [1]; 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [1] [2].
52AA Dangerous driving: procedural matters
(1) Presumption as to intoxication For the purposes of section 52A, the accused is conclusively presumed to be under the influence of liquor if the prosecution proves that the prescribed concentration of alcohol was present in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm.(2) Evidence of intoxication For the purposes of section 52A, evidence may be given of the concentration of alcohol present in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm occurring at a place that is not a road or road related area within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909 (other than a road or road related area that is the subject of a declaration made under section 2A (1) (b) of that Act) as determined by a blood analysis carried out in accordance with sections 4F and 4G of that Act.(3) Time of intoxication A concentration of alcohol determined by the means referred to in subsection (2) is taken to be the concentration of alcohol in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm:(a) if the blood sample that was analysed was taken within 2 hours after the impact, and(b) unless the accused proves that the concentration of alcohol in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact was less than the prescribed concentration of alcohol.(4) Alternative verdicts If on the trial of a person who is indicted for murder or manslaughter or for an offence under section 53 or 54 the jury is satisfied that the person is guilty of an offence under section 52A, it may find the accused guilty of the offence under section 52A, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(5) Question of aggravation If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 52A (2) or (4) the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 52A (1) or (3), it may find that the accused is guilty of the offence under section 52A (1) or (3), and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(6) Double jeopardy This section does not take away the liability of any person to be prosecuted for or found guilty of murder, manslaughter or any other offence or affect the punishment that may be imposed for any such offence. However, a person who:(a) has been convicted or acquitted of an offence under section 52A cannot be prosecuted for murder or manslaughter or for any other offence under this Act on the same, or substantially the same, facts, or(b) has been convicted or acquitted of murder or manslaughter or of any other offence under this Act cannot be prosecuted for an offence under section 52A on the same, or substantially the same, facts.(7) Definitions In this section:prescribed concentration of alcohol means a concentration of 0.15 grammes or more of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood.s 52AA: Ins 1994 No 78, Sch 1. Am 1995 No 16, Sch 2.7 [2]; 1997 No 115, Sch 4.4 [2].
52B Dangerous navigation: substantive matters
(1) Dangerous navigation occasioning death A person is guilty of the offence of dangerous navigation occasioning death if the vessel navigated by the person is involved in an impact occasioning the death of another person and the person navigating the vessel was, at the time of the impact, navigating the vessel:(a) under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a drug, or(b) at a speed dangerous to the public, or(c) in a manner dangerous to the public.A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(2) Aggravated dangerous navigation occasioning death A person is guilty of the offence of aggravated dangerous navigation occasioning death if the person commits the offence of dangerous navigation occasioning death in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.(3) Dangerous navigation causing grievous bodily harm A person is guilty of the offence of dangerous navigation causing grievous bodily harm if the vessel navigated by the person is involved in an impact occasioning grievous bodily harm to another person and the person navigating the vessel was, at the time of the impact, navigating the vessel:(a) under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a drug, or(b) at a speed dangerous to the public, or(c) in a manner dangerous to the public.A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(4) Aggravated dangerous navigation occasioning grievous bodily harm A person is guilty of the offence of aggravated dangerous navigation occasioning grievous bodily harm if the person commits the offence of dangerous navigation occasioning grievous bodily harm in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 11 years.(5) When vessel is involved in impact—generally For the purposes of this section, the circumstances in which a vessel is involved in an impact occasioning the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, a person include if the death or harm is occasioned through any of the following:(a) the vessel overturning or running aground while the person is being conveyed in or on the vessel (whether as a passenger or otherwise),(b) an impact between any object and the vessel while the person is being conveyed in or on that vessel (whether as a passenger or otherwise),(c) an impact between the person and the vessel,(d) the impact of the vessel with another vessel or an object in, on or near which the person is at the time of the impact,(e) an impact with anything on, or attached to, the vessel,(f) an impact with anything that was in motion through falling from the vessel.(6) When vessel is involved in causing other impacts For the purposes of this section, a vessel is also involved in an impact occasioning the death of, or grievous bodily harm to, a person if the death or harm is occasioned through the vessel causing an impact between other vessels or between another vessel and any object or person or causing another vessel to overturn or run aground.(7) Circumstances of aggravation In this section, circumstances of aggravation means any circumstances at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm in which:(a) the prescribed concentration of alcohol was present in the accused’s blood, or(b) the accused was navigating the vessel at a speed that exceeds the speed limit (if any) applicable to the person navigating the vessel, or to the navigable waters, on which the vessel was navigated at the time of the impact, or(c) the accused was navigating the vessel in an attempt to escape pursuit by a police officer, or(d) the accused’s ability to navigate was very substantially impaired by the fact that the accused was under the influence of a drug (other than intoxicating liquor) or a combination of drugs (whether or not intoxicating liquor was part of that combination).(8) Defences It is a defence to any charge under this section if the death or grievous bodily harm occasioned by the impact was not in any way attributable (as relevant):(a) to the fact that the person charged was under the influence of intoxicating liquor or of a drug or a combination of drugs, or(b) to the speed at which the vessel was navigated, or(c) to the manner in which the vessel was navigated.(9) Definitions In this section:drug has the meaning it has in section 2 (1) of the Traffic Act 1909.object includes a pier, wharf, jetty, pontoon, buoy, breakwater, bridge, support, mooring post or platform, navigation aid, retaining wall, marina, boatshed, slipway or swimming enclosure.prescribed concentration of alcohol means a concentration of 0.15 grams or more of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood.vessel means a vessel within the meaning of the Marine (Boating Safety—Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1991.s 52B: Ins 1983 No 10, Sch 5 (2). Am 1988 No 81, Sch 2 (2); 1990 No 46, Sch 2. Subst 1996 No 6, Sch 1. Am 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [3] [4].
52BA Dangerous navigation: procedural matters
(1) Presumption as to intoxication For the purposes of section 52B, the accused is conclusively presumed to be under the influence of liquor if the prosecution proves that the prescribed concentration of alcohol was present in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm.(2) Evidence of intoxication For the purposes of section 52B, evidence may be given of the concentration of alcohol present in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm as determined by a blood analysis carried out in accordance with Part 3 of the Marine (Boating Safety—Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1991.(3) Time of intoxication A concentration of alcohol determined by the means referred to in subsection (2) is taken to be the concentration of alcohol in the accused’s blood at the time of the impact occasioning death or grievous bodily harm:(a) if the blood sample that was analysed was taken within 2 hours after the impact, and(b) unless the accused proves that the concentration of alcohol in the accused’s blood at that time was less than the prescribed concentration of alcohol.(4) Alternative verdicts If on the trial of a person who is indicted for murder or manslaughter or for an offence under section 54 the jury is satisfied that the person is guilty of an offence under section 52B, it may find the accused guilty of the offence under section 52B, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(5) Question of aggravation If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 52B (2) or (4) the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 52B (1) or (3), it may find that the accused is guilty of the offence under section 52B (1) or (3), and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(6) Double jeopardy This section does not take away the liability of any person to be prosecuted for or found guilty of murder, manslaughter or any other offence or affect the punishment that may be imposed for any such offence. However, a person who:(a) has been convicted or acquitted of an offence under section 52B cannot be prosecuted for murder or manslaughter or for any other offence under this Act on the same, or substantially the same, facts, or(b) has been convicted or acquitted of murder or manslaughter or of any other offence under this Act cannot be prosecuted for an offence under section 52B on the same, or substantially the same, facts.(7) Definition In this section:prescribed concentration of alcohol means a concentration of 0.15 grams or more of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood.s 52BA: Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
53 Injuries by furious driving etc
Whosoever, being at the time on horseback, or in charge of any carriage or other vehicle, by wanton or furious riding, or driving, or racing, or other misconduct, or by wilful neglect, does or causes to be done to any person any bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.
54 Causing grievous bodily harm
Whosoever by any unlawful or negligent act, or omission, causes grievous bodily harm to any person, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.
Possessing or making explosives, &c, with intent to injure the person
55 Possessing etc gunpowder etc with intent to injure the person
Whosoever knowingly has in his or her possession, or makes, or manufactures, any gunpowder, explosive substance, or dangerous or noxious thing, or any machine, engine, instrument, or thing:(a) with intent by means thereof to injure, or otherwise commit an offence being felony against the person of any one, orshall be liable to penal servitude for five years.(b) for the purpose of enabling another person to injure, or otherwise commit an offence being felony against the person of any one,
Assaults upon members of the clergy, officers, and others
56 Obstructing member of the clergy in discharge of his or her duties
Whosoever:s 56, hdg: Am 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [3].by threats or force prevents, or endeavours to prevent, any member of the clergy, or other person duly authorised in that behalf, from officiating in a place of divine worship, or from the performance of his or her duty in the lawful burial of the dead in a burial-place, orshall be liable to imprisonment for two years.strikes, or offers any violence to, any member of the clergy, or minister engaged in, or to the knowledge of the offender about to engage in, any of the duties aforesaid, or going to perform the same,
57 Assault on persons preserving wreck
Whosoever wounds, strikes, or assaults, any person while in the execution of his or her duty concerning the preservation of a vessel in distress, or any vessel or effects, stranded, or cast on shore, or lying under water, with intent to obstruct him or her, or thereby in fact obstructing him or her in the execution of such duty, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.
58 Assault with intent to commit felony on certain officers
Whosoever:assaults any person with intent to commit felony, orassaults, resists, or wilfully obstructs any officer while in the execution of his or her duty, such officer being a Justice, constable, or other peace officer, custom-house officer, prison officer, sheriff’s officer, or bailiff, or any person acting in aid of such officer, orshall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years.assaults any person, with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person for any offence,s 58: Am 1967 No 77, sec 5 (a); 1988 No 81, Sch 4 (1).
59 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm
Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
60 Assault of police officers
(1) A person who assaults, stalks, harasses or intimidates a police officer while in the execution of the officer’s duty, although no actual bodily harm is occasioned to the officer, is liable to penal servitude for 5 years.(2) A person who assaults a police officer while in the execution of the officer’s duty, and by the assault occasions actual bodily harm, is liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(3) A person who maliciously by any means:(a) wounds a police officer, orwhile in the execution of the officer’s duty is liable to penal servitude for 12 years.(b) inflicts grievous bodily harm on a police officer,(4) For the purposes of this section, an assault on a police officer is taken to be an assault on the officer while in the execution of the officer’s duty even though the officer is not on duty at the time of the assault, if the assault is committed as a consequence of, or in retaliation for, actions undertaken by the officer in the execution of the officer’s duty.s 60: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1996 No 6, Sch 1. Ins 1997 No 80, Sch 1.
Common assaults
61 Common assault prosecuted by indictment
Whosoever assaults any person, although not occasioning actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.s 61: Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (k).
Offences in the nature of rape, offences relating to other acts of sexual assault, &c
61A–61G (Repealed)
s 61A, hdg: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (3).
s 61A: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (1); 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (1). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
s 61B: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
s 61C: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Am 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (2). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
s 61D: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (2); 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (3). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
s 61E: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (3); 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (4). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
s 61F: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
s 61G: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (4). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (4); 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (5). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (2).
61H Definition of sexual intercourse and other terms
(1) For the purposes of sections 61H–66F, sexual intercourse means:(a) sexual connection occasioned by the penetration to any extent of the genitalia (including a surgically constructed vagina) of a female person or the anus of any person by:(i) any part of the body of another person, orexcept where the penetration is carried out for proper medical purposes, or(ii) any object manipulated by another person,(b) sexual connection occasioned by the introduction of any part of the penis of a person into the mouth of another person, or(c) cunnilingus, or(d) the continuation of sexual intercourse as defined in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).(2) For the purposes of sections 61H–66F, a person is under the authority of another person if the person is in the care, or under the supervision or authority, of the other person.(3) For the purposes of this Act, a person who incites another person to an act of indecency, as referred to in section 61N or 61O, is taken to commit an offence on the other person.s 61H: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3). Am 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (2); 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [1]; 1996 No 22, Sch 3 [1].
61I Sexual assault
Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person without the consent of the other person and who knows that the other person does not consent to the sexual intercourse is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.ss 61I–61M: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61J Aggravated sexual assault
(1) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person without the consent of the other person and in circumstances of aggravation and who knows that the other person does not consent to the sexual intercourse is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.(2) In this section, circumstances of aggravation means circumstances in which:(a) at the time of, or immediately before or after, the commission of the offence, the alleged offender maliciously inflicts actual bodily harm on the alleged victim or any other person who is present or nearby, or(b) at the time of, or immediately before or after, the commission of the offence, the alleged offender threatens to inflict actual bodily harm on the alleged victim or any other person who is present or nearby by means of an offensive weapon or instrument, or(c) the alleged offender is in the company of another person or persons, or(d) the alleged victim is under the age of 16 years, or(e) the alleged victim is (whether generally or at the time of the commission of the offence) under the authority of the alleged offender, or(f) the alleged victim has a serious physical disability, or(g) the alleged victim has a serious intellectual disability.ss 61I–61M: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61K Assault with intent to have sexual intercourse
Any person who, with intent to have sexual intercourse with another person:(a) maliciously inflicts actual bodily harm on the other person or a third person who is present or nearby, oris liable to penal servitude for 20 years.(b) threatens to inflict actual bodily harm on the other person or a third person who is present or nearby by means of an offensive weapon or instrument,ss 61I–61M: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61L Indecent assault
Any person who assaults another person and, at the time of, or immediately before or after, the assault, commits an act of indecency on or in the presence of the other person, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.ss 61I–61M: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61M Aggravated indecent assault
(1) Any person who assaults another person in circumstances of aggravation, and, at the time of, or immediately before or after, the assault, commits an act of indecency on or in the presence of the other person, is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(2) Any person who assaults another person, and, at the time of, or immediately before or after, the assault, commits an act of indecency on or in the presence of the other person, is liable to imprisonment for 10 years, if the other person is under the age of 10 years.(3) In this section, circumstances of aggravation means circumstances in which:(a) the alleged offender is in the company of another person or persons, or(b) the alleged victim is under the age of 16 years, or(c) the alleged victim is (whether generally or at the time of the commission of the offence) under the authority of the alleged offender, or(d) the alleged victim has a serious physical disability, or(e) the alleged victim has a serious intellectual disability.ss 61I–61M: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61N Act of indecency
(1) Any person who commits an act of indecency with or towards a person under the age of 16 years, or incites a person under that age to an act of indecency with or towards that or another person, is liable to imprisonment for 2 years.(2) Any person who commits an act of indecency with or towards a person of the age of 16 years or above, or incites a person of the age of 16 years or above to an act of indecency with or towards that or another person, is liable to imprisonment for 18 months.s 61N: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3). Am 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (3); 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [2].
61O Aggravated act of indecency
(1) Any person who commits an act of indecency with or towards a person under the age of 16 years, or incites a person under that age to an act of indecency with that or another person, in either case in circumstances of aggravation, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(1A) Any person who commits an act of indecency with or towards a person of the age of 16 years or above, or incites a person of the age of 16 years or above to an act of indecency with or towards that or another person, in either case in circumstances of aggravation, is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.(2) Any person who commits an act of indecency with or towards a person under the age of 10 years, or incites a person under that age to an act of indecency with that or another person, is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(3) In this section, circumstances of aggravation means circumstances in which:(a) the alleged offender is in the company of another person or persons, or(b) the alleged victim is (whether generally or at the time of the commission of the offence) under the authority of the alleged offender, or(c) the alleged victim has a serious physical disability, or(d) the alleged victim has a serious intellectual disability.s 61O: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3). Am 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [3].
61P Attempt to commit offence under sections 61I–61O
Any person who attempts to commit an offence under section 61I, 61J, 61K, 61L, 61M, 61N or 61O is liable to the penalty provided for the commission of the offence.s 61P: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61Q Alternative verdicts
(1) Question of aggravation If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 61J, 61M or 61O the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 61I, 61L or 61N, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(2) Question of consent regarding alleged victim under 16 If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 61I the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 66C (1) or 66C (2), it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(3) Question of consent or authority regarding alleged victim under 16 If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 61J the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 66A, 66C (1) or 66C (2), it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(4) Question of consent regarding incest If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 61I or 61J the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 78A or 78B, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.s 61Q: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61R Consent
(1) For the purposes of sections 61I and 61J, a person who has sexual intercourse with another person without the consent of the other person and who is reckless as to whether the other person consents to the sexual intercourse is to be taken to know that the other person does not consent to the sexual intercourse.(2) For the purposes of sections 61I and 61J and without limiting the grounds on which it may be established that consent to sexual intercourse is vitiated:(a) a person who consents to sexual intercourse with another person:(i) under a mistaken belief as to the identity of the other person, oris to be taken not to consent to the sexual intercourse, and(ii) under a mistaken belief that the other person is married to the person,(a1) a person who consents to sexual intercourse with another person under a mistaken belief that the sexual intercourse is for medical or hygienic purposes is taken not to consent to the sexual intercourse, and(b) a person who knows that another person consents to sexual intercourse under a mistaken belief referred to in paragraph (a) or (a1) is to be taken to know that the other person does not consent to the sexual intercourse, and(c) a person who submits to sexual intercourse with another person as a result of threats or terror, whether the threats are against, or the terror is instilled in, the person who submits to the sexual intercourse or any other person, is to be regarded as not consenting to the sexual intercourse, and(d) a person who does not offer actual physical resistance to sexual intercourse is not, by reason only of that fact, to be regarded as consenting to the sexual intercourse.s 61R: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3). Am 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (4).
61S Offenders who are minors
(1) For the purposes of any offence, a person is not, by reason only of age, to be presumed incapable of having sexual intercourse with another person or of having an intent to have sexual intercourse with another person.(2) Subsection (1) does not affect the operation of any law relating to the age at which a child can be convicted of an offence.s 61S: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3). Am 1997 No 85, Sch 1.2 [1].
61T Offender married to victim
The fact that a person is married to a person:(a) upon whom an offence under section 61I, 61J or 61K is alleged to have been committed is no bar to the firstmentioned person being convicted of the offence, or(b) upon whom an offence under any of those sections is alleged to have been attempted is no bar to the firstmentioned person being convicted of the attempt.s 61T: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
61U Circumstances of certain sexual offences to be considered in passing sentence
Where a person is convicted of:(a) both an offence under section 61I and an offence under section 61K, orwhether at the same time or at different times, the Judge passing sentence on the person in respect of the two convictions or the later of the two convictions is required, if it appears that the two offences arose substantially out of the one set of circumstances, to take that fact into account in passing sentence.(b) both an offence under section 61J and an offence under section 61K,s 61U: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (3).
62 Carnal knowledge—proof
s 62, hdg: Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (3).(1) “Carnal knowledge” shall, in every case under this Act, be deemed complete upon proof of penetration only.(2) In this Act, carnal knowledge includes sexual connection occasioned by the penetration of the anus of a female by the penis of any person, or the continuation of that sexual connection.s 62: Am 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (3).
63 Common law offences of rape and attempted rape abolished
The common law offences of rape and attempted rape are abolished.s 63: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (e). Subst 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (5).
64 Trial for rape—verdict of carnal knowledge
Where on the trial of a person for rape committed before the commencement of Schedule 1 to the Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981, the jury are satisfied that the female was a girl under the age of sixteen years, but above the age of ten years, and that the accused had carnal knowledge of her, but are not satisfied that carnal knowledge was had without her consent, they may acquit him of the rape charged and find him guilty of an offence under section 71, and he shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 64: Am 1910 No 2, sec 2. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (1); 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (6).
65 (Repealed)
s 65: Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (7).
65A Sexual intercourse procured by intimidation, coercion and other non-violent threats
(1) In this section:non-violent threat means intimidatory or coercive conduct, or other threat, which does not involve a threat of physical force.(2) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person shall, if the other person submits to the sexual intercourse as a result of a non-violent threat and could not in the circumstances be reasonably expected to resist the threat, be liable to penal servitude for 6 years.(3) A person does not commit an offence under this section unless the person knows that the person concerned submits to the sexual intercourse as a result of the non-violent threat.s 65A: Ins 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (6).
66 Procuring etc carnal knowledge by fraud
Whosoever:by any false pretence, false representation, or other fraudulent means, or by the use of any intoxicating drug, induces, or procures, a woman to have illicit carnal connection with a man, or by any such means has such connection with a woman, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.having by his language or conduct induced any woman to believe that he is her husband, when in fact he is not, has carnal knowledge of such woman with her consent while she is under such belief,
66A Sexual intercourse—child under 10
Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who is under the age of 10 years shall be liable to penal servitude for 20 years.ss 66A–66D: Ins 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (5).
66B Attempting, or assaulting with intent, to have sexual intercourse with child under 10
Any person who attempts to have sexual intercourse with another person who is under the age of 10 years, or assaults any such person with intent to have sexual intercourse, shall be liable to penal servitude for 20 years.ss 66A–66D: Ins 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (5).
66C Sexual intercourse—child between 10 and 16
(1) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who is of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 16 years, shall be liable to penal servitude for 8 years.(2) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who:(a) is of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 16 years, andshall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) is (whether generally or at the time of the sexual intercourse only) under the authority of the person,ss 66A–66D: Ins 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (5).
66D Attempting, or assaulting with intent, to have sexual intercourse with child between 10 and 16
Any person who attempts to commit an offence under section 66C upon another person who is of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 16 years, or assaults any such person with intent to commit such an offence, shall be liable to the penalty provided for the commission of the offence.ss 66A–66D: Ins 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (5).
66E Alternative verdicts
(1) Where on the trial of a person for an offence under section 66A the jury is not satisfied that the other person upon whom the offence was alleged to have been committed was under the age of 10 years, but is satisfied that:(a) the other person was under the age of 16 years, andit may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of an offence under section 66C (1), and the accused shall be liable to punishment accordingly.(b) the accused had sexual intercourse with the other person,(2) Where on the trial of a person for an offence under section 66A the jury is not satisfied that the other person upon whom the offence was alleged to have been committed was under the age of 10 years or that the accused had sexual intercourse with the other person, but is satisfied that:(a) the other person was under the age of 16 years, andit may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of an offence under section 66D, and the accused shall be liable to punishment accordingly.(b) the accused is guilty of an offence under section 66D,(3) Where on the trial of a person for an offence under section 66A the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 66B, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(4) Where on the trial of a person for an offence under section 66C the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 66D, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.s 66E: Ins 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (5). Am 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (4).
66F Sexual intercourse—intellectual disability
(1) In this section:intellectual disability means an appreciably below average general intellectual function that results in the person requiring supervision or social habilitation in connection with daily life activities.(2) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who:(a) has an intellectual disability, andshall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) is (whether generally or at the time of the sexual intercourse only) under the authority of the person in connection with any facility or programme providing services to persons who have intellectual disabilities,(3) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who has an intellectual disability, with the intention of taking advantage of the other person’s vulnerability to sexual exploitation, shall be liable to penal servitude for 8 years.(4) Any person who attempts to commit an offence under this section upon another person who has an intellectual disability shall be liable to the penalty provided for the commission of the offence.(5) A person does not commit an offence under this section unless the person knows that the person concerned has an intellectual disability.(6) No prosecution for an offence against this section shall be commenced without the approval of the Attorney General.s 66F: Ins 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (7).
67, 68 (Repealed)
s 67: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (f). Rep 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (6).
s 68: Rep 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (7).
69 Trial for carnal knowledge—girl in fact over 10
Where on the trial of a person for an offence under section 67 the jury are satisfied that the girl was of or above the age of ten years, but under the age of sixteen years, and that the accused had carnal knowledge of such girl, they may acquit him of the offence charged and find him guilty of an offence under section 71, and he shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 69: Am 1910 No 2, sec 2. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (8).
70 Trial for carnal knowledge—verdict of assault with intent
Where on the trial of a person for an offence under section 67 the jury are satisfied that the girl was of or above the age of ten years, but under the age of sixteen years, but are not satisfied that the accused had carnal knowledge of the girl, and are satisfied that he was guilty of an offence under section 72, they may acquit him of the offence charged and find him guilty of an offence under the said last-mentioned section, and he shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 70: Am 1910 No 2, sec 2. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (m); 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (9).
71–72A (Repealed)
s 71: Am 1910 No 2, sec 2. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Rep 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (10).
s 72: Am 1910 No 2, sec 2. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (n). Rep 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (11).
s 72A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Rep 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (8).
73 Carnal knowledge by teacher etc
Whosoever, being a schoolmaster or other teacher, or a father, or step-father, unlawfully and carnally knows any girl of or above the age of 16 years, and under the age of 17 years, being his pupil, or daughter, or step-daughter, shall be liable to penal servitude for 8 years.s 73: Am 1910 No 2, secs 2, 3. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (12); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (2).
74 Attempts
Whosoever, being a schoolmaster or other teacher, or a father, or step-father, by any means attempts unlawfully and carnally to know any girl of or above the age of 16 years, and under the age of 17 years, being his pupil, or daughter, or step-daughter, or assaults any such girl with intent carnally to know her, shall be liable to penal servitude for 8 years.s 74: Am 1910 No 2, sec 3. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (13); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (3).
75 Alternative charge
Nothing in section 73 or section 74 as respectively in force before the commencement of Schedule 2 to the Crimes (Child Assault) Amendment Act 1985 shall prevent such schoolmaster, teacher, father or step-father from being prosecuted under section 71 or 72.s 75: Am 1910 No 2, sec 3. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (14).
76, 76A (Repealed)
s 76: Am 1910 No 2, sec 3. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (o). Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (8).
s 76A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (p). Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (8).
77 Consent no defence in certain cases
(1) Except as provided by subsection (2), the consent of the child or other person to whom the charge relates shall be no defence to a charge under section 61E (1A), (2) or (2A), 61M (2), 61N (1) or 61O (1) or (2), 66A, 66B, 66C, 66D, 66F, 67, 68, 71, 72, 72A, 73, 74 or 76A or, if the child to whom the charge relates was under the age of 16 years at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed, to a charge under section 61E (1), 61L, 61M (1) or 76.(2) It shall be a sufficient defence to a charge which renders a person liable to be found guilty of an offence under section 61E (1A), (2) or (2A), 61N (1), 61O (1) or (2), 66C, 66D, 71, 72 or 76A or, if the child to whom the charge relates was under the age of 16 years at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed, to a charge under section 61E (1), 61L, 61M (1) or 76 if the person charged and the child to whom the charge relates are not both male and it is made to appear to the court or to the jury before whom the charge is brought that:(a) the child to whom the charge relates was over the age of 14 years at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed,(b) the child to whom the charge relates consented to the commission of the offence, and(c) the person so charged had, at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed, reasonable cause to believe, and did in fact believe, that the child to whom the charge relates was of or above the age of 16 years.s 77: Am 1910 No 2, sec 2. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (q); 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (9). Subst 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (15). Am 1987 No 184, Sch 2 (9); 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (5); 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [4] [5].
77A Proceedings in camera in certain cases
(1) This section applies to:(a) a prescribed sexual offence,(b) an offence under section 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 72A, 73, 74, 76, 76A, 78M, 78N, 78O, 78Q, 91D, 91E, 91F or 91G, and(c) an offence of attempting, or of conspiracy or incitement, to commit an offence referred to in paragraph (b).(2) Any proceedings, or any part of any proceedings, in respect of an offence to which this section applies shall, if the Court so directs, be held in camera.(3) If the Court makes a direction under this section, it may (either absolutely or subject to conditions) exempt any person from that direction to the extent necessary to allow that person to be present as a support for a person giving evidence or for any other purpose which the Court thinks fit.(4) The Court may make a direction under this section on its own motion or at the request of any party.(5) In determining whether to make a direction under this section the Court shall consider:(a) the need of the complainant to have any person excluded from those proceedings,(b) the need of the complainant to have any person present in those proceedings,(c) the interests of justice, and(d) any other matter which the Court thinks relevant.(6) In this section:complainant, in relation to any proceedings, means the person, or any of the persons, upon whom the offence with which the accused person stands charged in those proceedings, is alleged to have been committed and includes:(a) in relation to an offence under section 91D, 91E or 91F, the person under the age of 18 years who is alleged to have participated in an act of child prostitution, and(b) in relation to an offence under section 91G, the person under the age of 18 years who is alleged to have been used for pornographic purposes.s 77A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (r). Subst 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (10). Am 1985 No 149, Schs 1 (1), 2 (16). Subst 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (2). Am 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (2); 1997 No 142, Sch 1 [1].
78 (Repealed)
s 78: Am 1911 No 21, sec 3. Subst 1924 No 10, sec 5 (b). Am 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (11); 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (17). Rep 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (5).
78A Incest
Whosoever, being a male, has carnal knowledge of a female of or above the age of 16 years who is his mother, sister, daughter, or granddaughter, or being a female of or above the age of sixteen years, with her consent permits her grandfather, father, brother, or son to have carnal knowledge of her (whether in any such case the relationship is of half or full blood, or is or is not traced through lawful wedlock) shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.s 78A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 6. Am 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (18).
78B Incest attempts
Whosoever, being a male, attempts to commit any offence under section 78A, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.s 78B: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 6. Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
78C Defences
(1) It shall be a sufficient defence to a charge under section 78A or section 78B that the person charged did not know that the person with whom the offence is alleged to have been committed was related to him or her, as alleged.(2) It shall be no defence to a charge under section 78A or section 78B that the person with whom the offence is alleged to have been committed consented thereto.s 78C: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 6. Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
78D Removal from guardianship etc
On the conviction of a father or step-father of an offence under section 73 or section 74 or of a male person of an offence under section 72A or under section 78A or under section 78B, the court may divest the offender of all authority over the female with whom the offence has been committed and, if the offender is the guardian of such female, may remove the offender from such guardianship, and in any such case may appoint any person or persons to be the guardian or guardians of such female during her minority, or for any greater or less period.s 78D: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 6.
78E Rape or attempt—verdict of incest or attempt
If on the trial of any male person for an offence under section 63 or 65 the jury are not satisfied that he is guilty of the offence charged, but are satisfied that he is guilty of an offence under section 78A or under section 78B, they may acquit such person of the offence charged, and find him guilty of an offence under section 78A or under section 78B, and he shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 78E: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 6. Am 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (12); 1985 No 149, Sch 2 (19).
78F Sanction of Attorney-General
(1) No prosecution for an offence under sections 78A or 78B shall be commenced without the sanction of the Attorney-General.(2) All proceedings under the said sections shall be held in camera.s 78F: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 6.
78G Definition of “homosexual intercourse” for sections 78H–78Q
In sections 78H–78Q, homosexual intercourse means:(a) sexual connection occasioned by the penetration of the anus of any male person by the penis of any person,(b) sexual connection occasioned by the introduction of any part of the penis of a person into the mouth of another male person, or(c) the continuation of homosexual intercourse as defined in paragraph (a) or (b).s 78G: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4). Am 1984 No 153, Sch 16.
78H Homosexual intercourse with male under 10
(cf s 67)
A male person who has homosexual intercourse with a male person under the age of 10 years shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 78H: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4). Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (17).
78I Attempt, or assault with intent, to have homosexual intercourse with male under 10
(cf s 68)
A male person who attempts to have homosexual intercourse with a male person under the age of 10 years, or assaults any such male person with intent to have homosexual intercourse with him, shall be liable to penal servitude for 14 years.ss 78I–78L: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78J Trial for homosexual intercourse offence—male in fact between 10 and 18
(cf ss 69, 70)
(1) Where on the trial of a male person for having homosexual intercourse with a male person under the age of 10 years, the jury is satisfied that the secondmentioned person was of or above that age, but under the age of 18 years, and that the accused had homosexual intercourse with that person, it may acquit him of the offence charged and find him guilty of an offence under section 78K, and he shall be liable to punishment accordingly.(2) Where on the trial of a male person for having homosexual intercourse with a male person under the age of 10 years, the jury is satisfied that the secondmentioned person was of or above that age, but under the age of 18 years, but is not satisfied that the accused had homosexual intercourse with that person, and is satisfied that he was guilty of an offence under section 78L, it may acquit him of the offence charged and find him guilty of an offence under section 78L, and he shall be liable to punishment accordingly.ss 78I–78L: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78K Homosexual intercourse with male between 10 and 18
(cf s 71)
A male person who has homosexual intercourse with a male person of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 18 years, shall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.ss 78I–78L: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78L Attempt, or assault with intent, to have homosexual intercourse with male between 10 and 18
(cf s 72)
A male person who attempts to have homosexual intercourse with a male person of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 18 years, or assaults any such male person with intent to have homosexual intercourse with him, shall be liable to penal servitude for 5 years.ss 78I–78L: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78M (Repealed)
s 78M: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4). Rep 1987 No 184, Sch 1 (10).
78N Homosexual intercourse by teacher etc
(cf s 73)
A male person who, being a schoolmaster or other teacher, or a father, or step-father, has homosexual intercourse with any male person of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 18 years, being his pupil, son or step-son, shall be liable to penal servitude for 14 years.ss 78N–78P: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78O Attempt, or assault with intent, to have homosexual intercourse with pupil etc
(cf s 74)
A male person who, being a schoolmaster or other teacher, or a father, or step-father, by any means attempts to have homosexual intercourse with any male person of or above the age of 10 years, and under the age of 18 years, being his pupil, son or step-son, shall be liable to penal servitude for 7 years.ss 78N–78P: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78P Alternative charge
(cf s 75)
Nothing in section 78N or 78O prevents a schoolmaster, teacher, father or step-father from being prosecuted under section 78K or 78L.ss 78N–78P: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78Q Acts of gross indecency
(cf s 81A)
(1) Any male person who commits, or is a party to the commission of, an act of gross indecency with or towards a male person under the age of 18 years shall be liable to imprisonment for 2 years.(2) Any person who solicits, procures, incites or advises any male person under the age of 18 years to commit or to be a party to the commission of an act of homosexual intercourse, or an act of gross indecency, with or towards a male person shall be liable to imprisonment for 2 years.s 78Q: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4). Am 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (6).
78R Consent no defence in certain cases
(cf s 77)
The consent of a male person the subject of the charge shall be no defence to any charge under section 78H, 78I, 78K, 78L, 78M, 78N, 78O or 78Q.s 78R: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4).
78S (Repealed)
s 78S: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4). Rep 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (3).
78T Limitations
(cf ss 78, 78F)
(1) (Repealed)(2) No prosecution for an offence under section 78H, 78I, 78K, 78L, 78M, 78N, 78O or 78Q or for an offence of attempting, or of conspiracy or incitement, to commit an offence under any of those sections shall, if the accused was at the time of the alleged offence under the age of 18 years, be commenced without the sanction of the Attorney General.s 78T: Ins 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (4). Am 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (7).
79 Bestiality
Any person who commits an act of bestiality with any animal shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.s 79, hdg: Rep 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (5).s 79: Am 1924 No 10, sec 5 (c); 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (6).
80 Attempt to commit bestiality
Any person who attempts to commit an act of bestiality with any animal shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.s 80: Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (f); 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (7).
80A Sexual assault by forced self-manipulation
(1) In this section:self-manipulation means the penetration of the vagina (including a surgically constructed vagina) or anus of any person by an object manipulated by the person, except where the penetration is carried out for proper medical or other proper purposes.threat means:(a) a threat of physical force, or(b) intimidatory or coercive conduct, or other threat, which does not involve a threat of physical force.(2) Any person who compels, by means of a threat, another person to engage in self-manipulation and the other person could not in the circumstances be reasonably expected to resist the threat, is liable to penal servitude for 14 years or, if the other person is under the age of 10 years, to penal servitude for 20 years.(3) A person does not commit an offence under this section unless the person knows that the other person engages in the self-manipulation as a result of the threat.s 80A: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (6). Am 1996 No 22, Sch 3 (2).
81–81B (Repealed)
s 81: Rep 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (8).
s 81A: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 3 (a). Rep 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (8).
s 81B: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 3 (a). Rep 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (8).
Misconduct with regard to corpses
81C Misconduct with regard to corpses
Any person who:(a) indecently interferes with any dead human body, orshall be liable to imprisonment for two years.(b) improperly interferes with, or offers any indignity to, any dead human body or human remains (whether buried or not),s 81C and subhdg: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 5 (s).
Attempts to procure abortion
82 Administering drugs etc to herself by woman with child
Whosoever, being a woman with child,unlawfully administers to herself any drug or noxious thing, orwith intent in any such case to procure her miscarriage,unlawfully uses any instrument or other means,
shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
83 Administering drugs etc to woman with intent
Whosoever:unlawfully administers to, or causes to be taken by, any woman, whether with child or not, any drug or noxious thing, orwith intent in any such case to procure her miscarriage,unlawfully uses any instrument or other means,
shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
84 Procuring drugs etc
Whosoever unlawfully supplies or procures any drug or noxious thing, or any instrument or thing whatsoever, knowing that the same is intended to be unlawfully used with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, whether with child or not, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
Concealing birth of a child
85 Concealment of birth
(1) Whosoever by any disposition of the dead body of a child, whether the child died before or after or during its birth, wilfully conceals or attempts to conceal the birth of the child, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.(2) It shall be a sufficient defence to any charge under this section if the accused person shall satisfy the court or jury that the dead body in respect of which the disposition took place had issued from the body of its mother before the expiration of the twenty-eighth week of pregnancy.s 85: Subst 1924 No 10, sec 7.
Abduction
86 Abduction of woman against her will
Whosoever, from motives of lucre, takes away, or detains, against her will, a female of any age who has an interest in property or is a presumptive heiress or next of kin to any one having such interest, with intent to marry or carnally know her, or to cause her to be married, or carnally known, by any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
87 The like against the will of parent etc
Whosoever fraudulently allures, takes away, or detains any female under the age of twenty-one years, out of the possession and against the will of any person having the lawful charge of her, with intent to marry or carnally know her, or to cause her to be married to or carnally known by any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.
88 In such cases property of woman to remain hers
No offender under section 86 or section 87 shall be capable of taking any estate or interest in any property in right of any such female, and if any marriage has taken place, the property of the wife shall be settled in such manner as the Supreme Court, at the suit of the Attorney General, may appoint.s 88: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
89 Forcible abduction of a woman
Whosoever by force takes away, or detains against her will, any female of any age, with intent to marry or carnally know her, or to cause her to be married to or carnally known by any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
90 Abduction of girl under 16
Whosoever unlawfully takes, or causes to be taken, any unmarried girl under the age of sixteen years, out of the possession and against the will of any person having the lawful charge of her, shall be liable to imprisonment for three years.
90A Kidnapping
Whosoever leads takes or entices away or detains a person with intent to hold him or her for ransom or for any other advantage to any person shall be liable to penal servitude for twenty years or, if it is proved to the satisfaction of the judge that the person so led taken enticed away or detained was thereafter liberated without having sustained any substantial injury, to penal servitude for fourteen years.This section does not apply to any person who shall, in good faith, have claimed a right to the possession of a person so led, taken or enticed away or detained.s 90A: Ins 1961 No 70, sec 2 (a).
91 Taking child with intent to steal etc
Whosoever:by force or fraud, leads or takes away, entices away, or detains, any child under the age of twelve years, with intent to deprive any person having the lawful charge of such child of the possession of such child, or with intent to steal any article upon or about the person of such child, to whomsoever such article may belong, orshall be liable to penal servitude for ten years:receives or harbours any such child, knowing such child to have been so led, taken, enticed away, or detained,Provided that this section shall not extend to any person who shall, in good faith, have claimed a right to the possession of such child.
91A Procuring etc
Whosoever procures, entices or leads away any person (not being a prostitute), whether with that person’s consent or not for purposes of prostitution, either within or without New South Wales, shall, notwithstanding that some one or more of the various acts constituting the offence may have been committed outside New South Wales, be liable to penal servitude for seven years.s 91A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 8. Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (t); 1979 No 72, Sch 2 (1).
91B Procuring person by drugs etc
Whosoever by means of any fraud, violence, threat, or abuse of authority, or by the use of any drug or intoxicating liquor, procures, entices, or leads away any person for purposes of prostitution, either within or without New South Wales, shall, notwithstanding that some one or more of the various acts constituting the offence may have been committed outside New South Wales, be liable to penal servitude for ten years.s 91B: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 8. Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (u).
Child prostitution and pornography
91C Definitions of “act of child prostitution”, “child”
For the purposes of sections 91C–91G:act of child prostitution means any sexual service, whether or not involving an indecent act:(a) that is provided by a child for the payment of money or the provision of any other material thing (whether or not it is in fact paid or provided to the child or to any other person), andand includes (but is not limited to) sexual activity between persons of different sexes or the same sex, comprising sexual intercourse (as defined in section 61H) for payment or masturbation committed by one person on another for payment, engaged in by a child.(b) that can reasonably be considered to be aimed at the sexual arousal or sexual gratification of a person or persons other than the child,child means a person who is under the age of 18 years.s 91C: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 8. Rep 1968 No 32, sec 4. Ins 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (3). Am 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (7).
91D Promoting or engaging in acts of child prostitution
(1) Any person who:(a) by any means, causes or induces a child to participate in an act of child prostitution, oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years or, if the child is under the age of 14 years, to penal servitude for 14 years.(b) participates as a client with a child in an act of child prostitution,(2) Except where the child and the other person alleged to have participated in the act of child prostitution are both male, a person is not guilty of an offence under this section if the person satisfies the court:(a) that the child was not under the age of 14 years when the offence is alleged to have been committed, and(b) that the child consented to the act of child prostitution, and(c) that the person had, when the offence is alleged to have been committed, reasonable cause to believe, and did in fact believe, that the child was a person of or above the age of 18 years.(3) The consent of a child is not a defence to a charge relating to an offence under this section, except as provided by subsection (2).s 91D: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 8. Subst 1951 No 31, sec 2 (g). Am 1974 No 50, sec 5 (v). Rep 1979 No 72, Sch 2 (2). Ins 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (3).
91E Obtaining benefit from child prostitution
(1) Any person who receives money or any other material benefit knowing that it is derived directly or indirectly from an act of child prostitution is liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(2) A person is not guilty of an offence under this section if the person satisfies the court that the money or other material benefit concerned:(a) was received by the person for the lawful provision of goods or services, or(b) was paid or provided in accordance with a judgment or an order of a court or a legislative requirement, whether or not under New South Wales law.s 91E: Ins 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (3).
91F Premises not to be used for child prostitution
(1) Any person who is capable of exercising lawful control over premises at which a child participates in an act of child prostitution is liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(2) For the purposes of this section, each person:(a) who is an owner, lessee, licensee or occupier of premises,is to be considered as capable of exercising lawful control over the premises, whether or not any other person is capable of exercising lawful control over the premises.(b) who is concerned in the management of premises or in controlling the entry of persons to, or their movement within, premises,(3) A person is not guilty of an offence under this section relating to an act of child prostitution if the person satisfies the court:(a) that the person did not know about the act, or(b) that the person did not know that a child was participating in the act or, for any other reason, did not know that the act was an act of child prostitution, or(c) that the person used all due diligence to prevent the child from participating in the act.s 91F: Ins 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (3).
91G Children not to be used for pornographic purposes
(1) Any person:(a) who uses a child for pornographic purposes, or(b) who causes or procures a child to be so used, oris liable to penal servitude for 5 years or, if the child is under the age of 14 years, to penal servitude for 7 years.(c) who, having the care (but not necessarily entitled by law to have the custody) of a child, consents to the child being so used or allows the child to be so used,(2) For the purposes of this section, a child is used by a person for pornographic purposes if:(a) the child is engaged in activity of a sexual nature (for example, actual or simulated sexual intercourse or a striptease) for the purpose of the production of pornography by that person, or(b) the child is in the presence of another person engaged in such an activity for that purpose.s 91G: Ins 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (3). Am 1997 No 142, Sch 1 [2]–[4].
Bigamy
92 Bigamy
Whosoever, being married, marries another person during the life of the former husband or wife, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years:Provided that no person shall be convicted under this section whose husband or wife has at the time of such second marriage been continually absent from such person for the space of seven years, or, if domiciled in New South Wales at the time of the first marriage, has been continually absent from New South Wales for the space of five years then last past, and was, on reasonable grounds, believed by the accused at the time of the second marriage not to be living, of which facts the proof shall lie on the accused.Editorial note—See Marriage Act 1961 (Commonwealth), section 94.
93 Participator in bigamy
Whosoever, whether married or unmarried, marries the husband or wife of any person not continually so absent, as in the proviso to section 92 mentioned, knowing him or her to be married, and the former wife or husband to be alive, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.Editorial note—See Marriage Act 1961 (Commonwealth), section 94.s 93: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
Part 3A Offences relating to public order
pt 3A: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 1 (2).
93A Definition
In this Part:violence means any violent conduct, so that:(a) except for the purposes of section 93C, it includes violent conduct towards property as well as violent conduct towards persons, and(b) it is not restricted to conduct causing or intended to cause injury or damage but includes any other violent conduct (for example, throwing at or towards a person a missile of a kind capable of causing injury which does not hit or falls short).s 93A: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Am 1970 No 50, sec 4 (a). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 1 (2).
93B Riot
(1) Where 12 or more persons who are present together use or threaten unlawful violence for a common purpose and the conduct of them (taken together) is such as would cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his or her personal safety, each of the persons using unlawful violence for the common purpose is guilty of riot and liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(2) It is immaterial whether or not the 12 or more persons use or threaten unlawful violence simultaneously.(3) The common purpose may be inferred from conduct.(4) No person of reasonable firmness need actually be, or be likely to be, present at the scene.(5) Riot may be committed in private as well as in public places.ss 93B–93E: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 1 (2).
93C Affray
(1) A person who uses or threatens unlawful violence towards another and whose conduct is such as would cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his or her personal safety is guilty of affray and liable to penal servitude for 5 years.(2) If 2 or more persons use or threaten the unlawful violence, it is the conduct of them taken together that must be considered for the purposes of subsection (1).(3) For the purposes of this section, a threat cannot be made by the use of words alone.(4) No person of reasonable firmness need actually be, or be likely to be, present at the scene.(5) Affray may be committed in private as well as in public places.ss 93B–93E: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 1 (2).
93D Mental element under sections 93B and 93C
(1) A person is guilty of riot only if the person intends to use violence or is aware that his or her conduct may be violent.(2) A person is guilty of affray only if the person intends to use or threaten violence or is aware that his or her conduct may be violent or threaten violence.(3) Subsection (1) does not affect the determination for the purposes of riot of the number of persons who use or threaten violence.ss 93B–93E: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 1 (2).
93E Offences of riot, rout, affray abolished
The common law offences of riot, rout and affray are abolished.ss 93B–93E: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 1 (2).
Part 3B Offences relating to firearms etc
pt 3B: Ins 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (3).
93F Definition
In this Part:firearm has the same meaning as in the Firearms Act 1996.s 93F: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (3). Am 1992 No 13, Sch 5 (1); 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [4].
93G Causing danger with firearm or spear gun
(1) Any person who:(a) possesses a loaded firearm or loaded spear gun:(i) in a public place, or(ii) in any other place so as to endanger the life of any other person, or(b) fires a firearm or spear gun in or near a public place, oris liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(c) carries or fires a firearm or spear gun in a manner likely to injure, or endanger the safety of, himself or herself or any other person or any property, or with disregard for the safety of himself or herself or any other person,(2) For the purposes of this section:(a) a firearm is to be regarded as being loaded if there is ammunition:(i) in its chamber or barrel, or(ii) in any magazine or other device which is in such a position that the ammunition can be fitted into its chamber or barrel by operation of some other part of the firearm, and(b) a spear gun is to be regarded as being loaded if a spear, or an instrument or thing similar to a spear, is fitted to it.(3) A person is not guilty of an offence under this section for possessing or doing anything referred to in subsection (1) if the person satisfies the court that he or she had a reasonable excuse for possessing it or doing it or possessed it or did it for a lawful purpose.s 93G: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (3).
93H Trespassing with or dangerous use of firearm or spear gun
(1) A person who, possessing a firearm, imitation firearm, spear gun or imitation spear gun, enters any building or land (other than a road), unless the person:(a) is the owner or occupier of the building or land or has the permission of the owner or occupier, or(b) does so with a reasonable excuse, oris liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(c) does so for a lawful purpose,(2) A person who fires a firearm or spear gun in or into any building or on or on to any land, unless the person:(a) is the owner or occupier of the building or land or has the permission of the owner or occupier, or(b) does so with a reasonable excuse, oris liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(c) does so for a lawful purpose,(3) The onus of proving the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a), (b) and (c) and subsection (2) (a), (b) and (c) lies with the defendant.s 93H: Ins 1946 No 43, sec 4 (b). Am 1970 No 50, sec 4 (b). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2. Ins 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (3). Subst 1992 No 13, Sch 5 (2).
93I (Repealed)
s 93I: Ins 1951 No 31, sec 2 (h) (i). Rep 1973 No 38, Sch 2.
Part 3C Public order offences relating to contamination of goods
pt 3C: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
93IA Definitions of “contaminate” and “goods”
(1) In this Part:contaminate goods includes:(a) interfere with the goods, or(b) making it appear that the goods have been contaminated or interfered with.goods includes any substance or article:(a) whether or not for human consumption, and(b) whether natural or manufactured, and(c) whether or not incorporated or mixed with other goods.(2) In this Part, a reference to economic loss caused through public awareness of the contamination of goods includes a reference to economic loss caused through:(a) members of the public not purchasing or using those goods or similar goods, or(b) steps taken to avoid public alarm or anxiety about those goods or similar goods.s 93IA: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
93IB Contaminating goods with intent to cause public alarm or economic loss
A person who contaminates goods with the intention of:(a) causing public alarm or anxiety, oris liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(b) causing economic loss through public awareness of the contamination,s 93IB: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2]. Am 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [5].
93IC Threatening to contaminate goods with intent to cause public alarm or economic loss
(1) A person who makes a threat that goods will be contaminated with the intention of:(a) causing public alarm or anxiety, oris liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(b) causing economic loss through public awareness of the contamination,(2) For the purposes of this section, a threat may be made by any act, and may be explicit or implicit and conditional or unconditional.ss 93IC–93IG: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
93ID Making false statements concerning contamination of goods with intent to cause public alarm or economic loss
(1) A person who makes a statement that the person believes to be false:(a) with the intention of inducing the person to whom the statement is made or others to believe that goods have been contaminated, andis liable to imprisonment for 10 years.(b) with the intention of thereby:(i) causing public alarm or anxiety, or(ii) causing economic loss through public awareness of the contamination,(2) For the purposes of this section, making a statement includes conveying information by any means.ss 93IC–93IG: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
93IE Aggravated circumstances—unwarranted demand
(1) A person is guilty of an offence against this section if the person commits an offence under section 93IB, 93IC or 93ID in connection with an unwarranted demand by the person. An unwarranted demand is a demand that the person believes he or she does not have any reasonable grounds for making.(2) A person convicted of an offence against this section is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(3) If on the trial of a person for an offence against this section the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 93IB, 93IC or 93ID, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.ss 93IC–93IG: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
93IF Aggravated circumstances—death or grievous bodily harm
(1) A person is guilty of an offence against this section if the person commits an offence against section 93IB or 93IC and:(a) the contamination of the goods causes the death of any person or grievous bodily harm to any person, or(b) the person intends by that contamination to cause such death or harm.(2) A person convicted of an offence against this section is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(3) If on the trial of a person for an offence against this section the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 93IB or 93IC, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.ss 93IC–93IG: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
93IG Special provisions relating to territorial application of this Part
(1) A person commits an offence against a provision of this Part if:(a) the person does an act outside the State that constitutes the offence, and(b) (apart from this section) the act would have constituted the offence had it been done within this State, and(c) the offence involves intending to cause public alarm or anxiety, or economic loss, within the State.(2) A person who commits an offence by the operation of this section may be dealt with, and is liable to the same punishment, as if the person had committed the offence within the State.(3) If an offence against a provision of this Part involves intending to cause public alarm or anxiety, or economic loss, within the State, a territorial nexus between the State and any other element of the offence is not required.(4) The other provisions of this Act, the provisions of other Acts and the common law, in so far as these are applicable, apply to an offence to which this section applies as if it had been committed within the State (for example, section 344A and the rules of law relating to attempts to commit offences apply to such an offence).(5) This section is in addition to and does not derogate from any other basis on which the courts of the State may exercise criminal jurisdiction.ss 93IC–93IG: Ins 1997 No 89, Sch 1 [2].
Part 4 Offences relating to property
Chapter 1 Stealing and like offences
GENERAL
93J Property previously stolen
Where on the trial of a person for any offence which includes the stealing of any property it appears that the property was, at the time when it was taken by the accused, already out of the possession of the owner by reason of its having been previously stolen, the accused may be convicted of the offence charged notwithstanding that it is not proved that the taking by him or her amounted to an interference with the right to possession of, or a trespass against, the owner.s 93J and subhdg: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 6 (a).
ROBBERY
94 Robbery or stealing from the person
Whosoever:robs or assaults with intent to rob any person, orshall, except where a greater punishment is provided by this Act, be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.steals any chattel, money, or valuable security from the person of another,s 94: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (a).
95 Same in circumstances of aggravation
(1) Whosoever robs, or assaults with intent to rob, any person, or steals any chattel, money, or valuable security, from the person of another, in circumstances of aggravation, shall be liable to penal servitude for twenty years.(2) In this section, circumstances of aggravation means circumstances that (immediately before, or at the time of, or immediately after the robbery, assault or larceny) involve any one or more of the following:(a) the alleged offender uses corporal violence on any person,(b) the alleged offender maliciously inflicts actual bodily harm on any person,(c) the alleged offender deprives any person of his or her liberty.s 95: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (b); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (3).
96 Same (robbery) with wounding
Whosoever commits any offence under section 95, and thereby wounds or inflicts grievous bodily harm on any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 96: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (18); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (4).
97 Robbery etc or stopping a mail, being armed or in company
(1) Whosoever, being armed with an offensive weapon, or instrument, or being in company with another person,robs, or assaults with intent to rob, any person, orshall be liable to penal servitude for twenty years.stops any mail, or vehicle, railway train, or person conveying a mail, with intent to rob, or search the same,(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) when armed with a dangerous weapon. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(3) Alternative verdict If on the trial of a person for an offence under subsection (2) the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under subsection (1), it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.s 97: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (c); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (5).
98 Robbery with arms etc and wounding
Whosoever, being armed with an offensive weapon, or instrument, or being in company with another person, robs, or assaults with intent to rob, any person, and immediately before, or at the time of, or immediately after, such robbery, or assault, wounds, or inflicts grievous bodily harm upon, such person, shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 98: Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (19); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (6).
EXTORTION, &c, BY MENACE OR THREAT
99 Demanding money with intent to steal
Whosoever, with menaces, or by force, demands any property from any person, with intent to steal the same, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.s 99: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (b).
100 Letter demanding money etc with menaces
Whosoever sends, delivers, or utters, or directly or indirectly causes to be received, knowing the contents thereof, any letter or writing demanding any property of any person, with menaces or any threat, and without reasonable cause, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
100A Blackmail by threat to publish etc
(1) Whosoever with intent to cause gain for himself or herself or any other person, or with intent to procure for himself or herself or any other person any appointment or office, or with intent to cause loss to any person:(a) makes any unwarranted demand, andshall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.(b) supports that demand by making:(i) any unwarranted threat to publish,(ii) any unwarranted proposal to abstain from publishing, orany matter or thing concerning any person (whether living or dead),(iii) any unwarranted offer to prevent the publication of,(2) For the purposes of this section:(a) publish means communicate to any person,(b) a demand is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief that he or she has reasonable grounds for making it,(c) a threat, proposal or offer in support of a demand is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief that it is a proper means of supporting the demand,(d) gain means gain in money or other property, whether temporary or permanent, and includes a gain by keeping what one has, as well as a gain by getting what one has not, and(e) loss means loss in money or other property, whether temporary or permanent, and includes a loss by not getting what one might get, as well as a loss by parting with what one has.s 100A: Ins 1974 No 18, Sch 1.
101 Threatening letters
Whosoever sends, delivers, or utters, or directly or indirectly causes to be received, knowing the contents thereof, any letter or writing accusing or threatening to accuse a person of felony, or of having committed, or attempted to commit, an infamous crime as defined in section 104, or of having committed an offence against decency in a public place, with intent in any such case to extort or gain property from any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.ss 101–103: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
102 Accusing or threatening to accuse of crime to extort money etc
Whosoever, in any manner, by words or otherwise, accuses, or threatens to accuse, either the person to whom such accusation or threat is made, or some other person, of any such crime or offence as is referred to in section 101, with intent in any such case to extort or gain property from any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.ss 101–103: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
103 Causing a person by violence or threats to execute deeds etc
Whosoever by unlawful violence to, or restraint of the body of, any person, or by any threat of such violence, or restraint, or by accusing or threatening to accuse a person of any such infamous crime as is defined in section 104, compels, or induces, any person to execute, make, accept, indorse, alter, or destroy, the whole or any part of any valuable security, or to write, impress, or affix, any name or seal upon, or to, any paper or parchment, with intent in any such case to defraud, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.ss 101–103: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
104 Term “infamous crime” defined
For the purposes of sections 101, 102 and 103 the term infamous crime shall include offences under sections 61B–61D, the crimes of rape, and buggery, or bestiality, with mankind, or an animal, and every assault with intent to commit, or attempt to commit, any such offence or crime, and every solicitation, promise, or threat, offered, or made, to any person whereby to induce the person to commit, or permit, any such offence or crime.s 104: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1985 No 231, Sch 31.
105 Menace may be of violence or accusation etc
It shall be immaterial whether any such menace or threat, as is referred to in sections 99 to 103 both inclusive, is of violence, or injury, or of an accusation to be caused, or made, by the offender, or by any other person, or whether the accusation, if made, shall purport to be that of the offender, or some other person.s 105: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
SACRILEGE AND HOUSEBREAKING
105A Definitions
(1) In sections 106–115A:circumstances of aggravation means circumstances involving any one or more of the following:(a) the alleged offender is armed with an offensive weapon, or instrument,(b) the alleged offender is in the company of another person or persons,(c) the alleged offender uses corporal violence on any person,(d) the alleged offender maliciously inflicts actual bodily harm on any person,(e) the alleged offender deprives any person of his or her liberty,(f) the alleged offender knows that there is a person, or that there are persons, in the place where the offence is alleged to be committed.circumstances of special aggravation means circumstances involving either or both of the following:(a) the alleged offender wounds or maliciously inflicts grievous bodily harm on any person,(b) the alleged offender is armed with a dangerous weapon.(2) The matters referred to in:(a) paragraph (c), (d) or (e) of the definition of circumstances of aggravation, orcan occur immediately before, or at the time of, or immediately after any of the elements of the offence concerned occurred.(b) paragraph (a) of the definition of circumstances of special aggravation,(2A) For the purposes of paragraph (f) of the definition of circumstances of aggravation, if there was a person, or there were persons, in the place in relation to which an offence is alleged to have been committed at the time it was committed, the defendant is presumed to have known that fact unless the defendant satisfies the court that he or she had reasonable grounds for believing that there was no one in the place.(3) The definitions in subsection (1) are not mutually exclusive.s 105A: Ins 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (7). Am 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [6] [7].
106 Breaking and entering place of Divine worship and committing felony
s 106, subhdg: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (c).(1) Whosoever:breaks and enters any place of Divine worship and commits any felony therein, or,shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.being in any place of Divine worship, commits any felony therein and breaks out of the same,(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.(3) Specially aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (2) in circumstances of special aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 106: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (d); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (8).
107 The like with intent to commit felony
(1) Whosoever breaks and enters any place of Divine worship, with intent to commit felony therein, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(3) Specially aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (2) in circumstances of special aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.s 107: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (e); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (9).
108 (Repealed)
s 108: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (f). Rep 1974 No 50, sec 6 (d).
109 Entering with intent, or stealing etc in dwelling-house and breaking out
(1) Whosoever:enters the dwelling-house of another, with intent to commit felony therein, or,and in either case breaks out of the said dwelling-house shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.being in such dwelling-house commits any felony therein,(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.(3) Specially aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (2) in circumstances of special aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 109: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (g); 1974 No 50, sec 6 (e); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (10).
110 Breaking, entering and assaulting with intent to murder etc
Whosoever breaks and enters any dwelling-house, or any building appurtenant thereto, and while therein or on premises occupied therewith assaults with intent to murder any person, or inflicts grievous bodily harm upon any person, shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 110: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (g); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (20).
111 Entering dwelling-house
(1) Whosoever enters any dwelling-house, with intent to commit felony therein, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(3) Specially aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (2) in circumstances of special aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.s 111: Am 1966 No 48, sec 2 (h); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (11).
112 Breaking etc into any house etc and committing felony
(1) Whosoever:breaks and enters any dwelling-house, or any building within the curtilage of any dwelling-house and occupied therewith but not being part thereof, or any school-house, shop, warehouse, or counting-house, office, store, garage, pavilion, factory, or workshop, or any building belonging to His Majesty or to any Government department, or to any municipal or other public authority, and commits any felony therein, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.being in any dwelling-house, or any such building as aforesaid, or any school-house, shop, warehouse, or counting-house, office, store, garage, pavilion, factory or workshop, or any building belonging to His Majesty or to any Government department, or to any municipal or other public authority, commits any felony therein and breaks out of the same,(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.(3) Specially aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (2) in circumstances of special aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.s 112: Am 1924 No 10, sec 9 (a); 1966 No 48, sec 2 (i); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (12).
113 Breaking etc into any house etc with intent to commit felony
(1) Whosoever breaks and enters any dwelling-house, or any building within the curtilage of any dwelling-house, or any school-house, shop, warehouse, or counting-house, office, store, garage, pavilion, factory, or workshop, or any building belonging to His Majesty, or to any Government department, or to any municipal or other public authority, with intent to commit felony therein, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.(2) Aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(3) Specially aggravated offence A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (2) in circumstances of special aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to penal servitude for 20 years.s 113: Am 1924 No 10, sec 9 (a); 1966 No 48, sec 2 (j); 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (13).
114 Being armed etc with intent to commit offence
(1) Any person who:(a) is armed with any weapon, or instrument, with intent to commit an indictable offence or to enter a building and to commit a misdemeanour therein,(b) has in his or her possession, without lawful excuse, any implement of housebreaking or safebreaking, or any implement capable of being used to enter or drive or enter and drive a conveyance,(c) has his or her face blackened or otherwise disguised, or has in his or her possession the means of blacking or otherwise disguising his or her face, with intent to commit a felony or misdemeanour,shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.(d) enters or remains in or upon any part of a building or any land occupied or used in connection therewith with intent to commit a felony or misdemeanour in or upon the building,(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) (b) conveyance means any cab, carriage, motor car, caravan, trailer, motor lorry, omnibus, motor or other bicycle, or any ship, or vessel, whether decked or undecked, used in or intended for navigation, and drive shall be construed accordingly.s 114: Am 1924 No 10, sec 9 (b); 1966 No 48, sec 2 (k). Subst 1974 No 50, sec 6 (f). Am 1979 No 72, Sch 3.
115 The like after a previous conviction
Whosoever, having been convicted of any felony or misdemeanour, afterwards commits any offence mentioned in section 114, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.s 115: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1966 No 48, sec 2 (l).
115A Alternative verdicts
(1) Aggravated offence reduced to basic offence If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 106 (2), 107 (2), 109 (2), 111 (2), 112 (2) or 113 (2) the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 106 (1), 107 (1), 109 (1), 111 (1), 112 (1) or 113 (1) as appropriate, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(2) Specially aggravated offence reduced to aggravated offence If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 106 (3), 107 (3), 109 (3), 111 (3), 112 (3) or 113 (3) the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 106 (2), 107 (2), 109 (2), 111 (2), 112 (2) or 113 (2) as appropriate, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(3) Specially aggravated offence reduced to basic offence If on the trial of a person for an offence under section 106 (3), 107 (3), 109 (3), 111 (3), 112 (3) or 113 (3) the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence charged, but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 106 (1), 107 (1), 109 (1), 111 (1), 112 (1) or 113 (1) as appropriate, it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly. This subsection does not apply to an offence if the jury proceeds under subsection (2) in relation to it.s 115A: Ins 1994 No 84, Sch 1 (14).
LARCENY
Declaratory
116 All larcenies to be of same nature
Every larceny, whatever the value of the property stolen, shall be deemed to be of the same nature, and shall be subject to the same incidents in all respects, as grand larceny was before the passing of the Act seventh and eighth George the Fourth, chapter twenty-nine.
General provisions
117 Punishment for larceny
Whosoever commits larceny, or any felony by this Act made punishable like larceny, shall, except in the cases hereinafter otherwise provided for, be liable to penal servitude for five years.s 117, subhdg: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (g).s 117: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (h).
118 Intent to return property no defence
Where, on the trial of a person for larceny, it appears that the accused appropriated the property in question to the accused’s own use, or for the accused’s own benefit, or that of another, but intended eventually to restore the same, or in the case of money to return an equivalent amount, such person shall not by reason only thereof be entitled to acquittal.
119 Verdict where several takings proved
Where, on the trial of a person for larceny, it appears that the property alleged in any count to have been stolen at one time, was taken at different times, the prosecutor shall not be required to elect upon which taking the prosecutor will proceed, unless the Judge so orders:Provided always that evidence shall not in any such case be given of any taking which occurred more than six months in point of time from any other of such takings.s 119: Am 1929 No 2, sec 5.
120 Trial for larceny—verdict of embezzlement etc
Where, on the trial of a person for larceny, it appears that the person took the property in such manner as to amount in law to the offence of embezzlement or fraudulent misappropriation, or the fraudulent application, or disposition, of property as a clerk, or servant, or person employed in the Public Service, or of obtaining property by any false pretence or by any wilfully false promise, or partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise, the jury may acquit the person of the larceny charged, and find the person guilty of such other offence, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 120: Am 1929 No 2, sec 6; 1974 No 50, sec 6 (i).
121 Verdict of “larceny or receiving”
Where, on the trial of a person charged with larceny, or any offence which includes larceny, and, also, with having feloniously received the property charged to have been stolen, knowing it to have been stolen, the jury find specially that the person either stole, or feloniously received, such property, and that they are unable to say which of those offences was committed by the person, such person shall not by reason thereof be entitled to acquittal, but shall be liable to be sentenced for the larceny, or for the felonious receiving, whichever of the two offences is subject to the lesser punishment.
122 Verdict where persons indicted for joint larceny or receiving
On the trial of any two, or more, persons charged with larceny, and also with having feloniously received property, the jury may find all, or any, of such persons guilty, either of stealing, or feloniously receiving, the property, or part or parts thereof, or may find one, or more, of the said persons guilty of stealing, and the other, or others, of them guilty of feloniously receiving the property, or part or parts thereof.
123 Verdict of misdemeanour
Where, on the trial of a person for larceny, it appears that the property in question was taken, appropriated, or retained, under circumstances amounting to a misdemeanour, the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of such misdemeanour, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.
124 Fraudulent appropriation
Where, upon the trial of a person for larceny, it appears:(a) that the person had fraudulently appropriated to his or her own use or that of another, the property in respect of which the person is indicted, although the person had not originally taken the property with any fraudulent intent, orthe jury may return a verdict accordingly, and thereupon the person shall be liable to imprisonment for two years, or to a fine of 20 penalty units, or both.(b) that the person had fraudulently retained the property in order to secure a reward for its restoration,s 124: Subst 1924 No 10, sec 9. Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (j); 1992 No 112, Sch 1.
Larceny by bailees
125 Larceny by bailee
Whosoever, being a bailee of any property, fraudulently takes, or converts, the same, or any part thereof, or any property into or for which it has been converted, or exchanged, to his or her own use, or the use of any person other than the owner thereof, although he or she does not break bulk, or otherwise determine the bailment, shall be deemed to be guilty of larceny and liable to be indicted for that offence.The accused shall be taken to be a bailee within the meaning of this section, although he or she may not have contracted to restore, or deliver, the specific property received by him or her, or may only have contracted to restore, or deliver, the property specifically.s 125: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (k); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (4).
Of animals
126 Stealing cattle or killing with intent to steal
Whosoever:steals any cattle, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.wilfully kills any cattle with intent to steal the carcass, or skin, or other part, of the cattle so killed,s 126: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (l).
127 Stealing or killing cattle—uncertainty as to sex or age not to entitle to acquittal
Where, on the trial of a person for an offence under section 126 it appears that the person stole, or killed, an animal of the species described in the indictment, but it is uncertain on the evidence what was its sex, or age, such person shall not be entitled to acquittal by reason only of such uncertainty.s 127: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
128 Trial for stealing cattle—verdict of stealing skins
Where, on the trial of a person for stealing cattle, the jury are not satisfied that the person is guilty thereof, but are satisfied that the person is guilty of stealing the carcass, or skin, or part, of such cattle, or of killing the said cattle within section 126, they may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of such last-mentioned stealing, or killing, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.
129 Trial for killing cattle—verdict of stealing
Where, on the trial of a person for the offence of killing cattle within the meaning of section 126, the jury are not satisfied that the person is guilty thereof, but are satisfied that the person is guilty of stealing such cattle, they may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of such stealing, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.
130 Trial for stealing cattle—verdict of misdemeanour
Where, on the trial of a person for stealing cattle, the jury are not satisfied that the person is guilty thereof, but are satisfied that the person is guilty of an offence within section 131, they may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of an offence under the said last mentioned section, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 130: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
131 Unlawfully using etc another person’s cattle
Whosoever:takes and works, or otherwise uses, or takes for the purpose of working, or using, any cattle the property of another person without the consent of the owner, or person in lawful possession thereof, ortakes any such cattle for the purpose of secreting the same, or obtaining a reward for the restoration or pretended finding thereof, or for any other fraudulent purpose, orshall be liable to imprisonment for three years.fraudulently brands, or ear-marks, or defaces, or alters, the brands or ear-marks of any cattle the property of another person,
132 Stealing dogs
Whosoever, having been summarily convicted under this or any former Act, of any such offence as is hereinafter in this section mentioned, afterwards,steals any dog, orshall be liable to imprisonment for one year.has unlawfully in his or her possession any stolen dog, or the skin of any stolen dog, knowing such dog to have been stolen,
133 Taking money to restore dogs
Whosoever corruptly takes any money or reward, directly or indirectly, under pretence, or upon account, of aiding any person to recover any dog which has been stolen, or which is in the possession of any person other than its owner, shall be liable to imprisonment for one year.
Of written instruments
134 Stealing, destroying etc valuable security
Whosoever steals, embezzles, or for any fraudulent purpose destroys, cancels, obliterates, or conceals, the whole or any part of any valuable security, shall be liable, as if he or she had stolen a chattel, to be punished as for larceny.s 134: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (m).
135 Stealing, destroying etc wills or codicils
Whosoever steals, or, for any fraudulent purpose destroys, cancels, obliterates, or conceals, the whole or any part of any will, codicil, or other testamentary instrument, either during the life of the testator, or after the testator’s death, or whether the same relates to real, or personal estate, or to both, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.
136 Proviso to sections 134 and 135
No person shall be convicted under section 134 or section 135 in respect of any act done by the person, if, before being charged with the offence, the person first disclosed such act on oath, under compulsory process, in a proceeding instituted in good faith by a party aggrieved, or under compulsory examination in some matter in bankruptcy, or insolvency, or under compulsory examination in some matter in the liquidation of a corporation.s 136: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1974 No 50, sec 6 (n).
137 Civil remedies not affected by conviction
(1) Nothing in section 134 or in section 135, nor any proceeding, conviction, or judgment thereupon, shall affect any remedy at law, or in equity, which any party aggrieved would have had if this Act had not been passed.(2) No evidence of the conviction of any person under either of the said sections shall be admissible in any action, or suit, against the person.s 137: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
138 Stealing, destroying etc records etc of any court or public office
Whosoever steals, or for any fraudulent purpose, takes from its place of deposit, for the time being, or from any person having the lawful custody thereof, or unlawfully and maliciously cancels, obliterates, injures, or destroys, the whole or any part, of any record, document, or writing, of, or belonging to, any Court, or relating to any matter or cause, civil or criminal, pending, or terminated, in any Court, or relating to the business of any office or employment under Her Majesty, and being in any public office, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.
Of things attached to or growing on land
139 Stealing etc metal, glass, wood etc fixed to house or land
Whosoever steals, or rips, cuts, severs, or breaks with intent to steal, any glass, or woodwork, belonging to any building, or any metal, or any utensil, or fixture, whether made of metal or other material, or of both respectively, fixed in, or to, any building, or anything made of metal, fixed in any land being private property, or used as a fence to any dwelling-house, garden, or area, or being in any square, or street, or in, or on, any place dedicated to public use or ornament, or in any burial-ground, shall be liable to be punished as for larceny.s 139: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (o); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (3).
140 Stealing etc trees etc in pleasure-grounds etc
Whosoever:steals, or destroys or damages with intent to steal, the whole, or any part, of any tree, sapling, shrub, or plant, or any underwood, growing in any park, pleasure-ground, garden, orchard, or avenue, or in any ground belonging to any dwelling-house, where the value of the article stolen, or the amount of injury done, exceeds two dollars, orshall be liable to be punished as for larceny.steals, or destroys or damages with intent to steal, the whole, or any part, of any tree, sapling, shrub, or plant, or any underwood respectively growing elsewhere than in any situation beforementioned, where the value of the article stolen, or the amount of injury done, exceeds ten dollars,s 140: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (p).
141–147 (Repealed)
ss 141–143: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (i).
s 144, hdg: Rep 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [2].
s 144: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (q). Rep 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [2].
s 145: Rep 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [2].
s 146: Rep 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [2].
s 147: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (r). Rep 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [2].
In dwelling-house
148 Stealing property in a dwelling-house
Whosoever steals in a dwelling-house any property shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.s 148: Am 1985 No 9, Sch 1 (1).
149 The same with menaces
Whosoever steals any property in a dwelling-house, and uses thereafter any menace or threat to any person therein, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
Of goods in process of manufacture, tools, &c
150 Stealing goods in process of manufacture
Whosoever steals, to the value of one dollar, any goods, article, or material, while anywhere placed, or exposed, during the process or progress of manufacture, shall be liable to penal servitude for a term not exceeding three years.
151 Selling etc materials to be manufactured
Whosoever, being, for the purpose of manufacture, or any special purpose connected with manufacture, employed to make, prepare, or work up, any goods, article, or material, or being for any such purpose entrusted with any such goods, article, or material, or with any tools, or apparatus, sells, pawns, purloins, secretes, embezzles, exchanges, or otherwise fraudulently disposes of the same, or any part thereof, shall be liable to imprisonment for four years.
From ships or wharfs
152 Stealing from ship in port or on wharfs etc
Whosoever:steals any property in any vessel, barge, or boat, while in any haven, or port, or upon any navigable river, or canal, or in any creek, or basin, belonging to, or communicating with, any such haven, port, river, or canal, orshall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.steals any property from any dock, wharf, or quay,
153 Stealing from ship in distress or wrecked
Whosoever steals, or plunders, any part of any vessel in distress, or wrecked, stranded, or cast on shore, or any property of any kind to the value of two dollars belonging to such vessel, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.s 153: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (s).
By tenants or lodgers
154 Tenants etc stealing articles let to hire
Whosoever, being the tenant, or occupier, of any house, building, or lodging, steals any chattel, or fixture let to be used therewith, whether the contract was entered into by the accused, or by any person on his or her behalf, shall be liable to be punished as for larceny.s 154: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (t).
Of vehicles or boats
154A Taking a conveyance without consent of owner
s 154A, hdg: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 9.(1) Any person who:(a) without having the consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of a conveyance, takes and drives it, or takes it for the purpose of driving it, or secreting it, or obtaining a reward for its restoration or pretended restoration, or for any other fraudulent purpose, orshall be deemed to be guilty of larceny and liable to be indicted for that offence.(b) knowing that any conveyance has been taken without such consent, drives it or allows himself or herself to be carried in or on it,(2) For the purposes of this section conveyance means any cart, wagon, cab, carriage, motor car, caravan, trailer, motor lorry, tractor, earth moving equipment, omnibus, motor or other bicycle, or any ship, or vessel, whether decked or undecked, used or intended for navigation, and drive shall be construed accordingly.s 154A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 9. Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (j), Sch; 1955 No 16, sec 6 (b); 1967 No 77, sec 2 (d). Subst 1974 No 50, sec 6 (u). Am 1980 No 53, Sch 1 (3).
154AA Car stealing etc
(1) Any person who steals a motor car is liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(2) In this section:motor car means a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909, but does not include a caravan, trailer or motor vehicle constructed principally for use in agricultural production.s 154AA: Ins 1988 No 81, Sch 3 (2). Am 1997 No 115, Sch 4.4 [3].
Larceny and illegal use of aircraft
154B Stealing aircraft and unlawfully taking or exercising control of aircraft
s 154B, hdg: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 2 (e).(1) Whosoever steals any aircraft shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.(2) Whosoever without lawful excuse takes or exercises control, whether direct or through another person, of an aircraft shall be deemed to be guilty of larceny and be liable to penal servitude for seven years.(3) Whosoever without lawful excuse takes or exercises control, whether direct or through another person, of an aircraft while another person, not being an accomplice of the first-mentioned person, is on board the aircraft shall be deemed to be guilty of larceny and be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.(4) Whosoever without lawful excuse, by force or violence or threat of force or violence, or by any trick or false pretence, takes or exercises control, whether direct or through another person, of an aircraft while another person, not being an accomplice of the first-mentioned person, is on board the aircraft shall be deemed to be guilty of larceny and be liable to penal servitude for twenty years.s 154B: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 9. Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1955 No 16, sec 6 (c). Ins 1967 No 77, sec 2 (e).
154C (Repealed)
s 154C, hdg: Ins 1929 No 26, sec 2. Rep 1991 No 63, Sch 2.
s 154C: Ins 1929 No 26, sec 2. Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (v). Rep 1991 No 63, Sch 2.
EMBEZZLEMENT OR LARCENY
By clerks and servants
155 Definition of clerk or servant
Every person employed for any purpose, as, or in the capacity of, a clerk, or servant, or as a collector of moneys, although temporarily only, or employed also by other persons, or employed to pay as well as receive moneys, or although the person had no authority from his or her employer to receive money, or other property, on his or her account, shall be deemed a clerk, or servant.s 155: Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (k).
156 Larceny by clerks or servants
Whosoever, being a clerk, or servant, steals any property belonging to, or in the possession, or power of, his or her master, or employer, or any property into or for which it has been converted, or exchanged, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
157 Embezzlement by clerks or servants
Whosoever, being a clerk, or servant, fraudulently embezzles, either the whole or any part of, any property delivered to, or received, or taken into possession by him or her, for, or in the name, or on the account of, his or her master, or employer, shall be deemed to have stolen the same, although such property was not received into the possession of such master, or employer, otherwise than by the actual possession of such clerk, or servant, and shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
158 Destruction, falsification of accounts etc by clerk or servant
Whosoever, being a clerk, or servant, or person acting in the capacity of a clerk, or servant,destroys, alters, mutilates, or falsifies, any book, paper, writing, valuable security, or account, belonging to, or in the possession of, or received for his or her employer, orwith intent in any such case to defraud,makes, or concurs in making, any false entry in, or omits, or alters, or concurs in omitting or altering, any material particular from, or in, any such book, or writing, or account,
shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
By persons employed in the Public Service
159 Larceny by persons in Public Service
Whosoever, being employed in the Public Service, steals any property, or any part thereof, intrusted to him or her, or taken into his or her possession, or being in his or her custody, or under his or her control, by virtue or colour of such employment, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
160 Embezzlement etc by persons in the Public Service
Whosoever, being employed in the Public Service, fraudulently embezzles any property, or any part thereof, so intrusted to him or her, or taken into his or her possession, or being in his or her custody, or under his or her control, or fraudulently secretes, removes, or in any manner fraudulently applies, or disposes of, the same, or any part thereof, shall be deemed to have stolen the same, and shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
General deficiency
161 Proof of general deficiency in accounts
On the prosecution of a person for larceny, or embezzlement as a clerk, or servant, or as a person employed in the Public Service, where the charge is in respect of money, it shall not be necessary to prove the larceny, or embezzlement, by the accused of any specific sum of money, if there is proof of a general deficiency on the examination of the books of account, or entries kept, or made by him or her, or otherwise, and the jury are satisfied that he or she stole, or fraudulently embezzled the deficient money, or any part thereof.
By joint owners
162 Larceny etc by joint owners
Whosoever, being a member of any copartnership, or being one of two, or more, joint owners, steals, or embezzles, any property of, or belonging to, such copartnership, or joint owners, may be convicted of, and punished for, the offence as if he or she was not a member of the copartnership, or one of such joint owners.Copartnership shall, for the purposes of this section, include all corporations and societies whatsoever.
Alternative verdict
163 Trial for embezzlement—verdict of larceny
Where, on the trial of any person for embezzlement, or the fraudulent application, or disposition, of property as a clerk, or servant, or person employed in the Public Service, it appears that the person obtained the property in such manner as to amount in law to larceny, the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of larceny, or of larceny as such clerk, servant, or person, as the case may be, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 163: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (w).
FRAUDS BY FACTORS AND OTHER AGENTS
164 Terms “agents”, “intrusted” and “misappropriate”
For the purposes of sections 165 to 171 both inclusive:intrusted means intrusted, either solely, or jointly, with any other person.agent includes bankers, merchants, attorneys, factors, brokers, and every other person acting in the capacity of an agent so intrusted.misappropriate means appropriate in any manner whether by sale, pledge, or otherwise, to the agent’s own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of some one other than the person, by, or for whom, he or she was so intrusted.s 164: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
165 Agent misappropriating money etc intrusted to him or her
Whosoever having been intrusted as an agent with any money, or security for the payment of money, with a direction in writing to apply, pay, or deliver, such money or security, or any part thereof, respectively, or the proceeds, or any part of the proceeds, of such security for any purpose, or to any person specified in such direction, misappropriates in any manner such money, security, or proceeds, or any part thereof, respectively, in violation of good faith, and contrary to the terms of such direction, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
166 The like as to goods etc intrusted to him or her
Whosoever having been intrusted as an agent with any chattel, or valuable security, for safe custody, or for any special purpose, without authority to sell, negotiate, transfer, or pledge the same, or with any power of attorney for the sale, or transfer, of any share, or interest, in any public stock, or fund, or in any stock, or fund of any body corporate, or company, misappropriates in any manner such chattel, or security, or the proceeds of the same, or any part thereof, or the share, or interest, in the stock or fund, to which such power of attorney relates, or any part thereof, in violation of good faith, and contrary to the purpose for which such chattel, security, or power of attorney, was intrusted to him or her shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
167 Not to affect trustees or mortgagees nor to restrain agents from receiving money on valuable securities etc
Nothing in section 165 or section 166 shall affect any trustee under any instrument, or any mortgagee of property, in respect of any act done by such trustee, or mortgagee, in relation to the property comprised in, or affected by, the trust, or mortgage, or shall restrain an agent from receiving money payable upon any valuable security according to the tenor and effect thereof, or from disposing of property on which he or she has any claim entitling him or her by law so to do, unless such disposal extends to more than is requisite for satisfying such claim.s 167: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
168 Fraudulent sale of property by agent
Whosoever, being an agent intrusted with property for safe custody, fraudulently sells, negotiates, transfers, pledges, or in any manner misappropriates, the same, or any part thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanour.
169 The same by person under power of attorney
Whosoever, being intrusted with any power of attorney for the sale, or transfer, of property, fraudulently sells, transfers, or otherwise misappropriates the same, or any part thereof, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.
170 Agent obtaining advances on property of his or her principal
Whosoever, being an agent intrusted with property for the purpose of sale, or otherwise disposing of the same,otherwise than for the use of his or her principal, and in violation of good faith, transfers, consigns, pledges, or delivers the same, or any part thereof, as security for money, or other valuable thing, borrowed, or received, or to be borrowed, or received, by such agent, or,otherwise than for the use of his or her principal, and in violation of good faith, obtains any advance of money, or other valuable thing, upon any undertaking by him or her to transfer, consign, pledge, or deliver such property, or any part thereof, orshall be liable to penal servitude for ten years:assists in the making of any such transfer, consignment, pledge, or delivery, or in the obtaining of any such advance, knowing the same in any such case to be in violation of good faith,Provided that nothing in this section shall extend to any transfer, consignment, pledge, or delivery, made, or agreed to be made, as security for no greater sum than the amount, if any, then due to such agent, and of any current bill, or bills, drawn by, or on account of, his or her principal and accepted by such agent.
171 What to be deemed intrusting with goods etc
For the purposes of section 170:(1) every agent intrusted with the possession of a document of title to property, whether derived immediately from the owner of the property, or obtained by such agent by reason of his or her having possession of such property, or of some other document of title thereto, shall be deemed to have been intrusted with the property indicated by such document,(2) every transfer, pledge, or delivery, of any such document shall be deemed a transfer, pledge, or delivery, of the property indicated by the same,(3) where any such document, or the property thereby indicated, is held by any person on the behalf, or subject to the control, of any such agent, the same shall be taken to be in the possession of such agent,(4) every agent in possession of property, or of any such document of title, shall be taken to have been intrusted therewith by the owner, unless the contrary is shown.s 171: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
172 Trustees fraudulently disposing of property
Whosoever, being a trustee of property for the use or benefit, wholly or partially, of some other person or for any public or charitable purpose,converts, or appropriates, the same, or any part thereof, for the use or benefit of himself or herself, or some other person, or for any other than such public or charitable purpose, or,in violation in any such case of good faith, and with intent to defraud, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years:otherwise disposes of, or destroys such property, or any part thereof,Provided that no prosecution shall be instituted under this section without the leave of the Supreme Court or of the Attorney-General.s 172: Am 1970 No 52, Second Sch (am 1972 No 41, Second Sch).
173 Directors etc fraudulently appropriating etc property
Whosoever, being a director, officer, or member, of any body corporate, or public company,fraudulently takes, or applies, for his or her own use or benefit, or any use or purpose other than the use or purpose of such body corporate, or company, orshall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.fraudulently destroys any of the property of such body corporate, or company,s 173: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (x); 1979 No 95, Sch 2.
174 Directors etc omitting certain entries
Whosoever, being a director, or officer of any body corporate, or public company, receives, or possesses himself or herself, of any of the property of such body corporate, or company, otherwise than in payment of a just debt, and, with intent to defraud, omits to make, or direct to be made, a true and sufficient entry thereof in the books, or accounts, of such body corporate, or company, shall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.s 174: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (y); 1979 No 95, Sch 2.
175 Director etc wilfully destroying etc books of company etc
Whosoever, being a director, officer, or member, of any body corporate, or public company,destroys, alters, mutilates, or falsifies, any book, entry, paper-writing, or valuable security, belonging to such body corporate, or company, orwith intent in any such case to defraud,makes, or concurs in making, any false entry, or omits, or concurs in omitting, any material particular in any book of account, or other document,
shall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.s 175: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (z); 1979 No 95, Sch 2.
176 Director or officer publishing fraudulent statements
Whosoever, being a director, or officer, of any body corporate, or public company, makes, circulates, or publishes, or concurs in making, circulating, or publishing, any written statement, or account, which he or she knows to be false in any material particular, with intent to deceive, or defraud, any member, shareholder, or creditor, of such body corporate, or company, or with intent to induce any person to become a shareholder, or partner therein, or to intrust, or advance, any property to such body corporate, or company, or to enter into any security for the benefit thereof, shall be liable to penal servitude for 10 years.s 176: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (aa); 1979 No 95, Sch 2.
176A Directors etc cheating or defrauding
Whosoever, being a director, officer, or member, of any body corporate or public company, cheats or defrauds, or does or omits to do any act with intent to cheat or defraud, the body corporate or company or any person in his or her dealings with the body corporate or company shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years.s 176A: Ins 1979 No 95, Sch 1 (3).
177 Proviso to sections 165 to 176 inclusive
No person shall be convicted of any offence under any of the sections from section 165 to section 176 both inclusive in respect of any act or omission by the person, if, before being charged with the offence, the person first disclosed such act or omission, on oath, under compulsory process, in a proceeding instituted by a party aggrieved, or under compulsory examination in some matter in bankruptcy, or insolvency, or under compulsory examination in some matter in the liquidation of a corporation.s 177: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1974 No 50, sec 6 (bb).
178 No relief from compulsory disclosures
(1) Nothing in sections 165 to 176 both inclusive shall relieve any person from making a full discovery, by answer to interrogatories, or from answering any question in a civil proceeding.(2) No evidence of the conviction of any person, under any of the said sections, shall be admissible in any suit against the person.(3) Nothing in the said sections, nor any proceeding or conviction under them, shall affect any remedy which any party would have had if this Act had not been passed, nor shall affect any agreement entered into, or security given, by a trustee, having for its object the restoration, or repayment, of any trust property misappropriated.s 178: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1970 No 52, Second Sch.
FRAUDULENT MISAPPROPRIATION
178A Fraudulent misappropriation of moneys collected or received
Whosoever having collected or received any money or valuable security upon terms requiring him or her to deliver or account for or pay to any person the whole or any part of:s 178A, subhdg: Ins 1929 No 2, sec 7.(a) such money or valuable security or the proceeds thereof, orfraudulently misappropriates to his or her own use or the use of any other person, or fraudulently omits to account for or pay the whole or any part of such money, valuable security, or proceeds, or the whole or any part of such balance in violation of the terms on which he or she collected or received such money or valuable security, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.(b) any balance of such money, valuable security, or proceeds thereof after any authorised deductions or payments have been made thereout,For the purposes of this section any such money, valuable security, or proceeds thereof, or any balance thereout shall be deemed to be the property of the person who authorised the collection or receipt of the money or valuable security or from whom the money or valuable security was received notwithstanding that the accused may have been authorised to make any deduction thereout on his or her own behalf, or any payment thereout to another person, or to mix such money, valuable security, or proceeds thereof, or such balance with his or her own moneys.s 178A: Ins 1929 No 2, sec 7. Am 1929 No 30, sec 2.
VALUELESS CHEQUES
178B Valueless cheques
Whosoever obtains any chattel, money or valuable security by passing any cheque which is not paid on presentation shall, unless he or she proves:(a) that he or she had reasonable grounds for believing that that cheque would be paid in full on presentation, andbe liable to imprisonment for one year, notwithstanding that there may have been some funds to the credit of the account on which the cheque was drawn at the time it was passed.(b) that he or she had no intent to defraud,s 178B and subhdg: Ins 1951 No 31, sec 2 (l) (i).
OBTAINING MONEY, ETC, BY DECEPTION
178BA Obtaining money etc by deception
s 178BA, hdg: Ins 1979 No 95, Sch 1 (4).(1) Whosoever by any deception dishonestly obtains for himself or herself or another person any money or valuable thing or any financial advantage of any kind whatsoever shall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(2) In subsection (1):deception means deception (whether deliberate or reckless) by words or conduct as to fact or as to law, including:(a) a deception as to the present intentions of the person using the deception or of any other person, and(b) an act or thing done or omitted to be done with the intention of causing:(i) a computer system, orto make a response that the person doing or omitting to do the act or thing is not authorised to cause the computer system or machine to make.(ii) a machine that is designed to operate by means of payment or identification,s 178BA: Ins 1979 No 95, Sch 1 (4). Am 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (2).
OBTAINING MONEY, ETC, BY FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENTS
178BB Obtaining money etc by false or misleading statements
Whosoever, with intent to obtain for himself or herself or another person any money or valuable thing or any financial advantage of any kind whatsoever, makes or publishes, or concurs in making or publishing, any statement (whether or not in writing) which he or she knows to be false or misleading in a material particular or which is false or misleading in a material particular and is made with reckless disregard as to whether it is true or is false or misleading in a material particular shall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years.s 178BB and hdg: Ins 1979 No 95, Sch 1 (4).
OBTAINING CREDIT BY FRAUD
178C Obtaining credit by fraud
Whosoever incurring any debt or liability obtains credit by any false pretence or by any wilfully false promise or partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise or by any other fraud shall be liable to imprisonment for one year.s 178C and hdg: Ins 1961 No 70, sec 2 (b).
FALSE PRETENCES
179 False pretences etc
Whosoever, by any false pretence or by any wilfully false promise, or partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise, obtains from any person any property, with intent to defraud, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.s 179: Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (m).
180 Causing payment etc by false pretence etc
Where the accused, by any false pretence or by any wilfully false promise, or partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise, causes, or procures, any money to be paid, or any property to be delivered, to himself or herself, or any other person for the use or benefit, or on account of himself or herself, or any other person, with intent to defraud, the accused shall be deemed to have obtained the same within the meaning of section 179.s 180: Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (n), Sch.
181 False pretence of title
Where the accused falsely, and with intent to defraud, represents that the accused has a title, or right, to certain property, or to convey, or dispose of, certain property, knowing such representation to be false, and thereby obtains any property, the accused shall be deemed to have obtained the same within the meaning of section 179.
182 Accused may be convicted on a charge of false pretences etc though property obtained partly by a false promise
Where, on the trial of a person for obtaining property by any false pretence or by any wilfully false promise, it appears that the property was obtained partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise, such person shall not by reason thereof be entitled to acquittal.s 182: Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (o).
183 Trial for false pretences etc—verdict of larceny
Where, on the trial of a person for obtaining property by any false pretence or by any wilfully false promise, or partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise, it appears that the person obtained the property in such manner as to amount in law to larceny or fraudulent misappropriation, the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of larceny, or of larceny as a clerk, or servant, or a person employed in the Public Service, or of fraudulent misappropriation, as the case may be, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.s 183: Am 1929 No 2, sec 8; 1951 No 31, sec 2 (p); 1974 No 50, sec 6 (cc).
184 Fraudulent personation
Whosoever falsely personates, or pretends to be, some other person, with intent fraudulently to obtain any property, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.Nothing in this section shall prevent any person so personating, or pretending, from being proceeded against in respect of such act, or pretence, under any other enactment or at Common Law.s 184: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (dd).
184A Personating owner of stock or property
A person who falsely and deceitfully personates:(a) any owner of any share or interest of or in any stock, annuities or other public funds or of or in the capital stock of any body corporate, or(b) any owner of any dividend or money payable in respect of a share or interest referred to in paragraph (a), orand transfers, or endeavours to transfer, any share, estate or interest belonging to the owner or receives, or endeavours to receive, any money due to the owner as if the person were the true owner is liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(c) any owner of any property, or any estate or interest in or charge or encumbrance on property,s 184A: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (3).
185 Inducing persons by fraud to execute instruments
Whosoever, with intent to defraud or injure any person, causes, or induces, any person, by any false pretence, to execute, make, accept, indorse, or destroy, the whole, or any part, of any valuable security, or to write, impress, or affix, any name, or seal, upon any paper, or parchment, in order that the same may be afterwards made or converted into, or used or dealt with as a valuable security, shall be liable to penal servitude for seven years.s 185: Am 1951 No 31, sec 6 (a).
Fraudulent arrangements
185A Inducing persons to enter into certain arrangements by misleading etc statements etc
s 185A, hdg: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 6 (a).(1) Whosoever, by any statement, promise or forecast which he or she knows to be misleading, false or deceptive, or by any dishonest concealment of material facts, or by the reckless making (dishonestly or otherwise) of any statement, promise or forecast which is misleading, false or deceptive, induces or attempts to induce another person to take part or offer to take part in any arrangement with respect to property other than marketable securities, being arrangements the purpose or effect, or pretended purpose or effect, of which is to enable persons taking part in arrangements (whether by becoming owners of the property or any part of the property or otherwise) to participate in or receive profits or income alleged to arise or to be likely to arise from the acquisition, holding, management or disposal of such property, or sums to be paid or alleged to be likely to be paid out of such profits or income, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.(2) Any person guilty of conspiracy to commit an offence under subsection (1) shall be punishable as if he or she had committed such an offence.(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1) a statement, promise or forecast shall, for the purposes of that subsection, be deemed to be misleading or deceptive if it is of such a nature that it would reasonably tend to lead to a belief in the existence of a state of affairs that does not in fact exist, whether or not the statement, promise or forecast indicates that that state of affairs does exist.(4) Where a body corporate is convicted of an offence under subsection (1) any director of the body corporate, or any manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body corporate, or any person who was purporting to act in any such capacity shall, if he or she consented to or connived at the commission of that offence, be guilty of that offence and be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.(5) Without limiting the generality of subsection (4), a person shall, for the purposes of that subsection, be deemed to be a director of a body corporate if he or she occupies in relation thereto the position of a director, by whatever name called, or is a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the company or any of them act:Provided that a person shall not, by reason only that the directors of a body corporate act on advice given by the person in a professional capacity, be taken, for the purposes of this subsection, to be a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions those directors act.(6) In this section marketable securities has the meaning ascribed to that expression in the Companies (New South Wales) Code.s 185A: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 6 (a). Am 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (4); 1981 No 123, Sch 8.
CORRUPT REWARDS
186 Taking reward for helping to recover stolen property
Whosoever corruptly takes, or offers, or agrees, to take, any money, or reward, directly or indirectly, under pretence, or upon account, of helping any person to recover any property, taken, or obtained, or converted, or disposed of, in such manner as to be punishable by this Act, shall, unless he or she has used all due diligence to cause the offender to be brought to trial for the same, be liable to penal servitude for five years.s 186: Am 1937 No 35, Second Sch.
RECEIVERS
187 Term “stealing” in sections 188 and 189
For the purposes of sections 188 and 189:Stealing includes the taking, extorting, obtaining, embezzling, or otherwise disposing of the property in question.s 187: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
188 Receiving etc where principal guilty of felony
Whosoever receives, or disposes of, or attempts to dispose of, any property, the stealing whereof amounts to felony, knowing the same to have been stolen, shall be guilty of felony, and may be indicted, either as an accessory after the fact, or for a substantive felony, and in the latter case whether the principal felon has been previously tried or not, or is amenable to justice or not, and in either case shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.s 188: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (ee).
189 Receiving etc where principal guilty of misdemeanour
Whosoever receives, or disposes of, or attempts to dispose of, any property, the stealing whereof is a misdemeanour, knowing the same to have been stolen, shall be guilty of a misdemeanour, and whether the person guilty of the principal offence has been previously tried or not, or is amenable to justice or not, shall be liable to imprisonment for three years.s 189: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (ff).
189A Receiving etc goods stolen out of New South Wales
(1) Whosoever, without lawful excuse, receives or disposes of, or attempts to dispose of, or has in his or her possession, any property stolen outside the State of New South Wales, knowing the same to have been stolen, and whether or not he or she took part in the stealing of the property, shall be liable to penal servitude for ten years.(2) For the purposes of this section property shall be deemed to have been stolen if it has been taken, extorted, obtained, embezzled, converted, or disposed of under such circumstances that if the act had been committed in the State of New South Wales the person committing it would have been guilty of an indictable offence according to the law for the time being of the State of New South Wales.(3) No person shall be liable to conviction under this section if the taking, extorting, obtaining, embezzling, converting, or disposing is not a criminal offence in the country in which the act is committed.s 189A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 9 (d). Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (gg).
189B Prosecution under section 188 or 189 where property stolen in course of transmission
(1) Where in the trial of a person for the offence under section 188 or 189 of receiving, or disposing of, or attempting to dispose of, any property knowing it to have been stolen, it is proved that the property was stolen in the course of transmission between New South Wales and any other jurisdiction or between any other jurisdiction and New South Wales:(a) the person shall be liable to be convicted of the offence without proof that the stealing took place in New South Wales, and(b) for the purpose of determining whether or not the stealing amounts to a felony or a misdemeanour, the stealing shall be deemed to have taken place in New South Wales.(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) other jurisdiction means a State (other than New South Wales) or Territory of the Commonwealth.s 189B: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 6 (hh).
190 Receiving etc cattle feloniously killed, or carcass etc
Whosoever:receives any animal, feloniously killed, with intent to steal the carcass, or skin, or other part thereof, knowing the same to have been so killed, orshall be guilty of felony, and may be indicted and punished as if the animal had been stolen, and the accused had feloniously received the same.receives, or disposes of, or attempts to dispose of, any part of an animal so killed, or of an animal feloniously stolen, knowing it to have been so killed or so stolen,s 190: Am 1974 No 50, sec 6 (ii).
191 Uncertainty as to sex or age not to entitle to acquittal
Where, on the trial of a person for an offence under section 190, it appears that the animal was of the species mentioned in the indictment, but it is uncertain on the evidence what was its sex or age, such person shall not be entitled to acquittal by reason only of such uncertainty.s 191: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
192 Receiving material or tools intrusted for manufacture
Whosoever receives any goods, article, or material or any tools, or apparatus for manufacturing, or working up, the same, knowing the same to have been purloined, embezzled, or secreted, within the meaning of section 151, or that the person offering the same is fraudulently disposing thereof, shall be liable to imprisonment for four years.
193 Verdict where several persons are indicted for jointly receiving
Where, on the trial of two or more persons for jointly receiving property, it appears that one, or more, separately received such property, or any part thereof, the jury may convict such one or more of the said persons as is, or are, proved to have so received the same.
Chapter 2 Criminal destruction and damage
pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.
pt 4, ch 2: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
Division 1 Interpretation
194 Interpretation
(1) In this Chapter, a reference to property does not include a reference to property that is not of a tangible nature.(2) In this Chapter, a reference to property includes a reference to wild creatures that have been tamed or are ordinarily kept in captivity and also includes any other wild creatures or their carcasses but only if they:(a) have been reduced into possession that has not been lost or abandoned, or(b) are in the course of being reduced into possession.(3) For the purposes of this Chapter, an act done by a person under a reasonable belief that the person had a right to do the act shall be taken not to have been done maliciously.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 194–197: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
Division 2 Crimes against property generally
195 Maliciously destroying or damaging property
A person who maliciously destroys or damages property belonging to another or to that person and another is liable:(a) to penal servitude for 5 years, or(b) if the destruction or damage is caused by means of fire or explosives, to penal servitude for 10 years.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 194–197: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
196 Maliciously destroying or damaging property with intent to injure a person
A person who maliciously destroys or damages property, intending by the destruction or damage to cause bodily injury to another, is liable:(a) to penal servitude for 7 years, or(b) if the destruction or damage is caused by means of fire or explosives, to penal servitude for 14 years.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 194–197: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
197 Dishonestly destroying or damaging property
A person who dishonestly, with a view to making a gain for that person or another, destroys or damages property is liable:(a) to penal servitude for 7 years, or(b) if the destruction or damage is caused by means of fire or explosives, to penal servitude for 14 years.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 194–197: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
198 Maliciously destroying or damaging property with the intention of endangering life
A person who maliciously destroys or damages property, intending by the destruction or damage to endanger the life of another, is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.s 198: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (21).
199 Threatening to destroy or damage property
A person who, without lawful excuse, makes a threat to another, with the intention of causing that other to fear that the threat would be carried out:(a) to destroy or damage property belonging to that other or to a third person, oris liable to penal servitude for 5 years.(b) to destroy or damage the first-mentioned person’s own property in a way which that person knows will or is likely to endanger the life of, or to cause bodily injury to, that other or a third person,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 199–203: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
200 Possession, custody or control of an article with intent to destroy or damage property
A person who has possession, custody or control of an article with the intention that it should be used maliciously to destroy or damage property belonging to:(a) some other person, oris liable to penal servitude for 3 years.(b) the first-mentioned person or the user, or both of them, and some other person,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 199–203: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
Division 3 Crimes relating to particular kinds of property etc
201 Interfering with a mine
A person who maliciously:(a) causes water to run into a mine or any subterranean channel connected to it,(b) destroys, damages or obstructs any shaft, passage, pit, airway, waterway or drain of, or associated with, a mine,(c) destroys, damages or renders useless any equipment, building, road or bridge belonging to a mine, oris liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(d) hinders the working of equipment belonging to a mine,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 199–203: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
202 Causing damage etc to sea, river, canal and other works
A person who:(a) maliciously destroys, damages, removes or interferes with piles or other materials that form part of, or have been fixed or placed in position in order to secure:(i) a sea wall or other structure designed to prevent erosion by the sea,(ii) the bank or bed of, or a dam, weir or lock located on, a river or canal,(iii) a drain, aqueduct, marsh or reservoir, or(iv) a dock, quay, wharf, jetty or other harbour installation,(b) maliciously opens a floodgate or sluice that is located at or on a dam, weir, reservoir or watercourse, or(c) with the intention of obstructing or hindering the navigation of vessels or boats on a navigable river or canal:(i) interferes with or obstructs the flow of the river or canal,(ii) damages or interferes with the bank or bed of the river or canal, oris liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(d) destroys, damages or interferes with any structure or equipment constructed or installed in connection with the use of the river or canal for the purposes of navigation,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 199–203: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
203 False statement that a person or property is in danger
If:(a) a person:(i) makes to another person a statement that the first-mentioned person knows to be false or misleading, or(ii) sends to another person a document containing such a statement, andthe first-mentioned person is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(b) the statement is likely to make that other person fear for the safety of a person (including the maker of the statement or the person to whom it is made) or for the safety of property, or both,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 199–203: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5).
Part 4AA Offences relating to transport services
pt 4AA: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
Division 1 Offences relating to aircraft, vessels etc
204 Destruction of, or damage to, an aircraft or vessel with intent or reckless indifference
Any person who:(a) with intent to cause the death of a person, ordestroys or damages an aircraft or vessel is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(b) with reckless indifference for the safety of the life of a person,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.s 204: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6). Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (22).
205 Prejudicing the safe operation of an aircraft or vessel
A person who, whether on board the aircraft or vessel or not, does anything with the intention of prejudicing the safety of an aircraft or vessel is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 205–207: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
206 Assault etc on member of crew of aircraft or vessel
A person who, while on board an aircraft or vessel, assaults or threatens with violence a member of the crew of the aircraft or vessel:(a) so as to interfere with the functions or duties performed by the crew member in connection with the safe operation of the aircraft or vessel, oris liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(b) so as to diminish the ability of the crew member to perform those functions or duties,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 205–207: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
207 Placing etc dangerous articles on board an aircraft or vessel
(1) In this section:dangerous article means:(a) a firearm, ammunition for a firearm, a weapon or an explosive, or(b) a substance or thing that, because of its nature or condition, could endanger the safety of an aircraft or vessel or persons on board an aircraft or vessel.(2) A person who:(a) places or carries on board an aircraft or vessel an article knowing that it is a dangerous article,(b) knowing that an article is a dangerous article, delivers the article to a person for the purpose of having the article placed or carried on board an aircraft or vessel, oris liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(c) has possession of an article while on board an aircraft or vessel knowing that the article is a dangerous article,(3) Subsection (2):(a) does not apply to or in relation to anything done with an article in relation to an aircraft or vessel with the consent of the owner or operator of the aircraft or vessel where that consent is given with a knowledge of the nature or condition of the article, and(b) does not apply to or in relation to the carrying or placing of a firearm or ammunition for a firearm on board an aircraft or vessel with permission given in accordance with regulations in force under the Air Navigation Act 1920 of the Commonwealth.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 205–207: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
208 Threatening to destroy etc an aircraft, vessel or vehicle
(1) In this section:threat includes:(a) an expression of intention, or(b) the making of a statement from which an expression of intention could reasonably be inferred.transport vehicle means:(a) a mechanically or electrically driven vehicle that is used or designed to be used for the purpose of conveying passengers or goods, or passengers and goods, or for the purpose of drawing a vehicle or vehicles of the kind referred to in paragraph (b), orbut does not include an aircraft or vessel.(b) a vehicle not so driven that is directly or indirectly connected to and drawn by, or designed to be connected to and drawn by, a vehicle of the kind first referred to in paragraph (a),(2) A person who makes a demand of another person with a threat:(a) to destroy or damage, or endanger the safety of, an aircraft, vessel or transport vehicle, oris liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(b) to kill, or inflict bodily injury on, persons who are in or on an aircraft, vessel or transport vehicle,(3) A person who makes a demand of another person together with a threat to do any of the things mentioned in subsection (2) (a) or (b) and, while that threat still has effect:(a) discharges a firearm,(b) causes an explosion, oris liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(c) inflicts grievous bodily harm on, or wounds, a person,(4) A person who makes a threat:(a) to destroy or damage, or endanger the safety of, an aircraft, vessel or transport vehicle, oris liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(b) to kill, or inflict bodily injury on, persons who are in or on an aircraft, vessel or transport vehicle,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.s 208: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6). Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (23).
209 False information as to plan etc to prejudice the safety of an aircraft or vessel or persons on board an aircraft or vessel
A person who makes a statement or conveys information, knowing it to be false, to the effect, or from which it could reasonably be inferred, that there has been, is or is to be a plan, proposal, attempt, conspiracy or threat to:(a) take, or exercise control of, an aircraft or vessel by force,(b) destroy or damage, or endanger the safety of, an aircraft or vessel, oris liable to imprisonment for 2 years.(c) kill, or inflict bodily injury on, persons in or on an aircraft or vessel,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.s 209: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
210 Destroying, damaging etc an aid to navigation
A person who:(a) maliciously destroys, damages, removes, conceals or interferes with a mark, device or equipment used or designed to be used to assist the navigation of aircraft or vessels, oris liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(b) does any act with the intention of causing any such destruction, damage, concealment or interference,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.s 210: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
Division 2 Offences relating to railways etc
211 Criminal acts relating to railways
(1) A person who:(a) maliciously does any act on or in connection with the operation of a railway, orwith the intention of causing the death of, inflicting bodily injury on or endangering the safety of any person who is on the railway, or who is in or on any locomotive or other rolling stock on the railway, is liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(b) maliciously omits to do any act on or in connection with a railway that it is the person’s duty to do,(2) A person who:(a) maliciously does any act on or in connection with the operation of a railway, orwith the intention of causing any locomotive or other rolling stock on the railway to be derailed, destroyed or damaged, is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(b) maliciously omits to do any act on or in connection with the operation of a railway that it is the person’s duty to do,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.s 211: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6). Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (24).
212 Endangering passengers etc on railway
A person who, by an unlawful act or a negligent omission, endangers the safety of any person who is on, or who is being conveyed on, a railway is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 212–214: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
213 Obstructing a railway
A person who:(a) intentionally and without lawful excuse, does an act, or omits to do an act, which causes the passage or operation of a locomotive or other rolling stock on a railway to be obstructed, oris liable to imprisonment for 2 years.(b) assists a person to do or omit to do such an act, with the knowledge that the person’s intention to do or omit to do that act is without lawful excuse,pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 212–214: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
214 Obstructing a railway—verdict of misdemeanour
(1) If, on the trial of a person for an offence under section 211, the jury is not satisfied that the person is guilty of the offence, but is satisfied that the person is guilty of an offence under section 212 or 213, it may acquit the person of the offence charged and instead find the person guilty of an offence under section 212 or 213.(2) If, in accordance with subsection (1), a jury finds a person guilty of an offence under section 212 or 213, the person is liable to be punished as provided by that section.pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.ss 212–214: Ins 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (6).
215–249 (Repealed)
pt 4, ch 2 (ss 194–249): Rep 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5). For information concerning Part 4, Chapter 2 before the commencement of 1987 No 287, Sch 1 (5) see the historical table of amendments, item (1) in the Legislative history.
Part 4A Corruptly receiving commissions and other corrupt practices
pt 4A: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249A Definitions
In this Part:agent includes:(a) any person employed by, or acting for or on behalf of, any other person (who in this case is referred to in this Part as the person’s principal) in any capacity,(b) any person purporting to be, or intending to become, an agent of any other person (who in this case is referred to in this Part as the person’s principal), and(c) any person serving under the Crown (which in this case is referred to in this Part as the person’s principal), and(d) a police officer (and in this case a reference in this Part to the agent’s principal is a reference to the Crown).benefit includes money and any contingent benefit.s 249A: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2). Am 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [8].
249B Corrupt commissions or rewards
(1) If any agent corruptly receives or solicits (or corruptly agrees to receive or solicit) from another person for the agent or for anyone else any benefit:(a) as an inducement or reward for or otherwise on account of:(i) doing or not doing something, or having done or not having done something, orin relation to the affairs or business of the agent’s principal, or(ii) showing or not showing, or having shown or not having shown, favour or disfavour to any person,the agent is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) the receipt or any expectation of which would in any way tend to influence the agent to show, or not to show, favour or disfavour to any person in relation to the affairs or business of the agent’s principal,(2) If any person corruptly gives or offers to give to any agent, or to any other person with the consent or at the request of any agent, any benefit:(a) as an inducement or reward for or otherwise on account of the agent’s:(i) doing or not doing something, or having done or not having done something, orin relation to the affairs or business of the agent’s principal, or(ii) showing or not showing, or having shown or not having shown, favour or disfavour to any person,the firstmentioned person is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) the receipt or any expectation of which would in any way tend to influence the agent to show, or not to show, favour or disfavour to any person in relation to the affairs or business of the agent’s principal,(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), where a benefit is received or solicited by anyone with the consent or at the request of an agent, the agent shall be deemed to have received or solicited the benefit.ss 249B–249G: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249C Misleading documents or statements used or made by agents
(1) Any agent who uses, or gives to the agent’s principal, a document which contains anything that is false or misleading in any material respect, with intent to defraud the agent’s principal, is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(2) Any agent who makes a statement to the agent’s principal which is false or misleading in any material respect, with intent to defraud the principal, is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.ss 249B–249G: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249D Corrupt inducements for advice
(1) If a person corruptly gives a benefit to another person for giving advice to a third person, being advice which the person giving the benefit intends will influence the third person:(a) to enter into a contract with the person who gives the benefit, orand, at the time the benefit is given, the person who gives the benefit intends the giving of the benefit not be made known to the person advised, the person who gives the benefit is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) to appoint the person who gives the benefit to any office,(2) If a person corruptly receives a benefit for giving advice to another person, being advice which is likely to influence the other person:(a) to enter into a contract with the person who gave the benefit, orand, at the time the benefit is received, the person who receives the benefit intends the giving of the benefit not be made known to the person to be advised, the person who receives the benefit is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) to appoint the person who gave the benefit to any office,(3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2), where a benefit is given or received by anyone with the consent or at the request of another person, the other person shall be deemed to have given or received the benefit.(4) If any person corruptly offers or solicits a benefit for the giving of advice by one person to another:(a) intending that the advice will influence the person advised:(i) to enter into a contract with anyone, or(ii) to appoint anyone to any office, andthe firstmentioned person is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) intending that the giving or receipt of the benefit not be made known to the person advised,(5) In this section:(a) a reference to the giving of advice includes a reference to the providing of information orally or in writing,(b) a reference to entering into a contract includes a reference to offering to enter into a contract, and(c) a reference to the appointment of a person includes a reference to:(i) joining in the appointment of the person, and(ii) voting for or assisting in the election or appointment of the person.ss 249B–249G: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249E Corrupt benefits for trustees and others
(1) In this section, a reference to a person entrusted with property is a reference to:(a) a trustee of the property,(b) an executor or administrator appointed for the purpose of dealing with the property,(c) a person who, because of a power of attorney or a power of appointment, has authority over the property, and(d) a person or a member of a committee managing or administering the property (or appointed or employed to manage or administer the property) under the Mental Health Act 1958 or Protected Estates Act 1983.(2) Any person who offers or gives a benefit to a person entrusted with property, and any person entrusted with property who receives or solicits a benefit for anyone, without the consent:(a) of each person beneficially entitled to the property, oras an inducement or reward for the appointment of any person to be a person entrusted with the property, are each liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) of the Supreme Court,(3) In this section, a reference to the appointment of a person includes a reference to:(a) joining in the appointment of the person, and(b) assisting in the appointment of the person.(4) Proceedings for an offence under this section shall not be commenced without the consent of the Attorney General.(5) A consent to commence any such proceedings purporting to have been signed by the Attorney General is evidence of that consent without proof of the signature of the Attorney General.ss 249B–249G: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249F Aiding, abetting etc
(1) A person who aids, abets, counsels, procures, solicits or incites the commission of an offence under this Part is guilty of an offence and is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(2) A person who, in New South Wales, aids, abets, counsels or procures the commission of an offence in any place outside New South Wales, being an offence punishable under the provisions of a law in force in that place which corresponds to a provision of this Part, is guilty of an offence and is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.ss 249B–249G: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249G Repayment of value of gift etc
(1) If a person is convicted of an offence under this Part, the court may (as well as imposing a penalty for the offence) order the person to pay to such other person as the court directs the whole or part of the amount or the value, assessed by the court, of any benefit received or given by the person.(2) Any money payable to a person under this section may be recovered in a court of competent jurisdiction as a debt due to the person.ss 249B–249G: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249H Disqualification for office
If a person is convicted of an offence under this Part, the person is disqualified from holding civic office for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1993, for the period of 7 years from the conviction or such lesser period as the court may order.s 249H: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2). Am 1995 No 11, Sch 1.28 [1].
249I Dismissal of trivial case
If, in any proceedings for an offence under this Part, it appears to the court that the offence is of a trivial or merely technical nature, the court may in its discretion dismiss the case.s 249I: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
249J Custom not a defence
In any proceedings for an offence under this Part, it is not a defence that the receiving, soliciting, giving or offering of any benefit is customary in any trade, business, profession or calling.s 249J: Ins 1987 No 116, Sch 1 (2).
Part 5 Forgery and false instrument offences
pt 5, hdg: Subst 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (4).
Chapter 1 Forgery
Declaratory and general
250 Forging and uttering defined
For the purposes of this Act:Forging means the counterfeiting, or altering in any particular, by whatsoever means effected, with intent to defraud, of an instrument, or document, or of some signature, or other matter, or thing, or of any attestation, or signature of a witness, whether by law required or not to any instrument, document, or matter, the forging of which is punishable under this Act.Utter, or uttering, wherever used herein with respect to any forged instrument, document, signature, matter, or thing, or any instrument, document, or matter with a forged attestation or signature of a witness thereto, means that the person uttered, offered, disposed of, or put off, the same with intent to defraud, knowing it to be forged.
251 Uttering to be offence of same degree and subject to same punishment as forging
The uttering of any forged instrument, document, signature, matter, or thing, or of any instrument, document, or matter with a forged attestation or signature of a witness thereto, whether in any such case the same was made, or purports to have been made, in or out of New South Wales, shall, wherever the forging of the same is punishable under this Act, be an offence of the same degree, and punishable in the same manner as such forgery.
252 (Repealed)
s 252, hdg: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (6).
s 252: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
Forgery, &c, of public seals
253 Royal or public seals
Whosoever:s 253, hdg: Am 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (7).forges any of Her Majesty’s seals, or the seal of New South Wales, or of any British Colony, or the impression of any such seal, orutters any instrument, having thereon, or affixed thereto, the impression of any such forged seal, or any forged impression made, or apparently intended, to resemble the impression of any such seal, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.forges any instrument having any such impression thereon, or affixed thereto,
254 (Repealed)
s 254: Am 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (6). Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
Forgery of Acts, Proclamations, &c
255 Acts, proclamations etc
Whosoever:prints any copy of any Act, or of any proclamation or commission issued by the Governor, which copy falsely purports to have been printed by the Government Printer, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.tenders in evidence any such copy knowing the same was not printed by the Government Printer,
256–259 (Repealed)
s 256, hdg: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (6).
s 256: Am 1979 No 95, Sch 2. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 257: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1979 No 95, Sch 2. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 258: Am 1979 No 95, Sch 2. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 259: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
Forgery of India bonds, Exchequer bills, &c
260 East India bonds, Exchequer bills, or debentures etc
Whosoever forges, or utters, any East India bond, or any bond, debenture, or security made under the authority of any Act relating to the East Indies, or any indorsement on, or assignment of, any such bond, debenture, or security, or any Exchequer bill, bond, or debenture, or any indorsement on, or assignment of, any such bill, bond, or debenture, or any Treasury bill, or debenture of the Government of New South Wales, or receipt, or certificate for interest accruing thereon, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
261–264 (Repealed)
s 261: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 262: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 263: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 264 and hdg: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5), (6).
Forgery, &c, of, or engraving plate, &c, for, bank notes, &c
265 Forging etc a bank note etc
Whosoever:forges, or utters, any note, or bill of exchange, of any company or person carrying on the business of banking, whether in New South Wales or elsewhere, commonly called a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, or any indorsement on, or assignment of, any such note or bill, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.for any unlawful purpose, or without lawful authority or excuse, purchases or receives from any person, or has in his or her possession, any such forged bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, knowing the same to be forged,
266 Engraving or having any plate etc for making bank notes or paper
Whosoever, for any unlawful purpose, or without lawful authority or excuse,engraves, or makes, upon any material, any words or writing purporting to be a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, of any company or person carrying on the business of banking in New South Wales, or elsewhere, or to be part of any such instrument, or any name, word, or character, resembling or apparently intended to resemble any subscription to any such instrument, issued by any such company or person, oruses any material, or implement, or device, for making or printing any such instrument, or any part thereof, orknowingly has in his or her possession any such material, or any such implement or device, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.knowingly offers, utters, disposes of, or puts off, or has in his or her possession, any paper, upon which any such instrument, or any part thereof, or any name, word, or character, resembling or apparently intended to resemble any such subscription as aforesaid, is made or printed,
267 Engraving etc any part of a bank note etc
Whosoever, for any unlawful purpose, or without lawful authority or excuse,engraves, or makes upon any material any word, number, figure, device, character, or ornament, the impression taken from which resembles, or apparently is intended to resemble, any part of a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, of any company or person carrying on the business of banking in New South Wales or elsewhere, oruses, or knowingly has in his or her possession, any such material, or instrument, or device, for impressing upon paper or other material any word, number, figure, character, or ornament, which resembles or apparently is intended to resemble any part of any such note, or bill, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.knowingly offers, utters, disposes of, or puts off, or has in his or her possession, any paper or other material, upon which there is an impression of any such matter as aforesaid,
268 Instruments in blank
Every instrument in blank, which in a complete state would be a bank note, bank bill of exchange, or bank post bill, shall be within sections 266 and 267.s 268: Am 1951 No 31, Sch.
269 Having moulds for paper with the name of any banker
Whosoever, for any unlawful purpose, or without lawful authority or excuse,makes or uses, any frame, mould, or instrument for the manufacture of paper, with the name or firm of any company or person carrying on the business of banking in New South Wales or elsewhere appearing visible in the substance of the paper, or knowingly has in his or her possession any such frame, mould, or instrument, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.makes, uses, sells, exposes for sale, utters, or disposes of, or knowingly has in his or her possession, any paper, in the substance of which the name or firm of any such company or person appears visible, or by any art or contrivance causes the name or firm of any such company or person to appear visible in the substance of the paper upon which the same is written or printed,
270 Engraving plates for foreign bills or notes
Whosoever, for any unlawful purpose, or without lawful authority or excuse,engraves, or makes upon any material, any bill of exchange, promissory-note, undertaking, or order for payment of money, or any part of any such instrument, in whatsoever language the same is expressed, and whether the same is under seal or not, or intended to be under seal, purporting to be the bill, note, undertaking, or order, or part of the bill, note, undertaking, or order of a foreign prince or State, or any body corporate, or body of the like nature, or person or company of persons, in any country not under the dominion of Her Majesty, oruses, or knowingly has in his or her possession any material upon which any such foreign bill, note, undertaking, or order, or any part thereof, is engraved, or made, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.knowingly offers, utters, disposes of, or puts off, or has in his or her possession, any paper upon which any part of any such instrument is made or printed,
Forgery, &c, of wills, &c
271 Forging wills
Whosoever forges, or utters, any will, testament, codicil, or testamentary instrument shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.s 271, hdg: Am 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (8).s 271: Am 1974 No 50, sec 7 (a).
272–276 (Repealed)
s 272: Am 1979 No 95, Sch 2. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 273: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 274: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 275: Am 1924 No 10, sec 10. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 276: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
Forgery of signature of Judge
277 (Repealed)
s 277, hdg: Subst 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (9).
s 277: Am 1970 No 52, Second Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
278 Forging signature of Supreme Court Judge to decree etc or tendering same in evidence with forged signature
Whosoever:forges the signature of any Judge of the Supreme Court purporting to be attached or appended to any decree, order, certificate, or other official, or judicial document, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.tenders in evidence any such decree, order, certificate, or document, as aforesaid, with a false or counterfeit signature of any such Judge thereto, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit,
279–283 (Repealed)
s 279, hdg: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (6).
s 279: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (7). Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 280–284: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
Forgery, &c, of instruments of evidence
284 (Repealed)
s 280–284: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
285 Forgery of signature to copies etc admissible in evidence of decrees etc
Whosoever, where any copy of any judgment, decree, rule, or order filed or recorded in the Supreme Court at Sydney, or formerly filed or recorded in the Supreme Court of New South Wales for the district of Port Phillip, is admissible in evidence when certified under the hand of the proper officer of such Court,forges the signature of such officer to any such copy, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.tenders in evidence any such copy with a false or counterfeit signature thereto, knowing the same to be false,
286–288 (Repealed)
s 286: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 287: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 288: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
289 Forgery of seal etc on public documents etc and copies admissible in evidence
Whosoever, where any certificate, or official, or public document, or any document or proceeding of any corporation, or joint stock or other company, now or hereafter to be established, or any certified copy of any document, or by-law, or entry in any register or other book, or of any other proceeding, is admissible in evidence under any Act, now or hereafter in force, when purporting to be sealed or stamped and signed as directed by the Act under which the same is so admissible,forges the seal, stamp, or signature appended to any such certificate, or document, or proceeding, or to any such certified copy, as aforesaid, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.tenders in evidence any such certificate, or document, or proceeding, or any such certified copy, as aforesaid, with a false or counterfeit seal, stamp, or signature thereto, knowing the same to be false or counterfeit,
290 (Repealed)
s 290: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
291 Forging etc certificate issued by officer outside New South Wales
Whosoever, where a certificate of the birth, marriage, or death, of any person in any part of the British dominions other than New South Wales, is admissible in evidence when purporting to be issued by the officer authorised by the law in that behalf of such part of the said dominions,forges, or utters any such certificate, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.tenders, or causes to be tendered, in evidence any such certificate, knowing the same to be forged,
292–295 (Repealed)
s 292: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 293 and hdg: Am 1984 No 22, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5), (6).
s 294, hdg: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (6).
s 294: Am 1978 No 166, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5).
s 295 and hdg: Rep 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (5), (6).
Falsifying entries of births, deaths, &c
296 Falsifying entries of births etc or giving false certificates
Whosoever:unlawfully destroys, defaces, or injures, any register of births, marriages, deaths, or burials, now or hereafter by law required to be kept, or any certified copy of any such register, orforges, or fraudulently obliterates, or alters in any such register or copy, any entry relating to any birth, marriage, death, or burial, or fraudulently inserts in any such register or copy any false entry, or matter relating to any such matter, orfraudulently gives any false certificate relating to any birth, marriage, death, or burial, or certifies any writing to be a copy, or extract from, any such register, knowing such writing or the entry to which it relates to be false, orforges, or utters, the signature, or any seal, or stamp, of or belonging to, or used by, the Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.causes, or knowingly permits, the doing of any such act as aforesaid,s 296: Am 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (8); 1995 No 62, Sch 2.
297 Making false entries in copies sent to registrar
Whosoever:wilfully inserts, in any copy of any register required by law to be transmitted to a registrar, any false entry or matter relating to any birth, marriage, or burial, orforges, or utters, any copy of any such register, or wilfully signs, or verifies, any copy of any such register, which copy is false in any part, knowing the same to be false, orforges, or unlawfully destroys, defaces, or injures, or for any fraudulent purpose takes from its place of deposit, or conceals, any such register or copy, orshall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.causes, or knowingly permits, the doing of any such act as aforesaid,
Obtaining or demanding property on forged instruments
298 Demanding property on forged instruments
Whosoever, with intent to defraud, obtains, or demands, or causes to be delivered, or paid to any person, or endeavours to obtain, or cause to be delivered, or paid to any person, any property, upon or by virtue of any forged instrument, knowing the same to be forged, or upon or by virtue of any probate, or letters of administration, knowing the will, codicil, or testamentary writing, on which the same was, or were, obtained, to have been forged, or such probate, or letters, to have been obtained by any false oath or affirmation, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.
Chapter 2 False instruments
pt 5, ch 2: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).
299 Interpretation
(1) In this Chapter:instrument means:(a) any document, whether of a formal or informal character, or(b) a card by means of which property or credit can be obtained, or(c) a disc, tape, sound track or other device on or in which information is recorded or stored by mechanical, electronic or other means.(2) For the purposes of this Chapter, an instrument is false if it purports:(a) to have been made in the form in which it is made by a person who did not in fact make it in that form, or(b) to have been made in the form in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in that form, or(c) to have been made in the terms in which it is made by a person who did not in fact make it in those terms, or(d) to have been made in the terms in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in those terms, or(e) to have been altered in any respect by a person who did not in fact alter it in that respect, or(f) to have been altered in any respect on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise the alteration in that respect, or(g) to have been made or altered on a date on which, or at a place at which, or otherwise in circumstances in which, it was not in fact made or altered, or(h) to have been made or altered by an existing person who did not in fact exist.ss 299–302: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
300 Making or using false instruments
(1) A person who makes a false instrument, with the intention that he or she, or another person, will use it to induce another person:(a) to accept the instrument as genuine, andis liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to that other person’s, or to another person’s, prejudice,(2) A person who uses an instrument which is, and which the person knows to be, false, with the intention of inducing another person:(a) to accept the instrument as genuine, andis liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to that other person’s, or to another person’s, prejudice,ss 299–302: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
301 Making or using copies of false instruments
(1) A person who makes a copy of an instrument which is, and which the person knows to be, a false instrument, with the intention that he or she, or another person, will use it to induce another person:(a) to accept the copy as a copy of a genuine instrument, andis liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to that other person’s, or to another person’s, prejudice,(2) A person who uses a copy of an instrument which is, and which he or she knows to be a false instrument, with the intention of inducing another person:(a) to accept the copy as a copy of a genuine instrument, andis liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to that other person’s, or to another person’s, prejudice,ss 299–302: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
302 Custody of false instruments etc
A person who has in his or her custody, or under his or her control, an instrument which is false, and which he or she knows to be false, with the intention that the person or another person will use it to induce another person:(a) to accept the instrument as genuine, andis liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to that other person’s, or to another person’s, prejudice,ss 299–302: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
302A Making or possession of implements for making false instruments
A person who makes, or who has in his or her custody or under his or her control, a machine or implement, or paper or other material, that is, and that the person knows to be, specially designed or adapted for the making of a false instrument, with the intention that he or she or another person will use it to induce another person:(a) to accept the instrument as genuine, andis liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) because of that acceptance, to do or not do some act to that other person’s or to another person’s prejudice,s 302A: Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
303 Response of machine to false instrument etc
(1) In this Chapter, a reference to inducing a person to accept:(a) a false instrument as genuine, orincludes a reference to causing a machine to respond to the instrument or copy as if it were a genuine instrument or a copy of a genuine instrument.(b) a copy of a false instrument as a copy of a genuine instrument,(2) If:(a) a machine responds to an instrument or copy in that way, andthe act or omission intended to be caused by the machine’s so responding shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, be taken to be an act or omission to a person’s prejudice.(b) the act or omission intended to be caused by the response is an act or omission that would be (if it were an act or omission of a person) to a person’s prejudice,ss 303–307: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
304 When a false instrument is made
For the purposes of this Chapter, a person is to be treated as making a false instrument if the person alters an instrument so as to make it false in any respect (whether or not it is false in some other respect apart from that alteration).ss 303–307: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
305 When an act or omission is prejudicial
For the purposes of this Chapter, an act or omission is to a person’s prejudice if, and only if, it is one that (if it occurs):(a) will result:(i) in the person’s temporary or permanent loss of property, or(ii) in the person’s being deprived of an opportunity to earn remuneration or greater remuneration, or(iii) in the person’s being deprived of an opportunity to obtain a financial advantage otherwise than by way of remuneration, or(b) will result in any person being given an opportunity:(i) to earn remuneration or greater remuneration from the first-mentioned person, or(ii) to obtain a financial advantage from the first-mentioned person otherwise than by way of remuneration, or(c) will be the result of the person’s having accepted a false instrument as genuine, or a copy of a false instrument as a copy of a genuine one, in connection with the person’s performance of a duty.ss 303–307: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
306 Intention to induce may be general
In proceedings for an offence against this Chapter, if it is necessary to allege an intent to induce a person to accept:(a) a false instrument as genuine, orit is not necessary to allege that the accused intended so to induce a particular person.(b) a copy of a false instrument as a copy of a genuine one,ss 303–307: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
307 Abolition of common law offence
The offence of forgery at common law is abolished for all purposes not relating to offences committed before the commencement of this Chapter (as inserted by the Crimes (Computers and Forgery) Amendment Act 1989).ss 303–307: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (10).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
Part 6 Offences relating to computers
pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).
pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.
pt 6: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (11).
308 Definitions
In this Part:(a) a reference to data includes a reference to information, and(b) a reference to a program or data includes a reference to part of the program or data, and(c) a reference to data stored in a computer includes a reference to data entered or copied into the computer.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 308: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (11).
309 Unlawful access to data in computer
(1) A person who, without authority or lawful excuse, intentionally obtains access to a program or data stored in a computer is liable, on conviction before two justices, to imprisonment for 6 months, or to a fine of 50 penalty units, or both.(2) A person who, with intent:(a) to defraud any person, or(b) to dishonestly obtain for himself or herself or another person any financial advantage of any kind, orobtains access to a program or data stored in a computer is liable to imprisonment for 2 years, or to a fine of 500 penalty units, or both.(c) to dishonestly cause loss or injury to any person,(3) A person who, without authority or lawful excuse, intentionally obtains access to a program or data stored in a computer, being a program or data that the person knows or ought reasonably to know relates to:(a) confidential government information in relation to security, defence or inter-governmental relations, or(b) the existence or identity of any confidential source of information in relation to the enforcement or administration of the law, or(c) the enforcement or administration of the criminal law, or(d) the maintenance or enforcement of any lawful method or procedure for protecting public safety, or(e) the personal affairs of any person (whether living or deceased), or(f) trade secrets, or(g) records of a financial institution, oris liable to imprisonment for 2 years, or to a fine of 500 penalty units, or both.(h) information (other than trade secrets) that has a commercial value to any person that could be destroyed or diminished if disclosed,(4) A person who:(a) without authority or lawful excuse, has intentionally obtained access to a program or data stored in a computer, and(b) after examining part of that program or data, knows or ought reasonably to know that the part of the program or data examined relates wholly or partly to any of the matters referred to in subsection (3), andis liable to imprisonment for 2 years, or to a fine of 500 penalty units, or both.(c) continues to examine that program or data,(5) A prosecution for an offence under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within 2 years after the time when the offence is alleged to have been committed.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 309: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (11). Am 1992 No 112, Sch 1; 1994 No 32, Sch 1; 1997 No 85, Sch 1.2 [2].
310 Damaging data in computer
A person who intentionally and without authority or lawful excuse:(a) destroys, erases or alters data stored in or inserts data into a computer, oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years, or to a fine of 1,000 penalty units, or both.(b) interferes with, or interrupts or obstructs the lawful use of a computer,pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 310: Ins 1989 No 71, Sch 1 (11). Am 1992 No 112, Sch 1.
Part 6A
310A (Repealed)
pt 6A (s 310A): Ins 1995 No 49, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1995 No 63, Sch 2 [3].
Part 7 Public justice offences
pt 7: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
Chapter 1 Definitions
311 Definitions
(1) In this Part:benefit means any benefit or advantage whether or not in money or money’s worth.judicial officer means a person who is, or who alone or with others constitutes, a judicial tribunal and includes a coroner.judicial proceeding means a proceeding in or before a judicial tribunal in which evidence may be taken on oath.judicial tribunal means a person (including a coroner and an arbitrator), court or body authorised by law, or by consent of parties, to conduct a hearing for the purpose of the determination of any matter or thing and includes a person, court or body authorised to conduct a committal proceeding.public justice official means a person who is a public officer employed in any capacity (other than as a judicial officer) for the investigation, detection or prosecution of offenders.serious offence means an offence punishable by imprisonment or penal servitude for 5 years or more or for life.(2) In this Part, a reference to the making of a statement on oath includes a reference to the verification of a statement on oath.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 311: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2). Am 1993 No 79, sec 5.
312 Meaning of “pervert the course of justice”
A reference in this Part to perverting the course of justice is a reference to obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating the course of justice or the administration of the law.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 312–315: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
313 Knowledge that offence is a serious offence is unnecessary
If it is an element of an offence under this Part that an offence is a serious offence, it is not necessary for the prosecution to establish that the accused knew that the offence was a serious offence.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 312–315: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
Chapter 2 Interference with the administration of justice
314 False accusations etc
A person who makes an accusation intending a person to be the subject of an investigation of an offence, knowing that other person to be innocent of the offence, is liable to penal servitude for 7 years.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 312–315: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
315 Hindering investigation etc
(1) A person who does anything intending in any way to hinder:(a) the investigation of a serious offence committed by another person, or(b) the discovery of evidence concerning a serious offence committed by another person, oris liable to penal servitude for 7 years.(c) the apprehension of another person who has committed a serious offence,(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a person is to be considered to have committed a serious offence if a public officer engaged in the detection or investigation of offenders suspects on reasonable grounds that a person has committed the offence.(3) It is not an offence against this section merely to refuse or fail to divulge information or produce evidence.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 312–315: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
316 Concealing serious offence
(1) If a person has committed a serious offence and another person who knows or believes that the offence has been committed and that he or she has information which might be of material assistance in securing the apprehension of the offender or the prosecution or conviction of the offender for it fails without reasonable excuse to bring that information to the attention of a member of the Police Force or other appropriate authority, that other person is liable to imprisonment for 2 years.(2) A person who solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any benefit for himself or herself or any other person in consideration for doing anything that would be an offence under subsection (1) is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(3) It is not an offence against subsection (2) merely to solicit, accept or agree to accept the making good of loss or injury caused by an offence or the making of reasonable compensation for that loss or injury.(4) A prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) is not to be commenced against a person without the approval of the Attorney General if the knowledge or belief that an offence has been committed was formed or the information referred to in the subsection was obtained by the person in the course of practising or following a profession, calling or vocation prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this subsection.(5) The regulations may prescribe a profession, calling or vocation as referred to in subsection (4).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 316: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2). Am 1997 No 85, Sch 1.2 [3]; 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [6].
317 Tampering etc with evidence
A person who, with intent to mislead any judicial tribunal in any judicial proceeding:(a) suppresses, conceals, destroys, alters or falsifies anything knowing that it is or may be required as evidence in any judicial proceeding, or(b) fabricates false evidence (other than by perjury or suborning perjury), oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(c) knowingly makes use of fabricated false evidence,pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
318 Making or using false official instrument to pervert the course of justice
(1) In this section:official instrument means an instrument of a kind that is made or issued by a person in his or her capacity as a public officer or by a judicial tribunal.(2) A person who makes a false official instrument, or who makes a copy of an instrument which the person knows to be a false official instrument, with the intention that:(a) he or she or another person will use it to induce another person to accept the instrument as genuine or to accept the copy as a copy of a genuine official instrument, andis liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(b) that acceptance will pervert the course of justice,(3) A person who uses an instrument which the person knows to be a false official instrument, or who uses a copy of an instrument which the person knows to be a false official instrument, with the intention:(a) of inducing another person to accept the instrument as genuine or to accept the copy as a copy of a genuine official instrument, andis liable to penal servitude for 14 years.(b) of thereby perverting the course of justice,(4) Chapter 2 of Part 5 applies to the interpretation of this section as if this section formed part of that Chapter.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
319 General offence of perverting the course of justice
A person who does any act, or makes any omission, intending in any way to pervert the course of justice, is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
Chapter 3 Interference with judicial officers, witnesses, jurors etc
320 Extended meaning of “giving evidence”
In this Chapter, a reference to the giving of evidence includes a reference to the production of anything to be used as evidence.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
321 Corruption of witnesses and jurors
(1) A person who confers or procures or offers to confer or procure or attempt to procure any benefit on or for any person:(a) intending to influence any person called or to be called as a witness in any judicial proceeding to give false evidence or withhold true evidence or to not attend as a witness or not produce anything in evidence pursuant to a summons or subpoena, oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) intending to influence any person (whether or not a particular person) in the person’s conduct as a juror in any judicial proceeding or to not attend as a juror in any judicial proceeding, whether he or she has been sworn as a juror or not, and intending to pervert the course of justice,(2) A person who solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any benefit for himself or herself or any other person:(a) in consideration for any agreement or undertaking that any person will as a witness in any judicial proceeding give false evidence or withhold true evidence or not attend as a witness or not produce anything in evidence pursuant to a summons or subpoena, oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(b) on account of anything to be done or omitted to be done by him or her or another person as a juror in any judicial proceeding, or on account of his or her or another person’s not attending as a juror in any judicial proceeding, intending to pervert the course of justice,pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
322 Threatening or intimidating judges, witnesses, jurors etc
A person who threatens to do or cause, or who does or causes, any injury or detriment to any person:(a) intending to influence a person called or to be called as a witness in any judicial proceeding to give false evidence or withhold true evidence or to not attend as a witness or not produce anything in evidence pursuant to a summons or subpoena, or(b) intending to influence any person (whether or not a particular person) in the person’s conduct as a juror in any judicial proceeding or to not attend as a juror in any judicial proceeding, whether he or she has been sworn as a juror or not, or(c) intending to influence any person in the person’s conduct as a judicial officer, oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(d) intending to influence any person in the person’s conduct as a public justice official in or in connection with any judicial proceeding,pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
323 Influencing witnesses and jurors
A person who does any act:(a) intending to procure, persuade, induce or otherwise cause any person called or to be called as a witness in any judicial proceeding to give false evidence or withhold true evidence or to not attend as a witness or not produce any thing in evidence pursuant to a summons or subpoena, oris liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(b) intending, other than by the production of evidence and argument in open court, to influence any person (whether or not a particular person) in the person’s conduct as a juror in any judicial proceeding, whether he or she has been sworn as a juror or not,pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
324 Increased penalty if serious offence involved
A person who commits an offence against section 321, 322 or 323 (offences concerning interference with witnesses, jurors, judicial officers and public justice officials) intending to procure the conviction or acquittal of any person of any serious offence is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.ss 317–324: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
325 Preventing, obstructing or dissuading witness or juror from attending etc
(1) A person who without lawful excuse wilfully prevents, obstructs or dissuades a person called as a witness in any judicial proceeding from attending as a witness or from producing anything in evidence pursuant to a summons or subpoena is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(1A) A person who without lawful excuse wilfully prevents, obstructs or dissuades another person who the person believes may be called as a witness in any judicial proceeding from attending the proceeding is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(2) A person who without lawful excuse wilfully prevents, obstructs or dissuades a person summoned as a juror in any judicial proceeding from attending as a juror is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 325: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2). Am 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [9].
326 Reprisals against judges, witnesses, jurors etc
(1) A person who threatens to do or cause, or who does or causes, any injury or detriment to any person on account of anything lawfully done by a person:(a) as a witness or juror in any judicial proceeding, or(b) as a judicial officer, oris liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(c) as a public justice official in or in connection with any judicial proceeding,(2) A person who threatens to do or cause, or who does or causes, any injury or detriment to another person because the person believes the other person will or may be or may have been called as a witness, or will or may serve or may have served as a juror, in any judicial proceeding is liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(3) For the purposes of this section, it is immaterial whether the accused acted wholly or partly for a reason specified in subsection (1) or (2).pt 6 (ss 300–326): Rep 1951 No 31, sec 5 (b).pt 6 (ss 299–326): Ins 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1986 No 133, sec 4 (b). For information concerning sec 299 before the commencement of 1983 No 184, Sch 1 (2) see the historical table of amendments, item (2) in the Legislative history.s 326: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2). Am 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [10].
Chapter 4 Perjury, false statements etc
327 Offence of perjury
(1) Any person who in or in connection with any judicial proceeding makes any false statement on oath concerning any matter which is material to the proceeding, knowing the statement to be false or not believing it to be true, is guilty of perjury and liable to penal servitude for 10 years.(2) A statement can be considered to have been made in connection with a judicial proceeding whether or not a judicial proceeding has commenced, or ever commences, in connection with it.(3) The determination of whether a statement is material to a judicial proceeding that has not commenced is to be made on the basis of any judicial proceeding likely to arise in connection with the statement.(4) The question of whether any matter is material to a proceeding is a question of law.s 327: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
328 Perjury with intent to procure conviction or acquittal
Any person who commits perjury intending to procure the conviction or acquittal of any person of any serious offence is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.s 328: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
329 Conviction for false swearing on indictment for perjury
If on the trial of a person for perjury the jury is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of perjury but is satisfied on the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offence under section 330 (False statement on oath not amounting to perjury) it may find the accused not guilty of the offence charged but guilty of the latter offence and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.s 329: Am 1951 No 31, Sch. Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
330 False statement on oath not amounting to perjury
A person who makes on oath any false statement knowing the statement to be false or not believing it to be true, if it is not perjury, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.ss 330–332: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
331 Contradictory statements on oath
If on the trial of a person for perjury or for an offence under section 330 (False statement on oath not amounting to perjury):(a) the jury is satisfied that the accused has made 2 statements on oath and one is irreconcilably in conflict with the other, andthe jury may make a special finding to that effect and find the accused guilty of perjury or of an offence under section 330, as appropriate, and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(b) the jury is satisfied that one of the statements was made by the accused knowing it was false or not believing it was true but the jury cannot say which statement was so made,ss 330–332: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
332 Certain technical defects provided for
If on the trial of a person for perjury or for an offence under section 330 (False statement on oath not amounting to perjury):(a) any affidavit, deposition, examination or declaration offered in evidence is wrongly entitled or otherwise informal or defective, orthe accused is not entitled to an acquittal because of the omission, defect or informality but the instrument (if otherwise admissible) may be given in evidence and used for all purposes of the trial.(b) the jurat to any such instrument is informal or defective,ss 330–332: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
333 Subornation of perjury
(1) A person who procures, persuades, induces or otherwise causes a person to give false testimony the giving of which is perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury and liable to imprisonment for 7 years.(2) A person who commits subornation of perjury intending to procure the conviction or acquittal of any person of any serious offence is liable to penal servitude for 14 years.s 333: Rep 1985 No 149, Sch 1 (2). Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
334 General provisions applicable to perjury and false statement offences
It is immaterial for the purposes of this Chapter:(a) whether a statement on oath is given orally or in writing, or(b) which forms and ceremonies are used in administering the oath (or otherwise binding the person giving the testimony to speak the truth) so long as the person assents to the forms and ceremonies actually used, or(c) whether (in the case of a statement made in a judicial proceeding) the judicial tribunal concerned is properly constituted or held in the proper place or not, so long as it actually acts as a judicial tribunal in the proceeding in which the statement is made, or(d) whether the person who makes the statement is a competent witness or not, or whether the statement is admissible in the proceeding or not, or(e) in the case of judicial proceedings in an arbitration, whether the law governing the arbitration agreement or the proceedings, or any other relevant law, is or is not the law of New South Wales.s 334: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
335 False statements in evidence on commission
If a person, in giving any testimony (either orally or in writing) otherwise than on oath, when required to do so by an order under section 33 (Power of the Supreme Court to give effect to application for assistance) of the Evidence on Commission Act 1995, makes any statement that is false in a material particular, knowing the statement to be false or not believing it to be true, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.s 335: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2). Am 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
336 False entry on public register
(1) A person who for an improper purpose makes a statement for the making of an entry in any register kept by a public officer for a public purpose, knowing the statement to be false or misleading in a material particular, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.(2) A person who for an improper purpose makes an entry in any register kept by a public officer for a public purpose, knowing the entry to be false or misleading in a material particular, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.s 336: Am 1974 No 50, sec 7 (b). Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
337 False instruments issued by public officers
A public officer who, being authorised or required to issue an instrument whereby any person may be prejudicially affected, issues the instrument for an improper purpose knowing it to be false in a material particular is liable to imprisonment for 5 years.s 337: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
338 Restrictions on prosecutions for perjury
(1) A person is not to be prosecuted for perjury except:(a) by the Director of Public Prosecutions, or(b) at the direction of the Attorney General, or(c) by any other person with leave of the judicial officer who constituted the judicial tribunal before which the perjury is alleged to have been committed.(2) If it is impossible or impracticable to apply for leave to prosecute in accordance with subsection (1) (c), the prosecution may be instituted with leave of the Supreme Court.(3) A person is not to be prosecuted for perjury (except by the Director of Public Prosecutions or at the direction of the Attorney General) unless notice of the proposed prosecution has been given to the Director of Public Prosecutions.s 338: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (x). Ins 1988 No 64, Sch 2 (1). Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
339 Application of Chapter to perjury under other Acts
Any false oath declared by any Act to be perjury or made punishable as perjury by any Act is to be considered to be perjury for the purposes of this Act.s 339: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
Chapter 5 Miscellaneous
340 Extent of abolition of offences
The offences at common law abolished by this Chapter are abolished for all purposes not relating to offences committed before the commencement of this Part (as substituted by the Crimes (Public Justice) Amendment Act 1990).s 340: Am 1924 No 10, sec 11 (a); 1951 No 31, sec 2 (y); 1978 No 166, Sch 1 (3); 1980 No 43, Schs 1 (4), 2 (10); 1982 No 81, Sch 1 (2) (rep); 1987 No 58, Sch 3; 1987 No 273, Sch 1. Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
341 Certain common law offences abolished
The following offences at common law are abolished:• the offence of perverting the course of justice,• the offence of attempting or conspiring to pervert the course of justice,• the offence of falsely accusing a person of a crime or of procuring a person to falsely accuse a person of a crime,• the offence of concealing evidence so that a person is falsely accused of a crime,• the offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice by assisting a person to avoid arrest,• the offence of persuading a person to make a false statement to police to mislead them in their investigation,• the offence of procuring a person to make a false accusation,• the offence of misprision of felony,• the offence of compounding a felony,• the offence of dissuading, intimidating or preventing, or attempting to dissuade, intimidate or prevent, a person who is bound to give evidence in a criminal matter from doing so,• the offence of using threats or persuasion to witnesses to induce them not to appear or give evidence in courts of justice,• the offence of perjury,• the offence of embracery (attempting to corrupt, influence or instruct a jury or to induce a jury to favour one side more than the other),• personating a juror.s 341: Am 1924 No 10, sec 11 (b); 1929 No 2, sec 9; 1951 No 31, Sch; 1980 No 53, Schs 1 (5), 2 (11). Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
342 Certain conspiracy offences not affected
The abolition of the common law offence of conspiring to pervert the course of justice does not prevent a prosecution for an offence of conspiring to commit an offence against this Part.s 342: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
343 Certain common law offences not abolished
To remove any doubt, it is declared that the following offences at common law are not abolished by this Chapter:(a) the offence of escaping from lawful custody,(b) the offence of assisting a person to escape from lawful custody,(c) the offence of refusing to assist a peace officer in the execution of his or her duty in preventing a breach of the peace.s 343: Subst 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
343A Saving of other punishments
Nothing in this Part prevents or affects any other punishment, or any forfeiture, provided under any Act.s 343A: Ins 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
Part 8
344 (Repealed)
pt 8 (s 344): Rep 1990 No 51, Sch 1 (2).
Part 8A Attempts
pt 8A (s 344A): Ins 1974 No 50, sec 7 (c).
344A Attempts
(1) Subject to this Act, any person who attempts to commit any offence for which a penalty is provided under this Act shall be liable to that penalty.(2) Where a person is convicted of an attempt to commit an offence and the offence concerned is a felony the person shall be deemed to have been convicted of a felony.pt 8A (s 344A): Ins 1974 No 50, sec 7 (c).
Part 9 Abettors and accessories
345 Principals in the second degree—how tried and punished
Every principal in the second degree in any felony, whether the same is a felony at Common Law, or by this or any other statute, now existing or hereafter to be passed, shall be liable to the same punishment as the principal in the first degree.s 345: Am 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (3).
346 Accessories before the fact—how tried and punished
Every accessory before the fact to any such felony may be indicted, convicted, and sentenced, either before or after the trial of the principal felon, or together with such felon, or indicted, convicted, and sentenced, as a principal in the felony, and shall be liable in either case to the same punishment as the principal felon, whether the principal felon has been tried or not, or is amenable to justice or not.
347 Accessories after the fact—how tried and punished
Every accessory after the fact to any such felony may be indicted, convicted, and sentenced as such accessory, either before, or together with, or after the trial of the principal felon, whether such felon has been previously tried or not, or is amenable to justice or not.
348 Punishment of accessories after the fact to treason
Every accessory after the fact to any felony under Part 2, relating to treason-felony, shall be liable to imprisonment for two years.
349 Punishment of accessories after the fact to murder etc
(1) Every accessory after the fact to murder shall be liable to penal servitude for 25 years.(2) Every accessory after the fact to the crime of robbery with arms or in company with one or more person or persons, or the crime of kidnapping referred to in section 90A, shall be liable to penal servitude for fourteen years.s 349: Subst 1951 No 31, sec 6 (b). Am 1961 No 70, sec 2 (c); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (25).
350 Punishment of accessories after the fact to other felonies etc
Every accessory after the fact to any other felony, except where otherwise specifically enacted, whether a felony at Common Law or by Statute, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
351 Abettors in misdemeanours—how tried and punished
Any person who aids, abets, counsels, or procures, the commission of any misdemeanour, whether the same is a misdemeanour at Common Law or by any statute, may be indicted, convicted, and punished as a principal offender.s 351: Am 1974 No 50, sec 7 (d).
Part 10 Arrest of offenders
pt 10, hdg: Am 1982 No 116, Sch 2 (2); 1985 No 38, Sch 1. Subst 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [2].
352 Person in act of committing or having committed offence
s 352, hdg: Rep 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [3].(1) Any constable or other person may without warrant apprehend,(a) any person in the act of committing, or immediately after having committed, an offence punishable, whether by indictment, or on summary conviction, under any Act,and take the person, and any property found upon the person, before an authorised Justice to be dealt with according to law.(b) any person who has committed a felony for which the person has not been tried,(2) Any constable may without warrant apprehend,(a) any person whom the constable, with reasonable cause, suspects of having committed any such offence or crime,and take the person, and any property found upon the person, before an authorised Justice to be dealt with according to law.(b) any person lying, or loitering, in any highway, yard, or other place during the night, whom the constable, with reasonable cause, suspects of being about to commit any felony,(3) Any constable may, although the warrant is not at the time in his or her possession, apprehend any person for whose apprehension for a misdemeanour, or an offence punishable as a misdemeanour, a warrant has been issued, and take the person, and any property found upon the person, before an authorised Justice to be dealt with according to law.(4) Any constable may, although the warrant is not at the time in his or her possession, apprehend any person for whose apprehension on any ground other than a charge of felony or misdemeanour or offence punishable as a misdemeanour a warrant has been lawfully issued, provided the issue of such warrant has been certified by telegraph by the Commissioner of Police or by the Justice who has signed such warrant.(5) In this section:means:(a) a Magistrate, or(b) a Justice employed in the Department of Courts Administration.telegraph includes telephone, radio, telex, facsimile transmission, computer used to relay information and any other communication device.s 352: Am 1924 No 10, sec 12; 1935 No 13, sec 7 (1); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (5); 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (8).
352AA Arrest of prisoners unlawfully at large
(1) Any constable may, with or without warrant, apprehend any person whom the constable, with reasonable cause, suspects of being a prisoner unlawfully at large and take the person before an authorised Justice who may, by warrant, commit the person to prison, there to be kept in custody under the same authority, and subject to the same conditions and with the benefit of the same privileges and entitlements, as would have applied in respect of the person had the person not been at large.(2) A reference in subsection (1) to a prisoner unlawfully at large is a reference to a person who is at large (otherwise than by reason of having escaped from lawful custody) at a time when the person is required by law to be in custody in prison.(3) A constable may apply to an authorised Justice for a warrant for the apprehension of a prisoner whom the constable, with reasonable cause, suspects of being a prisoner unlawfully at large.(4) The authorised Justice to whom an application is made under subsection (3) may, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for doing so, issue a warrant for the apprehension of the prisoner concerned.(5) Section 64 of the Justices Act 1902 applies, with any necessary adaptations, to such a warrant in the same way as it applies to a warrant referred to in that section.(6) In this section, means:(a) a Magistrate, or(b) a Justice employed in the Local Courts Administration, Attorney General’s Department.s 352AA: Ins 1985 No 27, sec 2. Am 1986 No 16, Sch 6; 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (6).
352A Power of arrest in cases of certain offences committed outside the State
(1) This section applies to an offence:(a) that is an offence against the law of a State (other than New South Wales) or a Territory of the Commonwealth, and(b) that consists of an act or omission which, if it occurred in New South Wales, would constitute:(i) an indictable offence, or(ii) an offence punishable by imprisonment for 2 years or more.(2) A member of the police force may, at any hour of the day or night and without any warrant other than this Act, apprehend any person whom he or she has reasonable cause to suspect of having committed an offence to which this section applies.(3) A person apprehended under this section shall be brought as soon as practicable before a court and the court:(a) may discharge the person, or(b) may:(i) commit the person to custody, orpending the execution under a law of the Commonwealth of a warrant or provisional warrant for the person’s apprehension or the person’s earlier release from bail, or discharge from custody, under subsection (7).(ii) admit the person to bail,(4) Subject to this section, a person apprehended under this section for an offence to which this section applies shall generally have the same rights, and be liable to be dealt with in the same way, as a person charged with the commission of the like offence in New South Wales, and in particular:(a) a member of the police force may exercise, in respect of a person so apprehended, the powers conferred on him or her by section 353A, as if the person were in lawful custody upon a charge or for any crime referred to in that section, and(b) the provisions of:(i) the Bail Act 1978, andshall, with such modifications as may be necessary, apply in relation to the admission of any such person to bail and in relation to proceedings before a court under this section.(ii) the Justices Act 1902,(5) Where a person has been committed to custody under subsection (3) (b) (i) and a warrant for the person’s apprehension is subsequently presented for execution, the person shall be delivered in accordance with the terms of the warrant to the custody of the person executing it.(6) Where a person has been admitted to bail under subsection (3) (b) (ii) or under Part 3 of the Bail Act 1978, and subsequently, but before the person has complied with his or her bail undertaking, a warrant for his or her apprehension is executed under a law of the Commonwealth, the person shall be deemed, at the time the warrant is executed to be released from that bail and to have complied with any condition or undertaking in relation to that bail at that time outstanding, not being a condition or undertaking with which the person has by that time failed, without lawful excuse, to comply.(7) Where:(a) a person has been admitted to bail or, under subsection (3) (b), committed to custody, andthe person may be released from bail or shall be discharged from custody, as the case may require, by order of a court.(b) a warrant or provisional warrant for the person’s apprehension is not executed within a reasonable time (not exceeding 7 days) thereafter,(8) In this section court has the same meaning as it has in the Bail Act 1978.s 352A: Ins 1983 No 10, Sch 2. Am 1983 No 170, Sch 2 (1).
353 Persons offering stolen property
Every person to whom any property is offered to be sold, or pawned, or delivered, and who has reasonable cause to suspect that an offence has been committed with respect to such property, may, and if in his or her power is required, to apprehend and forthwith take before a Justice the person offering the same, together with such property, to be dealt with according to law.
353A Power to search person, make medical examination, take photograph, finger-prints etc
(1) Where a person is in lawful custody upon a charge of committing any crime or offence:(a) any constable, ormay search the person and take from the person anything found upon that search.(b) where the person in custody is female and no female constable is available to conduct the search—any female acting under and in accordance with the request of a constable,(1A) A search conducted by a person under and in accordance with a request made by a constable under subsection (1) (b) does not, if the search would be lawful if conducted by a constable, subject the person making the search personally to any action, liability, claim or demand whatever.(2) When a person is in lawful custody upon a charge of committing any crime or offence which is of such a nature and is alleged to have been committed under such circumstances that there are reasonable grounds for believing that an examination of his or her person will afford evidence as to the commission of the crime or offence, any legally qualified medical practitioner acting at the request of any officer of police of or above the rank of sergeant, and any person acting in good faith in his or her aid and under his or her direction, may make such an examination of the person so in custody as is reasonable in order to ascertain the facts which may afford such evidence.(3) When a person is in lawful custody for any offence punishable on indictment or summary conviction, the officer in charge of police at the station where the person is so in custody may take or cause to be taken all such particulars as may be deemed necessary for the identification of such person, including, where the person is of or above the age of 14 years, the person’s photograph and finger-prints and palm-prints.(3A) A person authorised by subsection (2) to make a medical examination of a person in lawful custody may take samples of the person’s blood, saliva and hair.(3B) Evidence concerning the samples may be given only in proceedings concerning the crime or offence in relation to which the samples were taken and the samples must be destroyed as soon as practicable after the conclusion of the proceedings and the exhaustion of any right of appeal concerning the crime or offence.(3C) A reference in this section to lawful custody is a reference to lawful custody of the police or any other authority. If a person is in lawful custody in a place other than a police station, the powers under this section of a constable or an officer of police may be exercised by the person in charge of the place or by another person who is normally supervised by that person.(3D) The consent of the person in lawful custody is not required for the doing of any thing under this section.(4) A court that finds an offence prescribed by or under subsection (7) to be proved against a person may order that the person present himself or herself in accordance with the terms of the order and submit to the taking, by the officer in charge of a police station specified in the order, of all such particulars as may be thought necessary for the identification of the person, including the person’s photograph, finger-prints and palm-prints. When making the order, the court is to warn the person that a failure to comply with the order may result in the person’s apprehension in accordance with subsection (6).(5) An order under subsection (4) may be made on the application of the prosecutor or on the court’s own motion, and may be made:(a) immediately after the person is sentenced, or(b) before the person is sentenced, if the court is satisfied that the making of such an order would assist in resolving doubt about the defendant’s identity.(6) At the direction of the officer in charge of the police station specified in an order under subsection (4), a person who does not present himself or herself in accordance with the terms of the order may be apprehended without warrant and taken into custody for such time as may be reasonably necessary for the taking of particulars in accordance with the order.(7) An order under subsection (4) may be made in respect of any of the following offences:(a) any indictable offence,(b) an offence under section 4 of the Traffic Act 1909 of driving a motor vehicle on a road or road related area (other than a road or road related area that is the subject of a declaration made under section 2A (1) (b) of that Act) negligently occasioning death, negligently occasioning grievous bodily harm, furiously or recklessly or at a speed or in a manner that is dangerous to the public,(c) an offence under section 4AA, section 4E (1D), (1E) (a) or (b), (1F) (a) or (b), (1G) (a) or (b) or (7), section 4F (7), section 5 (2) (a) or (b), section 5AC (2) or section 8 (2) of the Traffic Act 1909,(d) an offence prescribed, or of a kind or description prescribed, by the regulations.(8) (Repealed)s 353A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 13. Am 1951 No 31, sec 2 (z); 1983 No 10, Sch 3; 1982 No 81, Sch 1 (3) (rep); 1987 No 58, Sch 3; 1992 No 19, Sch 1 (1); 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [11]; 1997 No 85, Sch 1.2 [4]; 1997 No 115, Sch 4.4 [4]; 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [5].
353AA Photographing, finger-printing etc children under 14 years of age
(1) This section applies to a child under the age of 14 years who is in lawful custody for any offence punishable on indictment or summary conviction.(2) A person shall not take a photograph or the finger-prints or palm-prints of a child to whom this section applies except in accordance with this section. Nothing in this section, however, prevents the taking of any child’s photograph, finger-prints or palm-prints in accordance with the order of a court under section 353A (4).(3) A member of the police force of or above the rank of sergeant may, in respect of a child to whom this section applies, apply:(a) to the Children’s Court, orfor an order authorising, for the purpose only of identifying the child, the taking of the child’s photograph, finger-prints and palm-prints.(b) where it is not possible to apply to the Children’s Court within 72 hours after the taking of the child into custody, to a Justice,(4) The Children’s Court or a Justice, as the case may be, may hear an application under subsection (3) and may make the order sought in the application.(5) A child to whom this section applies shall not be held in custody for the purpose only of an application being made under subsection (3).s 353AA: Ins 1982 No 81, Sch 1 (4) (rep); 1987 No 58, Sch 3. Am 1992 No 19, Sch 1 (2).
353AB Destruction of certain photographs, finger-prints etc
(1) Where a court finds an offence alleged against a child who has had the child’s photograph, finger-prints and palm-prints taken in accordance with section 353A (3) or 353AA not proved, the court shall cause to be served on:(a) the child,(b) where practicable, the parents or guardian of the child, anda notice stating that if the child or they so desires or desire, the court will order that the photograph, finger-prints and palm-prints, and any other prescribed records (other than the records of the court), relating to the alleged offence be destroyed and the court may make the order accordingly.(c) any other person who has the care of the child,(2) In this section:prescribed records means records of the kind prescribed for the purposes of section 38 (1) of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987.s 353AB: Ins 1982 No 81, Sch 1 (4) (rep); 1987 No 58, Sch 3. Am 1987 No 273, Sch 1.
353AC Taking of finger-prints at court—pilot scheme
(1) A prescribed court that convicts a person of an offence that is punishable by imprisonment, or that finds such an offence to be proved against a person but does not proceed to conviction, must order that the person submit to the taking of his or her finger-prints before the person leaves the building in which the court is situated.(2) This section applies regardless of whether the court sentences the person to a term of imprisonment.(3) However, the court is not required to make an order under this section if it is satisfied that the person’s finger-prints were taken while the person was in lawful custody for the offence.(4) The finger-prints may be taken by a police officer, or by a person specified or described by the court in the order.(5) A police officer or person specified or described in the order may detain a person for such time as may be reasonably necessary to take the person’s finger-prints in accordance with the order.(6) This section does not prevent a court making an order in respect of a person under section 353A and does not affect any obligation to make an order under section 5AA of the Periodic Detention of Prisoners Act 1981.(7) In this section:imprisonment includes penal servitude.prescribed court means Parramatta Local Court, Dubbo Local Court and any other court prescribed by the regulations but does not include the Children’s Court or any court while it is exercising jurisdiction as the Children’s Court.(8) This section expires at the end of the period of 6 months commencing with the date on which this section commences. If an earlier expiry date is appointed by proclamation, this section expires at the end of the date so appointed.s 353AC: Ins 1996 No 112, Sch 1.
353B Person apprehended carrying razor etc
Where a person is in lawful custody upon a charge of committing any crime or offence and is found to have been carrying at the time or immediately before the person was apprehended any razor, razor blade or other cutting weapon, the person shall, unless the justice before whom the person is brought is satisfied that the person was carrying the same for a lawful purpose the proof of which shall lie upon the accused, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to a fine of 5 penalty units, or both.s 353B: Ins 1929 No 2, sec 16 (2). Am 1974 No 50, sec 7 (e); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (12); 1992 No 112, Sch 1.
353C Arrest by commander of aircraft
(1) The person in command of an aircraft may, on board the aircraft, with such assistance as is necessary, arrest without warrant a person whom he or she finds committing or reasonably suspects of having committed, or of having attempted to commit, an offence on or in relation to, or affecting the use of, an aircraft and that person in command or a person authorised by him or her for the purpose may hold the person so arrested in custody until he or she can be brought before a Justice or other proper authority to be dealt with according to law.(2) The person in command of an aircraft may, where he or she considers it necessary so to do in order to prevent an offence on or in relation to, or affecting the use of, the aircraft or to avoid danger to the safety of the aircraft or of persons on board the aircraft, with such assistance as he or she thinks necessary:(a) place a person who is on board the aircraft under restraint or in custody, or(b) if the aircraft is not in the course of a flight, remove a person from the aircraft.s 353C: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 2 (g).
Part 10A Detention after arrest for purposes of investigation
pt 10A, hdg: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
354 Objects of Part
The objects of this Part are:s 354, hdg: Rep 1985 No 38, Sch 1.(a) to provide for the period of time that a person who is under arrest may be detained by a police officer to enable the investigation of the person’s involvement in the commission of an offence, and(b) to authorise the detention of a person who is under arrest for such a period despite any requirement imposed by law to bring the person before a justice, Magistrate or court without delay or within a specified period, and(c) to provide for the rights of a person so detained.s 354: Am 1924 No 10, sec 14. Subst 1974 No 50, sec 7 (f). Am 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (1). Rep 1985 No 38, Sch 1. Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
355 Definitions
(1) In this Part:Aboriginal person means a person who:(a) is a member of the Aboriginal race of Australia, and(b) identifies as an Aboriginal, and(c) is accepted by the Aboriginal community as an Aboriginal.means:(a) a Magistrate, or(b) a justice of the peace who is a Clerk of a Local Court, or(c) a justice of the peace who is employed in the Attorney General’s Department and who is declared under the Search Warrants Act 1985 to be an authorised justice for the purposes of that Act.custody manager means the police officer having from time to time the responsibility for the care, control and safety of a person detained at a police station or other place of detention.detention warrant means a warrant issued under section 356G.investigation period means the period provided for by section 356D.permanent Australian resident means a person resident in Australia whose continued presence in Australia is not subject to any limitation as to time imposed by or in accordance with law.person of non-English speaking background means a person who is born in a country outside Australia and whose first language is not English.telephone includes radio, facsimile and any other communication device.Torres Strait Islander means a person who:(a) is a member of the Torres Strait Island race, and(b) identifies as a Torres Strait Islander, and(c) is accepted by the Torres Strait Island community as a Torres Strait Islander.(2) A reference in this Part to a person who is under arrest or a person who is arrested includes a reference to a person who is in the company of a police officer for the purpose of participating in an investigative procedure, if:(a) the police officer believes that there is sufficient evidence to establish that the person has committed an offence that is or is to be the subject of the investigation, or(b) the police officer would arrest the person if the person attempted to leave, or(c) the police officer has given the person reasonable grounds for believing that the person would not be allowed to leave if the person wished to do so.(3) A person is not taken to be under arrest because of subsection (2) merely because the police officer is exercising a power under a law to detain and search the person or to require the person to provide information or to answer questions.(4) For the purposes of this Part, a person ceases to be under arrest for an offence if the person is remanded by a justice, Magistrate or court in respect of the offence.s 355: Rep 1985 No 38, Sch 1. Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356 Persons to whom Part applies
(1) This Part applies to a person, including a person under the age of 18 years, who is under arrest by a police officer for an offence. It is immaterial whether the offence concerned was committed before or after the commencement of this Part or within or outside the State.(2) This Part does not apply to a person who is detained under the Intoxicated Persons Act 1979.s 356: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1974 No 50, sec 7 (g); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (13). Rep 1985 No 38, Sch 1. Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356A Modification of application of Part to certain persons
(1) The regulations may make provision for or with respect to the modification of the application of this Part to:(a) persons under the age of 18 years, or(b) Aboriginal persons or Torres Strait Islanders, or(c) persons of non-English speaking background, or(d) persons who have a disability (whether physical, intellectual or otherwise).(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the regulations may provide for an investigation period for a person or class of persons referred to in that subsection that is shorter than the period provided for by section 356D.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356B Effect of Part on other powers and duties
(1) Existing powers relating to arrest and other matters This Part does not:(a) confer any power to arrest a person, or to detain a person who has not been lawfully arrested, or(b) prevent a police officer from asking or causing a person to do a particular thing that the police officer is authorised by law to ask or cause the person to do (for example, the power to require a person to submit to a breath analysis under section 4E of the Traffic Act 1909), or(c) independently confer power to carry out an investigative procedure.(2) Certain evidentiary matters and rights not affected Nothing in this Part affects:(a) the operation of:(i) the following provisions of the Evidence Act 1995:• section 84 (Exclusion of admissions influenced by violence and certain other conduct)• section 85 (Criminal proceedings: reliability of admissions by defendants)• section 90 (Discretion to exclude admissions)• section 138 (Discretion to exclude improperly or illegally obtained evidence)• section 139 (Cautioning of persons), or(ii) any other provision of that Act, or(b) any law that permits or requires a person to be present at the questioning of another person who is under arrest (for example, the presence of a parent at the questioning by a police officer of the parent’s child), or(c) the right of a person to refuse to participate in any questioning of the person or any other investigative procedure unless the person is required by law to do so, or(d) the right of a person to leave police custody if the person is not under arrest, or(e) the rights of a person under the Bail Act 1978.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356C Detention after arrest for purposes of investigation
(1) A police officer may in accordance with this section detain a person, who is under arrest, for the investigation period provided for by section 356D.(2) A police officer may so detain a person for the purpose of investigating whether the person committed the offence for which the person is arrested.(3) If, while a person is so detained, the police officer forms a reasonable suspicion as to the person’s involvement in the commission of any other offence, the police officer may also investigate the person’s involvement in that other offence during the investigation period for the arrest. It is immaterial whether that other offence was committed before or after the commencement of this Part or within or outside the State.(4) The person must be:(a) released (whether unconditionally or on bail) within the investigation period, or(b) be brought before a justice, Magistrate or court within that period, or if it is not practicable to do so within that period, as soon as practicable after the end of that period.(5) A requirement in another Part of this Act, the Justices Act 1902, the Bail Act 1978 or any other relevant law that a person who is under arrest be taken before a justice, Magistrate or court, without delay, or within a specified period, is affected by this Part only to the extent that the extension of the period within which the person is to be brought before such a justice, Magistrate or court is authorised by this Part.(6) If a person is arrested more than once within any period of 48 hours, the investigation period for each arrest, other than the first, is reduced by so much of any earlier investigation period or periods as occurred within that 48 hour period.(7) The investigation period for an arrest (the earlier arrest) is not to reduce the investigation period for a later arrest if the later arrest relates to an offence that the person is suspected of having committed after the person was released, or taken before a justice, Magistrate or court, in respect of the earlier arrest.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356D Investigation period
(1) The investigation period is a period that begins when the person is arrested and ends at a time that is reasonable having regard to all the circumstances, but does not exceed the maximum investigation period.(2) The maximum investigation period is 4 hours or such longer period as the maximum investigation period may be extended to by a detention warrant.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356E Determining reasonable time
(1) In determining what is a reasonable time for the purposes of section 356D (1), all the relevant circumstances of the particular case must be taken into account.(2) Without limiting the relevant circumstances that must be taken into account, the following circumstances (if relevant) are to be taken into account:(a) the person’s age, physical capacity and condition and mental capacity and condition,(b) whether the presence of the person is necessary for the investigation,(c) the number, seriousness and complexity of the offences under investigation,(d) whether the person has indicated a willingness to make a statement or to answer any questions,(e) the time taken for police officers connected with the investigation (other than police officers whose particular knowledge of the investigation, or whose particular skills, are necessary to the investigation) to attend at the place where the person is being detained,(f) whether a police officer reasonably requires time to prepare for any questioning of the person,(g) the time required for facilities for conducting investigative procedures in which the person is to participate (other than facilities for complying with section 424A) to become available,(h) the number and availability of other persons who need to be questioned or from whom statements need to be obtained,(i) the need to visit the place where any offence concerned is believed to have been committed or any other place reasonably connected with the investigation of any such offence,(j) the time during which the person is in the company of a police officer before and after the person is arrested,(k) the time taken to complete any searches or other investigative procedures that are reasonably necessary to the investigation (including any search of the person or any other investigative procedure in which the person is to participate),(l) the time required to carry out any other activity that is reasonably necessary for the proper conduct of the investigation.(3) In any criminal proceedings in which the reasonableness of any period of time that a person was detained under this Part is at issue, the burden lies on the prosecution to prove on the balance of probabilities that the period of time was reasonable.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356F Certain times to be disregarded in calculating investigation period
(1) The following times (to the extent that those times are times during which any investigative procedure in which a person who is detained under this Part is to participate is reasonably suspended or deferred) are not to be taken into account in determining how much of an investigation period has elapsed:(a) any time that is reasonably required to convey the person from the place where the person is arrested to the nearest premises where facilities are available for conducting investigative procedures in which the person is to participate,(b) any time that is reasonably spent waiting for the arrival at the place where the person is being detained of police officers, or any other persons prescribed by the regulations, whose particular knowledge of the investigation, or whose particular skills, are necessary to the investigation,(c) any time that is reasonably spent waiting for facilities for complying with section 424A to become available,(d) any time that is required to allow the person (or someone else on the person’s behalf) to communicate with a friend, relative, guardian, independent person, legal practitioner or consular official,(e) any time that is required to allow such a friend, relative, guardian, independent person, legal practitioner or consular official to arrive at the place where the person is being detained,(f) any time that is required to allow the person to consult at the place where the person is being detained with such a friend, relative, guardian, independent person, legal practitioner or consular official,(g) any time that is required to arrange for and to allow the person to receive medical attention,(h) any time that is required to arrange for the services of an interpreter for the person and to allow the interpreter to arrive at the place where the person is being detained or become available by telephone for the person,(i) any time that is reasonably required to allow for an identification parade to be arranged and conducted,(j) any time that is required to allow the person to rest or receive refreshments or to give the person access to toilet and other facilities as referred to in section 356U,(k) any time that is required to allow the person to recover from the effects of intoxication due to alcohol or another drug (or both),(l) any time that is reasonably required to prepare, make and dispose of any application for a detention warrant or any application for a search warrant that relates to the investigation,(m) any time that is reasonably required to carry out charging procedures in respect of the person.(2) In any criminal proceedings in which the question of whether any particular time was a time that was not to be taken into account because of this section is at issue, the burden lies on the prosecution to prove on the balance of probabilities that the particular time was a time that was not to be taken into account.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356G Detention warrant to extend investigation period
(1) A police officer may, before the end of the investigation period, apply to an authorised justice for a warrant to extend the maximum investigation period beyond 4 hours.(2) The person to whom an application for a detention warrant relates, or the person’s legal representative, may make representations to the authorised justice about the application.(3) The authorised justice may issue a warrant that extends the maximum investigation period by up to 8 hours.(4) The maximum investigation period cannot be extended more than once.(5) An authorised justice must not issue a warrant to extend the maximum investigation period unless satisfied that:(a) the investigation is being conducted diligently and without delay, and(b) a further period of detention of the person to whom the application relates is reasonably necessary to complete the investigation, and(c) there is no reasonable alternative means of completing the investigation otherwise than by the continued detention of the person, and(d) circumstances exist in the matter that make it impracticable for the investigation to be completed within the 4-hour period.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356H Procedure for applying for and issuing detention warrant
(1) An application for a detention warrant may be made by the applicant in person or by telephone.(2) An application for a detention warrant made in person must be made in writing in the form prescribed by the regulations. The authorised justice must not issue the detention warrant unless the information given by the applicant in or in connection with the application is verified before the authorised justice on oath or affirmation or by affidavit. An authorised justice may administer an oath or affirmation or take an affidavit for the purposes of an application for a detention warrant.(3) An authorised justice must not issue a detention warrant on an application made by telephone unless satisfied that the warrant is required urgently and that it is not practicable for the application to be made in person. An application for a detention warrant made by telephone must be made by facsimile (instead of orally) if the facilities to do so are readily available for that purpose.(4) If it is not practicable for an application made by telephone to be made directly to an authorised justice, the application may be transmitted to the authorised justice by another person on behalf of the applicant.(5) An authorised justice who issues a detention warrant on an application made by telephone must:(a) complete and sign the warrant, and(b) furnish the warrant to the person who made the application or inform that person of the terms of the warrant and of the date and time when it was signed.(6) If a detention warrant is issued on an application made by telephone and the applicant was not furnished with the warrant, the applicant is to complete a form of detention warrant in the terms indicated by the authorised justice under subsection (5) and write on it the name of that authorised justice and the date and time when the warrant was signed. A form of detention warrant so completed is taken to be a detention warrant issued in accordance with this section.(7) A detention warrant issued on an application made by telephone is to be furnished by the authorised justice by transmitting it by facsimile, if the facilities to do so are readily available. The copy produced by that transmission is taken to be the original document.(8) As soon as practicable after a detention warrant is issued, the custody manager for the person to whom the warrant relates:(a) must give the person a copy of the warrant, and(b) must orally inform the person of the nature of the warrant and its effect.(9) In the case of an application for a detention warrant made by telephone, the applicant for the warrant must, within one day after the day on which the warrant is issued, give or transmit to the authorised justice concerned an affidavit setting out the information on which the application was based that was given to the authorised justice when the application was made.(10) In any criminal proceedings, the burden lies on the prosecution to prove on the balance of probabilities that the warrant was issued.(11) In this section, facsimile includes any electronic communication device that transmits information in a form from which written material is capable of being reproduced with or without the aid of any other device or article.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356I Information in application for detention warrant
(1) An authorised justice must not issue a detention warrant unless the application for the warrant includes the following information:(a) the nature of any offence under investigation,(b) the general nature of the evidence on which the person to whom the application relates was arrested,(c) what investigation has taken place and what further investigation is proposed,(d) the reasons for believing that the continued detention of the person is reasonably necessary to complete the investigation,(e) the extent to which the person is co-operating in the investigation,(f) if a previous application for the same, or substantially the same, warrant was refused, details of the previous application and of the refusal and any additional information required by section 356J,(g) any other information required by the regulations.(2) The applicant must provide (either orally or in writing) such further information as the authorised justice requires concerning the grounds on which the detention warrant is being sought.(3) Nothing in this section requires an applicant for a detention warrant to disclose the identity of a person from whom information was obtained if the applicant is satisfied that to do so might jeopardise the safety of any person.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356J Further application for detention warrant after refusal
If an application by a person for a detention warrant is refused by an authorised justice, that person (or any other person who is aware of the application) may not make a further application for the same, or substantially the same, warrant to that or any other authorised justice unless the further application provides additional information that justifies the making of the further application.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356K False or misleading information in applications
(1) A person must not, in or in connection with an application for a detention warrant, give information to an authorised justice that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.Maximum penalty: 100 penalty units or imprisonment for 2 years, or both.(2) This section applies to an application made by telephone as well as in person.(3) This section applies whether or not the information given is also verified on oath or affirmation or by affidavit.(4) Proceedings for an offence under this section are to be dealt with summarily before a Local Court constituted by a Magistrate sitting alone.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356L Provisions relating to detention warrants
(1) An authorised justice who issues a detention warrant is to cause a record to be made of all relevant particulars of the grounds the authorised justice has relied on to justify the issue of the warrant.(2) The regulations may make provision for or with respect to:(a) the keeping of records in connection with the issue and execution of detention warrants, and(b) the inspection of any such records, and(c) any other matter in connection with any such records.(3) Any matter that might disclose the identity of a person must not be recorded under this section if the authorised justice is satisfied that to do so might jeopardise the safety of any person.(4) A detention warrant must be in the form prescribed by the regulations.(5) A detention warrant is not invalidated by any defect other than a defect that affects the substance of the warrant in a material particular.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356M Custody manager to caution, and give summary of Part to, detained person
(1) As soon as practicable after a person who is detained under this Part comes into custody at a police station or other place of detention, the custody manager for the person must orally and in writing:(a) caution the person that the person does not have to say or do anything but that anything the person does say or do may be used in evidence, and(b) give the person a summary of the provisions of this Part that is to include reference to the fact that the maximum investigation period may be extended beyond 4 hours by application made to an authorised justice and that the person, or the person’s legal representative, may make representations to the authorised justice about the application.(2) The giving of a caution under subsection (1) (a) does not affect a requirement of any law that a person answer questions put by, or do things required by, a police officer.(3) After being given the information referred to in subsection (1) orally and in writing, the person is to be requested to sign an acknowledgment that the information has been so given.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356N Right to communicate with friend, relative, guardian or independent person and legal practitioner
(1) Before any investigative procedure in which a person who is detained under this Part is to participate starts, the custody manager for the person must inform the person orally and in writing that he or she may:(a) communicate, or attempt to communicate, with a friend, relative, guardian or independent person:(i) to inform that person of the detained person’s whereabouts, and(ii) if the detained person wishes to do so, to ask the person communicated with to attend at the place where the person is being detained to enable the detained person to consult with the person communicated with, and(b) communicate, or attempt to communicate, with a legal practitioner of the person’s choice and ask that legal practitioner to do either or both of the following:(i) attend at the place where the person is being detained to enable the person to consult with the legal practitioner,(ii) be present during any such investigative procedure.(2) If the person wishes to make any communication referred to in subsection (1), the custody manager must, as soon as practicable:(a) give the person reasonable facilities to enable the person to do so, and(b) allow the person to do so in circumstances in which, so far as is practicable, the communication will not be overheard.(3) The custody manager must defer for a reasonable period any investigative procedure in which the person is to participate:(a) to allow the person to make, or attempt to make, a communication referred to in subsection (1), and(b) if the person has asked any person so communicated with to attend at the place where the person is being detained:(i) to allow the person communicated with to arrive at that place, and(ii) to allow the person to consult with the person communicated with at that place.(4) If the person has asked a friend, relative, guardian or independent person communicated with to attend at the place where the person is being detained, the custody manager must allow the person to consult with the friend, relative, guardian or independent person in private and must provide reasonable facilities for that consultation.(5) If the person has asked a legal practitioner communicated with to attend at the place where the person is being detained, the custody manager must:(a) allow the person to consult with the legal practitioner in private and must provide reasonable facilities for that consultation, and(b) if the person has so requested, allow the legal practitioner to be present during any such investigative procedure and to give advice to the person.(6) Anything said by the legal practitioner during any such investigative procedure is to be recorded and form part of the formal record of the investigation.(7) An investigative procedure is not required to be deferred under subsection (3) (b) (i) for more than 2 hours to allow a friend, relative, guardian, independent person or legal practitioner that the person has communicated with to arrive at the place where the person is being detained.(8) An investigative procedure is not required to be deferred to allow the person to consult with a friend, relative, guardian, independent person or legal practitioner who does not arrive at the place where the person is being detained within 2 hours after the person communicated with the friend, relative, guardian, independent person or legal practitioner. This does not affect the requirement to allow a legal practitioner to be present during an investigative procedure and to give advice to the person.(9) The duties of a custody manager under this section owed to a person who is detained under this Part and who is not an Australian citizen or a permanent Australian resident are in addition to the duties of the custody manager owed to the person under section 356O.(10) After being informed orally and in writing of his or her rights under this section, the person is to be requested to sign an acknowledgment that he or she has been so informed.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356O Right of foreign national to communicate with consular official
(1) This section applies to a person who is detained under this Part and who is not an Australian citizen or a permanent Australian resident.(2) Before any investigative procedure in which a person to whom this section applies is to participate starts, the custody manager for the person must inform the person orally and in writing that he or she may:(a) communicate, or attempt to communicate, with a consular official of the country of which the person is a citizen, and(b) ask the consular official to attend at the place where the person is being detained to enable the person to consult with the consular official.(3) If the person wishes to communicate with such a consular official, the custody manager must, as soon as practicable:(a) give the person reasonable facilities to enable the person to do so, and(b) allow the person to do so in circumstances in which, so far as is practicable, the communication will not be overheard.(4) The custody manager must defer for a reasonable period any investigative procedure in which the person is to participate:(a) to allow the person to make, or attempt to make, the communication referred to in subsection (2), and(b) if the person has asked any consular official so communicated with to attend at the place where the person is being detained:(i) to allow the consular official to arrive at that place, and(ii) to allow the person to consult with the consular official.(5) If the person has asked a consular official communicated with to attend at the place where the person is being detained, the custody manager must allow the person to consult with the consular official in private and must provide reasonable facilities for that consultation.(6) An investigative procedure is not required to be deferred under subsection (4) (b) (i) for more than 2 hours to allow a consular official that the person has communicated with to arrive at the place where the person is being detained.(7) An investigative procedure is not required to be deferred to allow the person to consult with a consular official who does not arrive at the place where the person is being detained within 2 hours after the person communicated with the consular official.(8) After being informed orally and in writing of his or her rights under this section, the person is to be requested to sign an acknowledgment that he or she has been so informed.(9) This section does not apply if the custody manager did not know, and could not reasonably be expected to have known, that the person is not an Australian citizen or a permanent Australian resident.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356P Circumstances in which certain requirements need not be complied with
(1) A requirement imposed on a custody manager under section 356N relating to a friend, relative, guardian or independent person need not be complied with if the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that doing so is likely to result in:(a) an accomplice of the person who is detained under this Part avoiding arrest, or(b) the concealment, fabrication, destruction or loss of evidence or the intimidation of a witness, or(c) hindering the recovery of any person or property concerned in the offence under investigation, or(d) bodily injury being caused to any other person.(2) Further, in the case of a requirement that relates to the deferral of an investigative procedure, a requirement imposed on a custody manager under section 356N relating to a friend, relative, guardian or independent person need not be complied with if the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the investigation is so urgent, having regard to the safety of other persons, that the investigative procedure should not be deferred.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356Q Provision of information to friend, relative or guardian
(1) The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must inform the person orally of any request for information as to the whereabouts of the person made by a person who claims to be a friend, relative or guardian of the detained person.(2) The custody manager must provide, or arrange for the provision of, that information to the person who made the request unless:(a) the detained person does not agree to that information being provided, or(b) the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the person requesting the information is not a friend, relative or guardian of the detained person, or(c) the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that doing so is likely to result in:(i) an accomplice of the detained person avoiding arrest, or(ii) the concealment, fabrication, destruction or loss of evidence or the intimidation of a witness, or(iii) hindering the recovery of any person or property concerned in the offence under investigation, or(iv) bodily injury being caused to any other person.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356R Provision of information to certain other persons
(1) The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must inform the person orally of any request for information as to the whereabouts of the person made by a person who claims to be:(a) a legal practitioner representing the detained person, or(b) in the case of a detained person who is not an Australian citizen or a permanent Australian resident, a consular official of the country of which the detained person is a citizen, or(c) a person (other than a friend, relative or guardian of the detained person) who is in his or her professional capacity concerned with the welfare of the detained person.(2) The custody manager must provide, or arrange for the provision of, that information to the person who made the request unless:(a) the detained person does not agree to that information being provided, or(b) the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the person requesting the information is not the person who he or she claims to be.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356S Provision of interpreter
(1) The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must arrange for an interpreter to be present for the person in connection with any investigative procedure in which the person is to participate if the custody manager has reasonable grounds for believing that the person is unable:(a) because of inadequate knowledge of the English language, to communicate with reasonable fluency in English, or(b) because of any disability, to communicate with reasonable fluency.(2) The custody manager must ensure that any such investigative procedure is deferred until the interpreter arrives.(3) However, the custody manager need not:(a) arrange for an interpreter to be present if the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the difficulty of obtaining an interpreter makes compliance with the requirement not reasonably practicable, or(b) defer any such investigative procedure if the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the urgency of the investigation, having regard to the safety of other persons, makes such deferral unreasonable.(4) If an interpreter is not available to be present for the person in connection with any investigative procedure in which the person is to participate, the custody manager must instead arrange for a telephone interpreter for the person.(5) The custody manager must ensure that any such investigative procedure is deferred until a telephone interpreter is available.(6) However, the custody manager need not:(a) arrange for a telephone interpreter if the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the difficulty of obtaining such an interpreter makes compliance with the requirement not reasonably practicable, or(b) defer any such investigative procedure if the custody manager believes on reasonable grounds that the urgency of the investigation, having regard to the safety of other persons, makes such deferral unreasonable.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356T Right to medical assistance
The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must arrange immediately for the person to receive medical attention if it appears to the custody manager that the person requires medical attention or the person requests it on grounds that appear reasonable to the custody manager.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356U Right to reasonable refreshments and facilities
(1) The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must ensure that the person is provided with reasonable refreshments and reasonable access to toilet facilities.(2) The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must ensure that the person is provided with facilities to wash, shower or bathe and (if appropriate) to shave if:(a) it is reasonably practicable to provide access to such facilities, and(b) the custody manager is satisfied that the investigation will not be hindered by providing the person with such facilities.ss 356A–356U: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356V Custody records to be maintained
(1) The custody manager for a person who is detained under this Part must open a custody record in the form prescribed by the regulations for the person.(2) The custody manager must record the following particulars in the custody record for the person:(a) the date and time:(i) the person arrived at the police station or other place where the custody manager is located, and(ii) the person came into the custody manager’s custody,(b) the name and rank of the arresting officer and any accompanying officers,(c) the grounds for the person’s detention,(d) details of any property taken from the person,(e) if the person participates in any investigative procedure, the time the investigative procedure started and ended,(f) details of any period of time that is not to be taken into account under section 356F (Certain times to be disregarded in calculating investigation period),(g) if the person is denied any rights under this Part, the reason for the denial of those rights and the time when the person was denied those rights,(h) the date and time of, and reason for, the transfer of the person to the custody of another police officer,(i) details of any application for a detention warrant and the result of any such application,(j) if a detention warrant is issued in respect of the person, the date and time a copy of the warrant was given to the person and the person was informed of the nature of the warrant and its effect,(k) the date and time the person is released from detention,(l) any other particulars prescribed by the regulations.(3) The custody manager is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the custody record for the person and must ensure that the custody record (or a copy of it) accompanies the person if the person is transferred to another location for detention.(4) The recording of any matters referred to in this section must be made contemporaneously with the matter recorded in so far as it is practicable to do so.(5) As soon as practicable after the person is released or taken before a justice, Magistrate or court, the custody manager must ensure that a copy of the person’s custody record is given to the person.s 356V: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4]. Am 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [7].
356W Detention after arrest for purposes of investigation may count towards sentence
In passing sentence on a person convicted of an offence, a court may take into account any period during which the person was detained under this Part in respect of the offence and may reduce the sentence it would otherwise have passed.s 356W: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
356X Regulations
(1) (Repealed)(2) The regulations may make provision for or with respect to the following:(a) guidelines to be observed by police officers regarding the exercise or performance of powers, authorities, duties or functions conferred or imposed on police officers (including custody managers) by this Part,(b) police officers who may act as custody managers,(c) the keeping of records relating to persons who are detained under this Part, including the formal record of the conduct of investigative procedures in which such persons participate.s 356X: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4]. Am 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [8] [9].
356Y Review of Part
(1) The Minister is to review this Part to determine whether the policy objectives of the Part remain valid and whether the terms of the Part remain appropriate for securing those objectives.(2) The review is to be undertaken as soon as possible after the period of 12 months from the commencement of this Part.(3) A report on the outcome of the review is to be tabled in each House of Parliament within 12 months after the end of the period referred to in subsection (2).s 356Y: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [4].
Part 10B Powers of search, powers of entry and discharge of persons in custody
pt 10B, hdg: Ins 1997 No 48, Sch 1 [5].
Powers of search
357 Searching for and seizing firearms etc
(1) This section applies:(a) to any indictable offence, and(b) to an offence against section 545E, and(c) to an offence against the Prohibited Weapons Act 1989, the Firearms Act 1996 or a regulation made under either of those Acts.(2) If a member of the police force suspects, on reasonable grounds, that a dangerous article is being or has been used in the commission of an offence to which this section applies and that it is in the possession of any person in a public place or is in any vehicle, vessel, aircraft, package or receptacle which is in a public place and is in the possession or under the control of any person, the member may, without warrant:(a) detain and search the person and any such vehicle, vessel, aircraft, package or receptacle, and(b) seize and detain any dangerous article found as a result of the search.(3) A member of the police force who for the time being is lawfully in any premises may seize and detain any dangerous article which the member finds in those premises and in respect of which the member suspects, on reasonable grounds, that an offence to which this section applies is being or has been committed.(4) Where a member of the police force:(a) enters a dwelling-house in pursuance of an invitation (as referred to in section 357F) or in pursuance of a warrant granted under section 357G, for the purpose (in either case) of investigating whether an offence that the member of the police force suspects or believes to be a domestic violence offence has been committed or for the purpose of taking action to prevent the commission or further commission of such an offence, andthe member of the police force may search the dwelling-house for the firearm or spear gun and seize and detain the firearm or speargun.(b) has reasonable cause to believe:(i) that a firearm (within the meaning of the Firearms Act 1996) or a spear gun is in the dwelling-house, and(ii) that the firearm or spear gun has been or may be used to commit a domestic violence offence,(5) In this section:dangerous article means:(a) a firearm (within the meaning of the Firearms Act 1996) or a spare barrel for any such firearm, a prohibited weapon or prohibited article (within the meaning of the Prohibited Weapons Act 1989) or ammunition for any such firearm, prohibited weapon or prohibited article, or(b) a spear gun, or(c) an article or device, not being such a firearm, capable of discharging by any means:(i) any irritant matter in liquid, powder, gas or chemical form or any dense smoke, or(ii) any substance capable of causing bodily harm, or(d) a fuse capable of use with an explosive or a detonator, or(e) a detonator.premises means any building, structure, vehicle, vessel or aircraft and any place, whether built on or not.s 357: Subst 1974 No 50, sec 7 (h). Rep 1985 No 38, Sch 1. Ins 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (4). Am 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [2].
357A Powers of search
s 357A, hdg: Ins 1985 No 38, Sch 1.(1) Where any person reasonably suspects that an offence involving the safety of an aircraft has been, is being or may be committed on board or in relation to an aircraft and:(a) he or she is the commander of the aircraft, orhe or she may, subject to subsection (2), search the aircraft, any person on board, or about to board, the aircraft and any luggage or freight on board, or about to be placed on board, the aircraft.(b) a Justice, on the basis of that suspicion, authorises the person in writing so to do,(2) A female shall not be searched pursuant to subsection (1) except by a female.s 357A: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 2 (h).
357B Definitions
In sections 357C and 357D:police vessel means a vessel ordinarily used by members of the police force in the execution of their duty.vessel includes an undecked boat.ss 357B–357E: Ins 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (2).
357C Police may board vessels
A member of the police force of or above the rank of sergeant or in charge of a police station or police vessel may at any time with as many members of the police force as he or she thinks necessary:(a) enter into any part of any vessel,(b) search and inspect the vessel,(c) take all necessary measures for preventing injury on the vessel to persons or damage to property by fire or otherwise, and(d) take all necessary measures for preserving peace and good order on the vessel or for preventing, detecting or investigating any offences that may be, or may have been, committed on the vessel.ss 357B–357E: Ins 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (2).
357D Police may stop and detain vessels
A member of the police force of or above the rank of sergeant or in charge of a police station or police vessel, may, for the purposes of enabling any powers conferred on members of the police force by this Act or any other law to be exercised, stop and detain any vessel in which he or she reasonably suspects:(a) that an indictable offence has been or is about to be committed,(b) that there is a person who has committed an indictable offence or for whose arrest there is in force a warrant, or(c) that there is any thing stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained or any thing that has been used or is intended to be used in the commission of an indictable offence.ss 357B–357E: Ins 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (2).
357E Police may stop and search persons and vehicles
A member of the police force may stop, search and detain:(a) any person whom he or she reasonably suspects of having or conveying any thing stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained or any thing used or intended to be used in the commission of an indictable offence, or(b) any vehicle in which he or she reasonably suspects there is any thing stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained or any thing used or intended to be used in the commission of an indictable offence.ss 357B–357E: Ins 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (2).
Powers of entry and search in cases of child prostitution or pornography
357EA Police may enter and search
(1) A member of the police force may apply to an authorised justice for the issue of a search warrant if the member of the police force has reasonable grounds for believing that an offence against section 91D, 91E, 91F or 91G has recently been committed, is being committed or, within 72 hours, will be committed on or with respect to any premises.(2) An authorised justice to whom an application is made under subsection (1) may, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for doing so, issue a search warrant authorising any member of the police force:(a) to enter and search the premises concerned for evidence of an offence against section 91D, 91E, 91F or 91G, and(b) to make in the premises inquiries relating to such an offence, and(c) to seize any article that may be evidence of such an offence.(3) Part 3 of the Search Warrants Act 1985 applies to a search warrant issued under this section.(4) In this section: has the same meaning as in thes 357EA: Ins 1988 No 115, Sch 1 (4). Am 1991 No 92, Sch 2.
Powers of entry and search in relation to child pornography
357EB (Repealed)
s 357EB, hdg: Ins 1995 No 49, Sch 1 (4).
s 357EB: Ins 1995 No 49, Sch 1 (4). Rep 1995 No 63, Sch 2 (4).
Powers of entry in cases of domestic violence
357F Entry by invitation
(1) In this section, occupier, in relation to a dwelling-house, means a person immediately entitled to possession of the dwelling-house.(2) A member of the police force who believes on reasonable grounds that an offence has recently been or is being committed, or is imminent, or is likely to be committed, in any dwelling-house and that the offence is a domestic violence offence, may, subject to subsection (3):(a) enter the dwelling-house, andfor the purpose of investigating whether such an offence has been committed or, as the case may be, for the purpose of taking action to prevent the commission or further commission of such an offence, if invited to do so by a person who apparently resides in the dwelling-house, whether or not the person is an adult.(b) remain in the dwelling-house,(3) Except as provided in subsection (4), a member of the police force may not enter or remain in a dwelling-house by reason only of an invitation given as referred to in subsection (2) if authority to so enter or remain is expressly refused by an occupier of the dwelling-house and the member of the police force is not otherwise authorised (whether under this or any other Act or at common law) to so enter or remain.(4) The power of a member of the police force to enter or remain in a dwelling-house by reason of an invitation given as referred to in subsection (2) by the person whom the member of the police force believes to be the person upon whom a domestic violence offence has recently been or is being committed, or is imminent, or is likely to be committed in the dwelling-house may be exercised by the member of the police force notwithstanding that an occupier of the dwelling-house expressly refuses authority to the member of the police force to so enter or remain.s 357F: Ins 1982 No 116, Sch 2 (3).
357G Entry by radio/telephone warrant etc where entry denied
(1) In this section, a reference to:(a) a telephone includes a reference to a radio or any other communication device, and(b) a stipendiary magistrate includes a reference to a Justice employed in Local Courts Administration, Attorney General’s Department.(2) (Repealed)(3) Upon complaint made by a member of the police force to a stipendiary magistrate that:(a) the member of the police force has been denied entry to a specified dwelling-house, andthe stipendiary magistrate may, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for that suspicion or belief, by warrant, authorise and require the member of the police force to enter the dwelling-house and to investigate whether a domestic violence offence has been committed or, as the case may be, to take action to prevent the commission or further commission of a domestic violence offence.(b) the member of the police force suspects or believes that:(i) a domestic violence offence has recently been or is being committed, or is imminent, or is likely to be committed in the dwelling-house, and(ii) it is necessary for a member of the police force to enter the dwelling-house immediately in order to investigate whether a domestic violence offence has been committed or, as the case may be, to take action to prevent the commission or further commission of a domestic violence offence,(4) A complaint under this section may be made by a member of the police force to a stipendiary magistrate in person or by telephone and may be made directly to the stipendiary magistrate or, where, in all the circumstances, it is impracticable to make the complaint directly, by causing the complaint to be transmitted by another member of the police force by either of those means.(5) The fact that a complaint is made under this section to a stipendiary magistrate by a member of the police force who causes the complaint to be transmitted by another member of the police force to the stipendiary magistrate does not, if the stipendiary magistrate is of the opinion that it is, in all the circumstances, impracticable to communicate directly with the member of the police force making the complaint, prevent the stipendiary magistrate being satisfied as to the matters referred to in subsection (3).(6) A stipendiary magistrate grants a warrant under subsection (3) by stating the terms of the warrant.(7) Where a stipendiary magistrate grants a warrant under subsection (3), the stipendiary magistrate shall cause a record to be made in writing in a form prescribed by the regulations of:(a) the name of the member of the police force who was the complainant,(b) where the complaint was transmitted by a member of the police force on behalf of the complainant—the name of the member of the police force who so transmitted the complaint,(c) the details of the complaint, including the name of any person who is alleged to have informed the police as to the domestic violence the subject of the warrant and the grounds which the stipendiary magistrate was satisfied were reasonable grounds for the suspicion or belief by reason of which the warrant was granted,(d) the terms of the warrant (which shall include the address of the dwelling-house the subject of the warrant), and(e) the date and time the warrant was granted.(8) A warrant granted under subsection (3) shall be executed as soon as practicable after the warrant is granted and may be executed by day or night.(9) For the purpose of executing a warrant granted under subsection (3), a member of the police force may use force, whether by breaking open doors or otherwise, for the purpose of entering a dwelling-house.(10) A member of the police force may execute a warrant granted under subsection (3) with the aid of such assistants as the member of the police force deems necessary.(11) A warrant granted under subsection (3) is not invalidated by any defect, other than a defect which affects the substance of the warrant in a material particular.(12) Where a warrant has been granted under subsection (3) a record in triplicate in a form prescribed by the regulations shall be made containing the following details:(a) the address of the dwelling-house the subject of the warrant,(b) the name of the stipendiary magistrate who granted the warrant,(c) the name of the member of the police force who was the complainant authorised to enter the dwelling-house pursuant to the warrant,(d) the time at which the warrant was granted.(13) The copies of a record relating to a warrant and made as referred to in subsection (12) shall be dealt with as follows:(a) the first copy shall, upon entry into the dwelling-house the subject of the warrant or as soon as practicable thereafter, if a person who appears to reside in the dwelling-house and to be of or above the age of 18 years is present, be furnished to such a person together with a statement in a form prescribed by the regulations and containing a summary of the nature of the warrant and the powers given by the warrant,(b) the second and third copies shall be endorsed with:(i) the name of the person (if any) who informed the police as to the domestic violence the subject of the warrant, and(ii) a notation as to whether a dwelling-house was entered pursuant to the warrant and, if so, the time of entry and the action taken in the dwelling-house,(c) the second copy shall be forwarded to the director of the Magistrates Courts Administration or such other officer as may be prescribed for the purposes of this subsection by the regulations,(d) the third copy shall be retained by the member of the police force authorised to enter a dwelling-house pursuant to the warrant to be dealt with in such manner as may be prescribed by the regulations.(14) (Repealed)s 357G: Ins 1982 No 116, Sch 2 (3). Am 1985 No 38, Sch 1; 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [5] [6].
357H Provisions relating to powers of entry under sections 357F and 357G
(1) Where a member of the police force enters a dwelling-house in pursuance of an invitation (as referred to in section 357F), or in pursuance of a warrant granted under section 357G, for the purpose, in either case, of investigating whether an offence which the member of the police force suspects or believes to be a domestic violence offence has been committed, or, as the case may be, for the purpose of taking action to prevent the commission or further commission of such an offence, the member of the police force:(a) is to take only such action in the dwelling-house as is reasonably necessary:(i) to investigate whether such an offence has been committed,(ii) to render aid to any person who appears to be injured,(iii) to exercise any lawful power to arrest a person, and(iv) to prevent the commission or further commission of such an offence, and(a1) must inquire as to the presence of any firearms in the dwelling-house and, if informed that there is a firearm or firearms, must take all such action as is reasonably practicable to search for and to seize the firearm or firearms, and(b) is to remain in the dwelling-house only as long as is reasonably necessary to take that action.(2) Nothing in subsection (1) or in section 357F or 357G limits any other power which a member of the police force may have under this or any other Act or at common law to enter or remain in or on premises.s 357H: Ins 1982 No 116, Sch 2 (3). Am 1992 No 13, Sch 5 (3).
357I Police may enter and search for firearms
(1) If, on inquiry under section 357H (1) (a1), a member of the police force is informed that there is no firearm in the dwelling-house concerned but a member of the police force has reasonable cause to believe that there is a firearm or firearms in the dwelling-house, a member of the police force must apply to an authorised justice for the issue of a search warrant.(2) A member of the police force who believes on reasonable grounds that:(a) a domestic violence offence has recently been or is being committed, or is imminent, or is likely to be committed, otherwise than in a dwelling-house, andmust apply to an authorised justice for the issue of a search warrant.(b) any of the persons concerned may have a firearm in a dwelling-house,(3) An authorised justice to whom an application is made may, if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for doing so, issue a search warrant authorising any member of the police force:(a) to enter and search the dwelling-house concerned for firearms, and(b) to seize any firearms that may be found in the dwelling-house.(4) Part 3 of the Search Warrants Act 1985 applies to a search warrant issued under this section.(5) In this section, has the same meaning as in the Search Warrants Act 1985.s 357I: Ins 1992 No 13, Sch 5 (4).
Discharge of persons in custody
358 When case not to be proceeded with gaoler to discharge prisoner on certificate from Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions
(1) The Attorney-General or the Director of Public Prosecutions may, in respect of any person under committal for trial, and in all cases in which any person is remanded to prison, and in which he or she may in his or her discretion think fit not further to proceed, transmit at any time a certificate to the Judges of the Supreme Court, any one of whom may thereupon by warrant direct the gaoler in whose custody the prisoner, or person under remand, may be to discharge him or her from custody in respect of the offence mentioned in such warrant, and, if such gaoler neglects so to do, he or she shall be liable to a fine of 1 penalty unit, to be recovered in the name of the Attorney-General in any court of competent jurisdiction as a debt or liquidated demand.(2) In the case of a person under committal for trial, the certificate shall be in the Form No 1 in the Third Schedule, and the warrant in the Form No 2 in the said Schedule.(3) In the case of a person under remand, the certificate shall be in Form No 3, and the warrant in Form No 4 in the said Schedule.s 358: Am 1970 No 52, Second Sch; 1986 No 212, Sch 1; 1992 No 112, Sch 1.
Disposal of property in the custody of the police
358A (Repealed)
s 358A, hdg: Ins 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (3).
s 358A: Ins 1979 No 72, Sch 4 (3). Rep 1991 No 44, sec 4.
358B Disposal of seized firearms etc
(1) If a dangerous article is seized and detained under section 357, 357H or 357I, a Local Court constituted by a Magistrate sitting alone may, on application made by a person claiming to be entitled to possession of the article (being an application made at least 21 days after the seizure of the article), order that the article be returned to the person, unless:(a) a person has been charged with an offence in respect of the article, andor the article has been forfeited to the Crown under subsection (2).(b) the charge has not been withdrawn or finally determined by the person’s having been found not guilty of the offence,(2) Any such article shall, at the expiration of 90 days after seizure of the article, be forfeited to the Crown, unless, before the expiration of that period:(a) an order has been made under subsection (1) with respect to the article, or(b) a person has been found guilty (whether or not the person has been convicted) of an offence in respect of the article, and the court in which proceedings for the offence were taken, on the application of that or any other person, has otherwise ordered.(3) Despite subsections (1) and (2), if a firearm or spear gun is seized and detained under section 357 (4), 357H (1) (a1) or 357I, the Commissioner of Police shall cause the firearm or spear gun to be returned, when 21 days have expired after its seizure, to the person who was, when the firearm or speargun was seized, occupying or using the dwelling-house in which the firearm or spear gun was seized or to the person from whom the firearm or spear gun was seized unless:(a) the person is the subject of a firearms prohibition order under the Firearms Act 1996, or(b) possession of the firearm or spear gun by the person would otherwise constitute an offence, or(c) before those 21 days expire, a person has been charged with an offence in respect of the firearm or spear gun.(4) (Repealed)s 358B: Ins 1989 No 27, Sch 1 (5). Am 1992 No 13, Sch 5 (5); 1992 No 34, Sch 1; 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [2].
Offence relating to escaped prisoners
358C Harbouring escapee from another State or Territory
Any person who, in this State, knowingly harbours, maintains or employs a prisoner who has escaped from lawful custody in another State or a Territory is liable to penal servitude for 3 years.s 358C and hdg: Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
Part 11 Procedure, evidence, verdict, &c
As to indictment—form, venue, amendments, &c
359 Meaning of “Statute” and “Act” in indictments etc
In all indictments and informations, and all criminal pleadings and proceedings, the word Statute, and the word Act, used to indicate an enactment shall each include an Imperial Act as well as an Act.
360 What defects shall not vitiate an indictment
No indictment shall be held bad or insufficient for want of an averment of any matter unnecessary to be proved, or necessarily implied, nor for the omission of the words “as appears by the record”, or “with force and arms”, or “against the peace”, nor for the insertion or omission of the words “against the form of the statute”, nor for designating any person by a name of office, or other descriptive appellation, instead of the person’s proper name, nor for omitting to state the time at which the offence was committed, nor for stating the time wrongly, in any case where time is not of the essence of the offence, nor for stating the time imperfectly, nor for stating the offence to have been committed on a day subsequent to the finding of the indictment, or on an impossible day, or a day that never happened, nor for want of a proper or perfect venue, or a proper or formal conclusion, nor for the omission or improper insertion of the word “feloniously”, nor for want of or imperfection in any addition of the accused, nor for want of any statement of the value or price of any matter or thing, or the amount of damage, or injury, in any case where such value, or price, or amount, is not of the essence of the offence.
360A Indictment etc of corporations
(1) Every provision of an Act relating to offences punishable upon indictment or upon summary conviction may, unless a contrary intention appears, be construed to apply to bodies corporate as well as to individuals.(2) Where a corporation whether alone or jointly with some other person is charged before justices with an indictable offence, the justices may, if they are of opinion that the evidence is sufficient to put the accused corporation upon trial, make an order authorising an indictment to be filed for the offence named in the order or for such other offence as the Attorney-General or any other person authorised by law to prosecute indictable offences shall deem proper, and such order shall be deemed to be a committal for trial:Provided that:(a) where the offence is an offence which in the case of an adult may be dealt with summarily and the corporation does not appear by a representative or, if it does so appear, consents that the offence should be so dealt with, the offence may be dealt with summarily, and(b) if the corporation appears by a representative any answer to the question to be put under section 41 (4) of the Justices Act 1902 may be made on behalf of the corporation by that representative, but if the corporation does not so appear it shall not be necessary to put the question.(3) Where a bill is found against a corporation the corporation may on arraignment enter in writing by its representative a plea of guilty or not guilty. If no such plea is entered the court shall enter a plea of not guilty and the trial shall proceed as though the corporation had pleaded not guilty.(4) A representative need not be appointed under the seal of the corporation, and a written statement purporting to be signed by any person being one of the persons having the management of the affairs of the corporation to the effect that the person named has been appointed as the representative of the corporation shall be admissible as prima facie evidence that the person has been so appointed.(5) Any summons or other document may be served upon the corporation by leaving it at or sending it by post to the registered office of the corporation or to any place at which it trades or carries on business.(6) Where the penalty in respect of any offence is a term of imprisonment only, the court imposing punishment may, if it thinks fit, in the case of a body corporate, impose a pecuniary penalty not exceeding:(a) 2,000 penalty units if the court is constituted by a Judge of the Supreme Court or District Court, or(b) 100 penalty units if the court is not so constituted.(6A) In subsection (6), imprisonment includes penal servitude.(7) For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that for the purposes of this section indictable offence means an offence punishable on indictment at common law or under any Act or Imperial Act.s 360A: Ins 1951 No 31, sec 2 (aa). Am 1955 No 16, sec 4 (a); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (14); 1989 No 198, Sch 2 (1); 1990 No 108, Sch 1; 1992 No 112, Sch 1.
361 Venue in indictment
(1) New South Wales shall be a sufficient venue for all places, whether the indictment is in the Supreme Court or any other Court having criminal jurisdiction:Provided that some district or place, within, or at, or near which the offence is charged to have been committed, shall be mentioned in the body of the indictment.(2) Every such district or place shall be deemed to be in New South Wales, and within the jurisdiction of the Court unless the contrary is shown.
362 Formal objections when to be taken
Every objection to an indictment, for any formal defect apparent on the face thereof, shall be taken by demurrer or motion to quash such indictment before the jury are sworn, and every Court before which any such objection is taken may thereupon cause the indictment to be forthwith amended, and afterwards the trial shall proceed as if no such defect had appeared.
363 Judgment on demurrer to indictment
In all cases of felony and misdemeanour alike, the judgment against the accused on demurrer shall be that the accused “answer over” to the charge.
364 Traversing indictment
No traverse shall in any case be allowed, or trial postponed, or time to plead to the indictment given, unless the Court shall so order:Provided that where the Judge is of opinion that the accused ought to be allowed time, either to prepare for his or her defence, or otherwise, such Judge shall postpone the trial upon such terms as to him or her seems meet, and may respite the recognizances of the prosecutor and witnesses accordingly.
365 Orders for amendment of indictment, separate trial and postponement of trial
(1) Where, before trial, or at any stage of a trial, it appears to the court that the indictment is defective, the court shall make such order for the amendment of the indictment as the court thinks necessary to meet the circumstances of the case, unless, having regard to the merits of the case, the required amendments cannot be made without injustice.(2) Where, before trial, or at any stage of a trial, the court is of opinion that a person accused may be prejudiced or embarrassed in his or her defence by reason of being charged with more than one offence in the same indictment, or that for any other reason it is desirable to direct that the person should be tried separately for any one or more offences charged in an indictment, the court may order a separate trial of any count or counts of such indictment.(3) Where, before trial, or at any stage of a trial, the court is of opinion that the postponement of the trial of a person accused is expedient as a consequence of the exercise of any power of the court under this Act to amend an indictment or to order a separate trial of a count, the court shall make such order as appears necessary.(4) Where an order of the court is made under this section for a separate trial, or for the postponement of a trial:(a) if such an order is made during a trial, the court may order that the jury are to be discharged from giving a verdict on the count or counts the trial of which is postponed, or on the indictment as the case may be, and(b) the procedure on the separate trial of a count and the procedure on the postponed trial shall be the same in all respects (if the jury has been discharged), as if the trial had not commenced, and(c) the court may, subject to the Bail Act 1978, commit the accused person to prison or make such order as to the enlargement of recognizances and otherwise as the court thinks fit.(5) Any power of the court under this section shall be in addition to and not in derogation of any other power of the court for the same or similar purposes.s 365: Subst 1929 No 2, sec 10. Am 1978 No 166, Sch 1 (4).
366 Amended indictment
Where any indictment is amended, a note of the order for amendment shall be endorsed on the indictment, and the indictment in its amended form shall be treated as the indictment for the purposes of the trial, and for the purposes of all proceedings in connection therewith or consequent thereon.s 366: Subst 1929 No 2, sec 10.
367 Verdict and judgment valid after amendment
Every verdict, and judgment, given after the making of any amendment under this Act, shall be of the same force and effect, as if the indictment had originally been in the words, and form, in which it is after such amendment.
368 Form of record after amendment
If it is necessary at any time to draw up a formal record, in any case where an amendment has been made, such record may be drawn up in the words and form of the amended indictment, without noticing the fact of amendment.
369 Respiting recognizances on postponement
In all cases where the trial is postponed the Court may respite the recognizance of the prosecutor and witnesses requiring them severally to appear and prosecute, or give evidence, at the time and place to which the trial is so postponed.s 369: Am 1978 No 166, Sch 1 (5).
370 Separate offences when can be joined
In every case counts may be inserted in the same indictment, against the same person, for any number of distinct offences of the same kind, not exceeding three, committed against the same person:Provided that no more than six months have elapsed between the first and last of such offences:Provided further that nothing in this section shall affect the right of the Crown to insert alternative counts in any indictment describing the offence in different terms.s 370: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (a); 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (4).
371 Accessories may be charged together in one indictment
In every case of felony, at Common Law or by Statute, any number of accessories thereto, whether before or after the fact, may be charged with substantive felonies in the same indictment, and be tried together, although the principal felon is not included in such indictment, or is not in custody or amenable to justice.
372 Indictment charging previous offence also
In an indictment for an offence committed after a previous conviction for an offence, whether indictable or punishable on summary conviction, it shall be sufficient, after charging the subsequent offence, to state that the accused was theretofore at a certain time and place convicted of an indictable offence, or an offence punishable on summary conviction, as the case may be, without particularly describing such previous offence.
373 Description of partners etc
Whenever, in any indictment, it is necessary to mention, for any purpose, any partners, joint-tenants, parceners, or tenants in common, it shall be sufficient to describe them by naming one of such persons, and referring to the rest as “another”, or “others”, as the case may be.This provision shall extend to all joint stock companies, executors, administrators, and trustees.
374 Description of written instruments
In every case where a written, or printed, instrument, or instrument partly written and partly printed, is the subject of an indictment, or it is necessary to make an averment in an indictment respecting such instrument, it shall be sufficient to describe such instrument by any name or designation by which the same is usually known, or by the purport thereof, without setting out any copy thereof, or otherwise describing the same, and without stating the value thereof.
375 General averment of intent to defraud or injure
(1) In every case where it is necessary to allege an intent to defraud, or injure, it shall be sufficient to allege that the accused did the act with such intent, without alleging an intent to defraud, or injure, any particular person.(2) In an indictment for doing an act fraudulently, or for a fraudulent purpose, it shall not be necessary to state what was the fraudulent intent, or purpose.
376, 377 (Repealed)
s 376: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (bb).
s 377: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (bb).
378 Form of indictment against accessories to murder
In an indictment against an accessory to murder, or manslaughter, it shall be sufficient to charge the felony of the principal in the manner hereinbefore specified, and then to charge the accused as an accessory in the manner heretofore accustomed.
379–380 (Repealed)
s 379: Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (13).
s 379A: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 3 (b). Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (13).
s 379B: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 3 (b). Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (13).
s 380: Rep 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (13).
381 Indecent assault
In an indictment for an indecent assault it shall be sufficient to state that the accused did, on the day and at the place named, commit an indecent assault on the person alleged to have been assaulted, without stating the mode of such assault.
382 Where not necessary to lay property in any person
In an indictment in respect of any of the matters mentioned in the Fourth Schedule, it shall not be necessary to allege that the instrument, document, building, chattel, or other matter, or thing, in respect of which the offence was committed, is the property of any person.
383 Property of partners or joint owners
In an indictment wherein it is necessary to state the ownership of property belonging to more than one person, whether as partners in trade, joint-tenants, parceners, or tenants in common, it shall be sufficient to name one of such persons, and to allege such property to belong to the person so named, and another, or others as the case may be.This provision shall extend to all joint stock companies, executors, administrators, and trustees.
384 Stealing and receiving in one indictment
In an indictment containing a charge of feloniously stealing property, a count may be added, against the same person, for feloniously receiving the same, or any part thereof, knowing the same to have been stolen, and the prosecutor shall not be put to his or her election as to such charges.
385 Separate receivers may be charged in one indictment
Whenever any property has been stolen, taken, embezzled, obtained, or fraudulently applied, or disposed of, in such a manner as to amount to felony at Common Law or by Statute, any number of receivers at different times of such property, or of parts thereof, may be charged with substantive felonies in the same indictment, and be tried together, although the principal felon is not included in such indictment, or is not in custody or amenable to justice.
386 Allegations in indictment as to money or securities stolen
In an indictment for stealing, taking, receiving, or embezzling, or for the misappropriation, or fraudulent application, or disposal, of money, or any valuable security, or for the obtaining of money or any valuable security by any threat, or false pretence, or partly by a false pretence and partly by a wilfully false promise, it shall be sufficient to describe the property as a certain amount of money, or as a certain valuable security, without specifying any particular kind of money or security, which description shall be sustained by proof of the taking, receiving, embezzling, appropriating, disposal, or obtaining, of any money or valuable security, although some part of the value thereof was agreed to be, or was in fact, returned, and although, as it respects money, the particular kind of money is not proved, or provable.
387 Indictment for stealing by tenants
In every case of stealing any chattel let to be used in, or with, any house, or lodging, an indictment in the common form as for larceny, and in every case of stealing any fixture so let as aforesaid, an indictment in the same form as if the offender were not a tenant, or lodger, shall be sufficient, and in either case the property may be laid in the owner, or the person letting to hire.
388 Indictment for stealing deeds
In an indictment for stealing, embezzling, destroying, cancelling, obliterating, or concealing, any document of title to land, or any part thereof, it shall be sufficient to allege such document to contain evidence of the title to such land, and to mention the person, or one of the persons, having an interest in such land, or some part thereof.
389 Indictment for larceny by public servant, property to be laid in the Queen
In an indictment for larceny, or embezzlement, as a public servant, the property may be described as the property of Her Majesty, from whom it shall be deemed to have been stolen.
390 Description in indictment for engraving etc
In an indictment for engraving, or making the whole, or any part, of any instrument, or thing, or using, or having possession of any plate, or material upon which the whole, or any part, of any instrument or thing, is engraved, or made, or for having possession of paper upon which the whole, or any part, of any instrument, or thing, is made or printed, it shall be sufficient to describe such instrument, or thing, by any name or designation by which it is usually known, without setting out any copy of the same, or any part thereof.
391 Indictment for sale etc of counterfeit coin
In an indictment, under this Act, respecting the unlawful buying, or selling, of counterfeit coin, it shall not be necessary to allege at what rate, or for what price, the same was bought, sold, received, or paid, or put off, or offered so to be.
392 Indictment for perjury
In an indictment for perjury it shall be sufficient to allege that the accused on a certain day and at a certain place, before a person named, falsely swore, or falsely declared, or affirmed, the matter charged as false, stating the substance only of such matter, and averring that the same was so sworn, declared or affirmed, on an occasion when the truth of such matter was material, without specifying the occasion, or showing how the matter was material, or what was the cause or trial or inquiry, if any, pending, or the judicial, or official character of the person administering the oath, or taking the declaration, or affirmation, charged as false, and it shall be sufficient to state generally that the matter charged as having been falsely sworn was false in fact without negativing each assignment specifically.s 392: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (b).
393 Indictment for conspiracy
In an indictment for conspiracy, it shall not be necessary to state any overt act, and each defendant in any case of conspiracy, whether two or more defendants are included in the same indictment or not, may be charged separately, in any count, as having conspired with divers persons, of whom it shall be sufficient to name one only, or as having conspired with one other named person only, and may be convicted on such count upon proof of his or her having unlawfully conspired for the purpose therein alleged with any one such person:Provided always, that no more than three counts against the same defendant shall be inserted in any such indictment, and that the Court may, in any case before plea pleaded, order such particulars to be given, as to such Court shall seem meet, and that where conspiracies substantially different are charged in the same indictment, the prosecutor may be put to his or her election as to the one on which the prosecutor will proceed.
Arraignment, plea, and trial
394 Arraignment etc on charge of previous conviction
(1) No person shall be arraigned, in respect of any previous conviction charged in any indictment, unless the person is convicted of the subsequent offence charged therein.(2) Upon such conviction the person shall forthwith be arraigned, and the jury shall be charged as to such previous conviction, or convictions, and the trial shall proceed in respect thereof.
394A Conviction on indictment
Where a prisoner is arraigned on an indictment for any offence and can lawfully be convicted on such indictment of some other offence not charged in such indictment, the prisoner may plead not guilty of the offence charged in the indictment, but guilty of such other offence, and the Crown may elect to accept such plea of guilty or may require the trial to proceed upon the charge upon which the prisoner is arraigned.s 394A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 16.
395 Plea of “not guilty”
If any person arraigned on an indictment pleads thereto “not guilty”, the person shall, without further form, be deemed to have put himself or herself upon the country for trial, and the Court shall, in the usual manner, order a jury for his or her trial accordingly.
396 Refusal to plead
If any person being so arraigned stands mute, or will not answer directly to the indictment, the Court may order a plea of “not guilty” to be entered on behalf of such person, and the plea so entered shall have the same effect as if the person had actually pleaded the same.
397, 398 (Repealed)
s 397: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (bb).
s 398: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 2 (bb).
399 Plea of autrefois convict etc
(1) In any plea of autrefois convict, or of autrefois acquit, it shall be sufficient for the accused to allege that he or she has been lawfully convicted, or acquitted, as the case may be, of the offence charged in the indictment, without specifying the time or place of such previous conviction or acquittal.(2) If an accused pleads autrefois convict or autrefois acquit, a Judge, without the presence of a jury, is to decide the issue.s 399: Am 1997 No 85, Sch 1.2 [5].
399A Change to guilty plea during trial
(1) If the accused pleads guilty to an offence during a trial on indictment at any time after the accused has been given into the charge of a jury, and the Court accepts the plea, the Court is to discharge the jury from giving a verdict in the matter and is to find the accused guilty of the offence.(2) Such a finding has effect as if it were the verdict of the jury and the accused is liable to punishment accordingly.(3) This section extends to any proceedings on indictment commenced, but not concluded, before the commencement of this section.s 399A: Ins 1997 No 86, Sch 1 [1].
400 Practice as to entering the dock
In every case, whether of felony or misdemeanour, the presiding Judge shall have power to order the accused to enter the dock or usual place of arraignment, or to allow the accused to remain on the floor of the Court, and in either case to sit down, as such Judge shall see fit.s 400: Am 1974 No 18, Sch 1.
401 (Repealed)
s 401: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 3 (a).
402 Accused may be defended by counsel
Every accused person shall, in all Courts, be admitted to make full answer and defence by counsel.s 402: Am 1983 No 10, Sch 4 (1); 1997 No 86, Sch 1 [2].
403 Right to inspect depositions on trial
Every accused person shall be entitled on his or her trial to inspect, without fee or reward, all depositions taken against him or her and returned into, or which shall be in, the Court before which he or she is under trial.
404 (Repealed)
s 404: Am 1987 No 289, Sch 1 (1). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
404A Abolition of an accused’s right to make unsworn statement or to give unsworn evidence
(1) Any rule of law or procedure or practice permitting a person who is charged with the commission of a criminal offence to make an unsworn statement or to give unsworn evidence in answer to the charge is abolished.(2) Nothing in this section prevents a person from giving unsworn evidence under Part 6 of the Oaths Act 1900.s 404A: Ins 1994 No 26, Sch 1 (1).
405 Addresses to jury by accused
(1) Opening address on trial issues The accused or the accused’s counsel may address the jury immediately after the opening address of the prosecutor. Any such opening address is to be limited generally to an address on all or any of the matters disclosed in the opening address of the prosecutor that are or are not in dispute and the matters to be raised by the accused.(2) Opening address before evidence for accused If the accused intends to give evidence or to call any witness in support of the defence, the accused or the accused’s counsel is entitled to open the case for the defence before calling evidence, whether or not an address was made to the jury under subsection (1).(3) Closing address The accused or the accused’s counsel may address the jury after the close of the evidence for the defence and any evidence in reply by the Crown and after the prosecutor has made a closing address to the jury or declined to make a closing address to the jury.(4) Supplementary address by Crown If, in the closing address under subsection (3), relevant facts are asserted which are not supported by any evidence that is before the jury, the Court may grant leave for the Crown to make a supplementary address to the jury replying to any such assertion.s 405: Am 1951 No 31, sec 3 (b); 1983 No 10, Sch 4 (2); 1994 No 26, Sch 1 (2). Subst 1997 No 86, Sch 1 [3].
405AA Summary by Judge
(1) A Judge of the Supreme Court or District Court need not summarise, at the end of a criminal trial before a jury, the evidence given in the trial if the Judge is of the opinion that, in all the circumstances of the trial, the summary is not necessary.(2) This section applies despite any rule of law or practice to the contrary.(3) Nothing in this section affects any aspect of a Judge’s summing up function other than the summary of evidence in a trial.(4) This section extends to trials commenced, but not concluded, before the commencement of this section.s 405AA: Ins 1990 No 74, Sch 2.
405A Notice of alibi
(1) On a trial on indictment the defendant shall not without the leave of the Court adduce evidence in support of an alibi unless, before the end of the prescribed period, he or she gives notice of particulars of the alibi.(2) Without prejudice to subsection (1), on a trial on indictment the defendant shall not without the leave of the Court call any other person to give evidence in support of an alibi unless:(a) the notice under that subsection includes the name and address of the person, or, if the name or address is not known to the defendant at the time he or she gives the notice, any information in his or her possession which might be of material assistance in finding the person,(b) if the name or the address is not included in the notice, the Court is satisfied that the defendant before giving the notice took, and thereafter continued to take, all reasonable steps to secure that the name or the address would be ascertained,(c) if the name or the address is not included in the notice, but the defendant subsequently discovers the name or address or receives other information which might be of material assistance in finding the person, he or she forthwith gives notice of the name, address or other information, as the case may be, and(d) if the defendant is notified by or on behalf of the Crown that the person has not been traced by the name or at the address given by the defendant, he or she forthwith gives notice of any information which might be of material assistance in finding the person and which is then in his or her possession or, on subsequently receiving any such information, forthwith gives notice of it.(3) The Court shall not refuse leave under this section if it appears to the Court that on the committal for trial of the defendant he or she was not informed by the committing justice of the requirements of subsections (1), (2) and (5), and the statement in writing of the committing justice that the defendant was so informed shall be evidence that the defendant was so informed.(4) Any evidence tendered to disprove an alibi may, subject to any direction by the Court, be given before or after evidence is given in support of the alibi.(5) Any notice purporting to be given under this section on behalf of the defendant by his or her solicitor shall, unless the contrary is proved, be deemed to be given with the authority of the defendant.(6) A notice under this section shall be given in writing to the Director of Public Prosecutions, and may be given by delivering it to the Director, or by leaving it at his or her office, or by sending it in a registered letter or by certified mail addressed to him or her at his or her office.(7) In this section:evidence in support of an alibi means evidence tending to show that by reason of the presence of the defendant at a particular place or in a particular area at a particular time he or she was not, or was unlikely to have been, at the place where the offence is alleged to have been committed at the time of its alleged commission.the prescribed period means the period of ten days commencing at the time of the committal of the defendant for trial.s 405A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 8 (a). Am 1986 No 212, Sch 1; 1994 No 26, Sch 1 (3).
405AB Notice of intention to adduce evidence of substantial impairment
(1) On a trial for murder, the defendant must not, without the leave of the Court, adduce evidence tending to prove a contention by the defendant that the defendant is not liable to be convicted of murder by virtue of section 23A, unless the defendant gives notice, as prescribed by the regulations, of his or her intention to raise that contention.(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the defendant must not, without the leave of the Court, call any other person to give evidence tending to prove a contention by the defendant that the defendant is not liable to be convicted of murder by virtue of section 23A unless the notice under this section includes:(a) the name and address of the other person, and(b) particulars of the evidence to be given by the other person.(3) Any evidence tendered to disprove a contention that the defendant is not liable to be convicted of murder by virtue of section 23A may, subject to any direction of the Court, be given before or after evidence is given to prove that contention.(4) Any notice purporting to be given under this section on behalf of the defendant by his or her legal practitioner is taken, unless the contrary is proved, to have been given with the authority of the defendant.(5) A notice under this section is to be given in writing to the Director of Public Prosecutions, and may be given by delivering it to the Director, or by leaving it at the office of the Director or by sending it in a registered letter or certified mail addressed to the Director at the office of the Director.s 405AB: Ins 1997 No 106, Sch 1 [2].
405B Warning to be given by Judge in relation to lack of complaint in certain sexual offence proceedings
(1) (Repealed)(2) Where on the trial of a person for a prescribed sexual offence evidence is given or a question is asked of a witness which tends to suggest an absence of complaint in respect of the commission of the alleged offence by the person upon whom the offence is alleged to have been committed or to suggest delay by that person in making any such complaint, the Judge shall:(a) give a warning to the jury to the effect that absence of complaint or delay in complaining does not necessarily indicate that the allegation that the offence was committed is false, and(b) inform the jury that there may be good reasons why a victim of a sexual assault may hesitate in making, or may refrain from making, a complaint about the assault.s 405B: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (14). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 1 (3); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (7); 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (4).
405C Definitions relating to children’s evidence
In sections 405CA–405I:apprehended violence order means an apprehended violence order made under Part 15A and includes an interim apprehended violence order made under that Part.child, in relation to any proceedings, means a child under the age of 16 years at the time that the child is giving evidence in the proceedings.personal assault offence means any of the following offences:(a) an offence under Part 3 (Offences against the person),(b) an offence under section 562AB (Stalking, intimidation with intent to cause fear for personal safety),(c) an offence under section 562I (Offence of contravening an apprehended violence order),(d) an offence under section 25 (Child abuse) of the Children (Care and Protection) Act 1987,(e) an offence which includes the commission, or an intention to commit, any of the above offences,(f) an offence of attempting, or of conspiracy or incitement, to commit any of the above offences.tribunal, in respect of proceedings before the Victims Compensation Tribunal, means that Tribunal.s 405C: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (14). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 1 (4); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (8); 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (5). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1. Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [1].
405CA Children have a right to the presence of a supportive person while giving evidence
(1) This section applies to:(a) all criminal proceedings in any court, and(b) civil proceedings arising from the commission of a personal assault offence, and(c) proceedings before the Victims Compensation Tribunal arising from the commission of a personal assault offence.(2) A child who gives evidence in any such proceedings is entitled to choose a person whom the child would like to have present near him or her when giving evidence.(3) Without limiting a child’s right to choose such a person, that person:(a) may be a parent, guardian, relative, friend or support person of the child, and(b) may be with the child as an interpreter, for the purpose of assisting the child with any difficulty in giving evidence associated with a disability, or for the purpose of providing the child with other support.(4) To the extent that the court or tribunal considers it reasonable to do so, the court or tribunal must make whatever direction is appropriate to give effect to a child’s decision to have such a person present near the child, and within the child’s sight, when the child is giving evidence.(5) The court or tribunal may permit more than one support person to be present with the child if the court or tribunal thinks that it is in the interests of justice to do so.(6) Nothing in this section limits any discretion that a court or tribunal has with respect to the conduct of proceedings in any case.(7) This section extends to a child who is the accused or the defendant in the relevant proceedings.s 405CA: Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [1].
405D Children have a right to give evidence by closed-circuit television
(1) This section applies to:(a) proceedings in which it is alleged that a person has committed a personal assault offence, and(b) proceedings in relation to a complaint for an apprehended violence order, and(c) civil proceedings arising from the commission of a personal assault offence, and(d) proceedings before the Victims Compensation Tribunal arising from the commission of a personal assault offence.(2) Subject to this Act, a child who gives evidence in any such proceedings is entitled to give that evidence by means of closed-circuit television facilities or by means of any other similar technology prescribed for the purposes of this section.(3) A child may choose not to give evidence by those means.(4) A child must not give evidence by means of closed-circuit television facilities or any other prescribed technology if the court or tribunal orders that such means not be used.(5) The court or tribunal may only make such an order if it is satisfied that it is not in the interests of justice for the child’s evidence to be given by such means or that the urgency of the matter makes their use inappropriate.(6) The court or tribunal may make, vary or revoke an order under this section either of its own motion or on application by a party to the proceedings.(7) This section does not apply to a child:(a) who is the accused or defendant in any of the proceedings referred to in subsection (1) (a), (b) or (c), or(b) who is or was accused of committing the offence that gave rise to proceedings referred to in subsection (1) (d).(8) (Repealed)(9) Nothing in this section affects the operation of section 13 of the Evidence Act 1995.s 405D: Ins 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (2). Am 1991 No 17, Sch 1. Subst 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [2]. Am 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [5].
405DA Accused children may be allowed to give evidence by closed-circuit television
(1) This section applies to a child in any of the following proceedings:(a) proceedings in which it is alleged that the child has committed a personal assault offence, and(b) proceedings in relation to a complaint for an apprehended violence order against the child, and(c) civil proceedings arising from the commission of a personal assault offence by the child, and(d) proceedings before the Victim’s Compensation Tribunal arising from the commission of a personal assault offence by the child.(2) The court or tribunal may make an order permitting a child’s evidence to be given by means of closed-circuit television or any other similar technology prescribed for the purposes of this section.(3) Such an order may be made only if the court or tribunal is satisfied:(a) that the child may suffer mental or emotional harm if required to give evidence in the ordinary way, or(b) that the facts may be better ascertained if the child’s evidence is given in accordance with such an order.(4) A child may choose not to give evidence by means of closed-circuit television facilities or other similar technology.(5) The court or tribunal may make, vary or revoke an order under this section either of its own motion or on application by a party to the proceedings.(6) (Repealed)s 405DA: Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [2]. Am 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [5].
405DB Giving evidence by closed-circuit television
(1) If a child’s evidence is given from a location outside a court, or outside a place at which a tribunal is sitting, (by virtue of section 405D or 405DA), that location is taken to be part of the court in which the proceedings are being held, or part of the place in which the tribunal is sitting.(2) If a child’s evidence is given from a location outside a court, or outside a place at which a tribunal is sitting, (by virtue of section 405D or 405DA), the court or tribunal may order:(a) that a court officer, or an officer of the tribunal, be present at that other location, and(b) that any other person be present with the child as an interpreter, for the purpose of assisting the child with any difficulty in giving evidence associated with a disability, or for the purpose of providing the child with other support.(3) Any such order does not limit the entitlement that a child has (under section 405CA) to choose another person to be present with him or her when giving evidence.(4) The court or tribunal may make, vary or revoke an order under this section either of its own motion or on application by a party to the proceedings or by the relevant child.ss 405DB–405DD: Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [2].
405DC Giving identification evidence when closed-circuit television is used
(1) If a child is entitled to give evidence by means of closed-circuit television facilities, or any other similar technology, that child may not give identification evidence by those means.(2) However, such a child is entitled to refuse to give identification evidence until after the completion of the child’s other evidence (including examination in chief, cross-examination and re-examination).(3) In addition, the court must ensure that such a child is not in the presence of the accused for any longer than is necessary for the child to give identification evidence.(4) In this section:identification evidence has the same meaning as in the Evidence Act 1995.ss 405DB–405DD: Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [2].
405DD Proceedings may be moved to allow use of closed-circuit television facilities
(1) This section applies if a child is entitled to give evidence by means of closed-circuit television facilities or any other similar technology (by virtue of section 405D or an order made under section 405DA).(2) If the court, or place at which the tribunal is sitting, is not equipped with such facilities or technology, or it otherwise considers it appropriate to do so, the court or tribunal may adjourn the proceedings or any part of the proceedings to a court or place that is equipped with such facilities or technology so that the child’s evidence may be given by such means.ss 405DB–405DD: Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [2].
405E Use of closed-circuit television or similar technology
(1) Closed-circuit television facilities or similar technology used for the giving of evidence by a child are to be operated in such a manner that the persons who have an interest in the proceedings are able to see the child (and any person present with the child) on the same or another television monitor.(2) The regulations may make provision for or with respect to the use of closed-circuit television facilities or similar technology for the giving of evidence by children in accordance with this Act.(3) Rules of court may (subject to the regulations) also make provision for or with respect to the use of closed-circuit television facilities or similar technology for the giving of evidence by children in accordance with this Act.s 405E: Ins 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (2). Am 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [3] [4]; 1998 No 54, Sch 2.6 [10].
405F Children have a right to alternative arrangements for giving evidence when closed-circuit television facilities not available
(1) This section applies to proceedings in which a child is entitled to give evidence by means of closed-circuit television facilities or other similar technology (by virtue of section 405D or an order made under section 405DA) but does not do so because:(a) such facilities and such technology are not available (and the court or tribunal does not move the proceedings under section 405DD), or(b) the child chooses not to give evidence by those means, or(c) the court or tribunal orders that the child may not give evidence by those means (or, in the case of a child to whom section 405DA applies, the court or tribunal does not order that the child may give evidence by those means).(2) In such proceedings, the court or tribunal must make alternative arrangements for the giving of evidence by the child, in order to restrict contact (including visual contact) between the child and any other person or persons.(3) Those alternative arrangements may include any of the following:(a) the use of screens,(b) planned seating arrangements for people who have an interest in the proceedings (including the level at which they are seated and the people in the child’s line of vision),(c) the adjournment of the proceedings or any part of the proceedings to other premises.(4) A child may choose not to use any such alternative arrangements. In that case, the court or tribunal must direct that the child be permitted to give evidence in the ordinary way.(5) Any premises to which proceedings are adjourned for this purpose are taken to be part of the court or tribunal in which the proceedings are being heard.s 405F: Ins 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (2). Am 1991 No 17, Sch 1. Subst 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [5].
405FA Children have a right to alternative arrangements for giving evidence when the accused is unrepresented
(1) This section applies to the following proceedings, if the accused or defendant is not represented by a legal practitioner:(a) all criminal proceedings in any court,(b) civil proceedings arising from the commission of a personal assault offence.(2) In such proceedings, the court may appoint a person to conduct the examination in chief, cross-examination, or re-examination of any witness (other than the accused or the defendant) who is a child.(3) If any such person is appointed, that person must act on the instructions of the accused or the defendant.(4) The court may choose not to appoint such a person if the court considers that it is not in the interests of justice to do so.(5) This section applies whether or not closed-circuit television facilities or similar technology is used to give evidence, and whether or not alternative arrangements under section 405F are used in the proceedings.s 405FA: Ins 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [5].
405G (Repealed)
s 405G: Ins 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1991 No 17, Sch 1.
405H Warning to jury
(1) In any criminal proceedings in which the evidence of a child is given by means of closed-circuit television facilities or any other similar technology (by virtue of section 405D), the Judge must:(a) inform the jury that it is standard procedure for children’s evidence in such cases to be given by those means, and(b) warn the jury not to draw any inference adverse to the accused person or give the evidence any greater or lesser weight because of the use of those facilities or that technology.(2) In any criminal proceedings in which the evidence of a child is given by means of closed-circuit television facilities or any other similar technology (by virtue of section 405DA), the Judge must warn the jury not to draw any inference adverse to the accused person or give the evidence any greater or lesser weight because of the use of those facilities or that technology.(3) In any criminal proceedings in which arrangements are made for a person to be with a child giving evidence (by virtue of section 405CA or 405DB), the Judge must:(a) inform the jury that it is standard procedure in such cases for children to choose a person to be with them, and(b) warn the jury not to draw any inference adverse to the accused person or give the evidence any greater or lesser weight because of the presence of that person.(4) In any criminal proceedings in which alternative arrangements for the giving of evidence by a child are made (by virtue of section 405F and 405FA), the Judge must:(a) inform the jury that it is standard procedure in such cases for alternative arrangements to be used when children give evidence, and(b) warn the jury not to draw any inference adverse to the accused person or give the evidence any greater or lesser weight because of the use of those alternative arrangements.s 405H: Ins 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (2). Am 1990 No 108, Sch 1. Subst 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [6].
405I Validity of proceedings not affected
The failure of a child to give evidence in accordance with section 405CA, 405D, 405DA, 405DB, 405DC, 405F or 405FA does not affect the validity of the proceedings or any decision made in connection with those proceedings.s 405I: Ins 1990 No 49, Sch 1 (2). Am 1996 No 68, Sch 1 [7].
Rules respecting evidence
406 Depositions by persons dangerously ill—how to be taken and when admissible in evidence
(1) Whenever by the representation of any credible person on oath, or in case of urgency without oath, it is made to appear to any Justice that a person, able to give material information respecting an indictable offence, is dangerously ill, whereby his or her evidence will probably be lost if not forthwith taken, such Justice may take the deposition of the person so in danger, touching such offence, in like manner as if a prosecution for the same were then pending before such Justice, and transmit the same to the Attorney-General. And if afterwards, on the trial of any person for the offence to which the deposition relates, or for the murder or manslaughter of the deponent, in case of his or her death or alleged death by reason of such offence, it is proved to the satisfaction of the Judge that the witness is dead, or unable from illness to attend the trial, or to give evidence, his or her deposition may be read in evidence for or against the accused, although not taken in the presence or hearing either of the party prosecuting or of such accused person:Provided always that:(1) Every such deposition shall be in the form, or substantially in the form, contained in the Fifth Schedule, and shall be subscribed by the Justice taking the same, of which fact, and that, such deposition was duly taken by him or her under this section, the deposition itself, if purporting to be signed by such Justice, shall be sufficient proof.(2) A copy of every such deposition shall be delivered to every person whom the same may affect criminally, as soon after the taking thereof as shall be practicable.(3) If practicable, every such person shall, before being committed or placed on his or her trial, have full opportunity afforded him or her, if he or she thinks fit, for the cross-examination of any such deponent, for which purpose any Judge or magistrate may, by any order or orders in writing, cause any person in custody to be conveyed to any place mentioned in any such order, and afterwards to be returned to that custody.(2) A copy of the deposition shall be forwarded by the Attorney General to the Director of Public Prosecutions.s 406: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (c); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (15); 1986 No 212, Sch 1.
407 (Repealed)
s 407: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (d); 1926 No 4, sec 2; 1974 No 50, sec 8 (b); 1982 No 116, Sch 1 (2); 1988 No 92, Sch 26. Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
407AA Compellability of spouses to give evidence in certain proceedings
(1) In this section:(a) a reference to the husband or wife of an accused person includes a reference to a person living with the accused person as the husband or wife of the accused person on a bona fide domestic basis although not married to the accused person,(b) a reference to a domestic violence offence committed upon the husband or wife of an accused person includes a reference to an offence of contravening a prohibition or restriction specified in an apprehended violence order under Part 15A which was made against the accused person and in respect of which the husband or wife was the protected person,(c) a reference to a child assault offence is a reference to:(i) an offence under, or mentioned in, section 19, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 33A, 35, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 58, 59, 61, 61B, 61C, 61D, 61E, 61I, 61J, 61K, 61L, 61M, 61N, 61O, 66A, 66B, 66C, 66D, 80A, 493 or 494 committed upon a child under the age of 18 years, or(ii) an offence of attempting, or of conspiracy or incitement, to commit an offence referred to in subparagraph (i), and(d) a reference to a child assault offence committed upon a child includes a reference to an offence of contravening a prohibition or restriction specified in an apprehended violence order under Part 15A which was made against the accused person and in respect of which that child was the protected person.(2) Except as provided in subsection (3), the husband or wife of an accused person in a criminal proceeding shall, where the offence charged is a domestic violence offence (other than an offence constituted by a negligent act or omission) committed upon that husband or wife, be compellable to give evidence in the proceeding in every Court, either for the prosecution or for the defence, and without the consent of the accused person.(2A) Except as provided in subsection (3), the husband or wife of an accused person in a criminal proceeding shall, where the offence charged is a child assault offence (other than an offence constituted by a negligent act or omission) committed upon:(a) a child living in the household of the accused person, orbe compellable to give evidence in the proceeding in every Court, either for the prosecution or for the defence, and without the consent of the accused person.(b) a child who, although not living in the household of the accused person, is a child of the accused person and that husband or wife,(3) The husband or wife of an accused person shall not be compellable to give evidence for the prosecution as referred to in subsection (2) or (2A) if that husband or wife has applied to, and been excused by, the Judge or Justice.(4) A Judge or Justice may excuse the husband or wife of an accused person from giving evidence for the prosecution as referred to in subsection (2) or (2A) if satisfied that the application to be excused is made by that husband or wife freely and independently of threat or any other improper influence by any person and that:(a) it is relatively unimportant to the case to establish the facts in relation to which it appears that that husband or wife is to be asked to give evidence or there is other evidence available to establish those facts, and(b) the offence with which the accused person is charged is of a minor nature.(5) A Judge or Justice shall, when excusing the husband or wife of an accused person from giving evidence under subsection (4), state the reasons for so doing and cause those reasons to be recorded in writing in a form prescribed by the regulations.(6) An application under this section by the husband or wife of an accused person to be excused from giving evidence shall be made and determined in the absence of the jury (if any) and the accused person but in the presence of the legal representative (if any) of the accused person.(7) A Judge or Justice may conduct the hearing of an application under this section in any manner thought fit and is not bound to observe rules of law governing the admission of evidence but may obtain information on any matter in any manner thought fit.(8) The fact that the husband or wife of an accused person in a criminal proceeding has applied under this section to be excused, or has been excused, from giving evidence in the proceeding shall not be made the subject of any comment by the Judge or by any party in the proceeding.(9) (Repealed)s 407AA: Ins 1982 No 116, Sch 1 (3). Am 1985 No 149, Sch 1 (5); 1987 No 184, Sch 1 (3); 1989 No 62, Sch 1 (3); 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (8); 1995 No 99, Sch 2.4 [1]; 1997 No 135, Sch 1 [5] [7].
407A Abolition of presumption of coercion of wife by husband
(1) Any presumption of law that an offence committed by a wife in the presence of her husband is committed under the coercion of the husband is hereby abolished.(2) This section shall come into operation as from the date of the passing of the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1924.s 407A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 17.
408 (Repealed)
s 408: Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
409 Depositions may be read as evidence for prosecution etc
(1) A deposition of a witness may be read as evidence for the prosecution at the trial of the accused upon proof:(a) on oath that the witness is dead, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence without a risk of endangering the life of the witness, or is absent from Australia, and(b)(i) that the deposition, if taken down in writing and purporting to be signed by the Justice or coroner by or before whom it purports to have been taken, was taken in the presence of the accused or during any period when the accused, having been discharged under section 41 (1B) of the Justices Act 1902, was absent, or(ii) where the deposition is in the form of a transcript of the record made, by any means, other than writing, authorised by law for the taking of the deposition, of the matter deposed by the witness in proceedings before a Justice or coroner, that the record so made is a true record of the matter so deposed and was made in the presence of the accused or during any period when the accused, having been discharged under section 41 (1B) of the Justices Act 1902, was absent and the transcript is a correct transcript of the record so made, and(c) that the accused, or his or her counsel or attorney, had a full opportunity of cross-examining the witness, or the accused, having been discharged under section 41 (1B) of the Justices Act 1902, was absent when the deposition was taken and was not represented by counsel or attorney:Provided that no such deposition as is referred to in paragraph (b) (i) shall be so read as evidence if it be proved that it was not in fact signed by the Justice or coroner purporting to sign it.(2) The deposition of any witness called and examined before a Justice or coroner by and on behalf of the accused may, if the accused so require, be read as evidence in his or her defence at the trial whenever:(a) the witness is dead, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence without a risk of endangering the life of the witness, or is absent from Australia, or(b) the Justice or coroner who committed the accused or held him or her to bail has certified before the committal or holding to bail that the evidence of the witness is material, and that the witness is, in his or her belief, willing to attend the trial, but is unable to bear the expense of attendance.Provided that no deposition may be so read upon the ground mentioned in paragraph (b) if the witness has, in due time before the trial, been subpoenaed by the Crown.(3) Depositions taken on the preliminary or other investigation of any charge of felony or misdemeanour, may be read as evidence on the trial of the accused for any other offence, although of a higher or different nature, if they would be admissible on his or her trial for the offence in respect of which they were taken; and such depositions may be proved in the same manner as if the accused were on trial for that offence.(4) The reference in subsection (1) to “deposition” where firstly occurring and any reference in subsections (2) and (3) to “deposition” or “depositions” shall, where the deposition or depositions was or were recorded by any means, other than writing, authorised by law for the taking of the deposition or depositions, be read and construed as a reference to a transcript, certified in the manner prescribed by regulations made under the Justices Act 1902, of the deposition or depositions as so recorded.(5) For the purposes of subsection (1), unless it is proved to the contrary:(a) a deposition, or a deposition in the form of a transcript, of the evidence of a witness shall be deemed to have been taken or made in the presence of the accused, or during any period when the accused, having been discharged under section 41 (1B) of the Justices Act 1902, was absent, andif it appears from the deposition that it was so taken or made, and that the accused or his or her counsel had such an opportunity or was so absent and not represented by counsel or attorney, as the case may be.(b) the accused or his or her counsel or attorney shall be deemed to have had a full opportunity of cross-examining the witness, or the accused, having been discharged under section 41 (1B), shall be deemed to have been absent when the deposition was taken and not represented by counsel or attorney,(6) For the purposes of subsection (1) (b) (ii), where a deposition is in the form of a transcript of the record, unless it is proved to the contrary, the record shall be deemed to be a true record of the matter deposed, and the transcript shall be deemed to be a correct transcript of the record if, in the case of a transcript of a record:(a) made in shorthand notes, the transcript is identified by, and signed in the handwriting of, the person purporting to have made the shorthand notes, or(b) made by any other means (other than writing) authorised by law for the taking of a deposition, the transcript is certified in the manner prescribed by regulations made under the Justices Act 1902.(7) Except in so far as the Judge otherwise orders, a prescribed statement may be read as evidence for the prosecution at the trial of the accused upon proof on oath that the person who made the statement is dead, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence without a risk of endangering the life of the person, or is absent from Australia.(8) A prescribed statement may, if the accused so requires, be read as evidence in the accused’s defence at the trial of the accused whenever:(a) the person who made the statement is dead, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence, or so ill as not to be able to travel or to give evidence without a risk of endangering the life of the person, or is absent from Australia, orbut no statement may be so read on the ground mentioned in paragraph (b) if the person who made the statement has, in due time before the trial, been subpoenaed by the Crown.(b) the Justice who committed the accused or held the accused to bail has certified before the committal or holding to bail that the evidence of the person who made the statement is material, and that that person is, in the belief of the Justice, willing to attend the trial, but is unable to bear the expense of attendance,(9) A prescribed statement made in respect of any charge of felony or misdemeanour may be read as evidence on the trial of the accused for any other offence, although of a higher or different nature, if the contents of the statement would be admissible on the trial of the accused for the offence in respect of which it was made.(10) Where at a trial it appears to the Judge that the whole or any part of a prescribed statement is inadmissible, the Judge may reject the statement or that part, as the case may be, as evidence.(11) In this section, prescribed statement means:(a) a written statement the whole or a part of which was admitted as evidence under section 48A of the Justices Act 1902 and includes a part of any such statement rejected under section 48F of that Act, or(b) a written statement the whole or a part of which was tendered as evidence on a plea of guilty under section 51A of the Justices Act 1902.s 409: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (e); 1954 No 32, sec 3; 1955 No 16, sec 4 (b); 1971 No 70, sec 4; 1974 No 50, sec 8 (c); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (16); 1983 No 170, Schs 1 (1), 2 (2); 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (9); 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [12] [13].
409A Depositions of previous connected proceedings may be read as evidence in committal proceedings
(1) In this section:deposition has the same meaning as it has where it appears in section 409.(2) In a hearing referred to in section 41 of the Justices Act 1902, being a hearing in relation to a prescribed sexual offence, where:(a) the prescribed sexual offence is alleged to have been committed in the course of a connected set of circumstances in which another prescribed sexual offence is alleged to have been committed,(b) a person has been committed for trial in respect of, or has been convicted of, the other prescribed sexual offence, andany of the depositions of the person referred to in paragraph (c) taken at the proceedings in which the person referred to in paragraph (b) was committed or tried in respect of the other prescribed sexual offence may, in so far as they are relevant to the prescribed sexual offence the subject of the hearing, be read as evidence.(c) each of the prescribed sexual offences is alleged to have been committed on the same person,(3) Where, in a hearing referred to in subsection (2) in relation to a prescribed sexual offence, the person charged with that offence has been served with a copy of the depositions referred to in subsection (2) and has had a reasonable opportunity to examine them, the person upon whom the offence is alleged to have been committed shall not, without the leave of the Justice, be asked by or on behalf of the person so charged to give in evidence any material contained in, or to answer a question which is the same or substantially similar to a question an answer to which is contained in, a deposition which may, pursuant to subsection (2), be read as evidence.s 409A: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (15). Am 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (7).
409B Admissibility of evidence relating to sexual experience etc
(1) In this section:the accused person, in relation to any proceedings, means the person who stands, or any of the persons who stand, charged in those proceedings with a prescribed sexual offence.the complainant, in relation to any proceedings, means the person, or any of the persons, upon whom a prescribed sexual offence with which the accused person stands charged in those proceedings is alleged to have been committed.(2) In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, evidence relating to the sexual reputation of the complainant is inadmissible.(3) In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, evidence which discloses or implies that the complainant has or may have had sexual experience or a lack of sexual experience or has or may have taken part or not taken part in any sexual activity is inadmissible except:(a) where it is evidence:(i) of sexual experience or a lack of sexual experience of, or sexual activity or a lack of sexual activity taken part in by, the complainant at or about the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, and(ii) of events which are alleged to form part of a connected set of circumstances in which the alleged prescribed sexual offence was committed,(b) where it is evidence relating to a relationship which was existing or recent at the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, being a relationship between the accused person and the complainant,(c) where:(i) the accused person is alleged to have had sexual intercourse, as defined in section 61H (1), with the complainant and the accused person does not concede the sexual intercourse so alleged, and(ii) it is evidence relevant to whether the presence of semen, pregnancy, disease or injury is attributable to the sexual intercourse alleged to have been had by the accused person,(d) where it is evidence relevant to whether:(i) at the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, there was present in the complainant a disease which, at any relevant time, was absent in the accused person, or(ii) at any relevant time, there was absent in the complainant a disease which, at the time of the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence, was present in the accused person,(e) where it is evidence relevant to whether the allegation that the prescribed sexual offence was committed by the accused person was first made following a realisation or discovery of the presence of pregnancy or disease in the complainant (being a realisation or discovery which took place after the commission of the alleged prescribed sexual offence), orand its probative value outweighs any distress, humiliation or embarrassment which the complainant might suffer as a result of its admission.(f) where it is evidence given by the complainant in cross-examination by or on behalf of the accused person, being evidence given in answer to a question which may, pursuant to subsection (5), be asked,(4) In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, a witness shall not be asked:(a) to give evidence which is inadmissible under subsection (2) or (3), or(b) by or on behalf of the accused person, to give evidence which is or may be admissible under subsection (3) unless the Court or Justice has previously decided that the evidence would, if given, be admissible.(5) In prescribed sexual offence proceedings, where the Court or Justice is satisfied that:(a) it has been disclosed or implied in the case for the prosecution against the accused person that the complainant has or may have, during a specified period or without reference to any period:(i) had sexual experience, or a lack of sexual experience, of a general or specified nature, or(ii) taken part or not taken part in sexual activity of a general or specified nature, andthe complainant may be so cross-examined but only in relation to the experience or activity of the nature (if any) so specified during the period (if any) so specified.(b) the accused person might be unfairly prejudiced if the complainant could not be cross-examined by or on behalf of the accused person in relation to the disclosure or implication,(6) On the trial of a person, any question as to the admissibility of evidence under subsection (2) or (3) or the right to cross-examine under subsection (5) shall be decided by the Judge in the absence of the jury.(7) Where a Court or Justice has decided that evidence is admissible under subsection (3), the Court or Justice shall, before the evidence is given, record or cause to be recorded in writing the nature and scope of the evidence that is so admissible and the reasons for that decision.(8) Nothing in this section authorises the admission of evidence of a kind which was inadmissible immediately before the commencement of this section.s 409B: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (15). Am 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (8); 1989 No 198, Sch 1 (9).
409C, 410 (Repealed)
s 409C: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (15). Am 1987 No 184, Sch 3 (9). Rep 1994 No 26, Sch 1 (4).
s 410: Am 1954 No 3, sec 2. Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
411 Criminating statements admissible though on oath
No criminating statement by the accused, offered in evidence in any case, if the same was made voluntarily, and before any charge of felony or misdemeanour preferred against the accused, shall be rejected, because of the statement having been on oath.
412–413C (Repealed)
s 412: Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
s 413: Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
s 413A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 8 (d). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
s 413B: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 8 (d). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
s 413C: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 8 (d). Am 1986 No 218, Sch 6 (1). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
414 Evidence of previous conviction charged in an indictment
No evidence of any previous conviction, charged in an indictment, shall be offered, except in reply to evidence of character, unless the accused is convicted of the subsequent offence charged in such indictment.
414A Certificates to be evidence
(1) At any inquest or where a person is charged before a justice or justices with an indictable offence it shall not be necessary, unless so directed by the coroner or the said justice or justices, for any person who has made a scientific examination of any article or living person or body to give evidence of the result of the examination, but a certificate under the hand of such person setting out that he or she has made the examination, the nature of his or her scientific qualifications, and the facts and conclusions he or she has arrived at shall be prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.Where the certificate is tendered by the prosecutor the justice or justices shall not dispose of the case summarily except with the consent of the accused.(1A) A certificate which would, by virtue of section 4AB of the Traffic Act 1909, be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence shall be prima facie evidence of those particulars at any inquest or where a person is charged before a Magistrate or before any Court with an indictable offence.(1B) Where any certificate is admitted in evidence by virtue of subsection (1A), evidence of the accuracy or reliability of the approved radar speed measuring device to which it relates shall not be required unless evidence that the device was not accurate or not reliable has been adduced.(1C) A certificate which would, by virtue of section 4AC of the Traffic Act 1909, be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence is prima facie evidence of those particulars at any inquest or where a person is charged before a Magistrate or before any court with an indictable offence.(1D) At an inquest or where a person is charged before a Magistrate or before any court with an indictable offence:(a) a photograph tendered in evidence as a photograph taken by means of an approved camera recording device (within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909) on a specified day at a specified location is to be accepted as having been so taken unless evidence is adduced to the contrary, and(b) a photograph so taken is prima facie evidence of the matters shown or recorded on the photograph, and(c) evidence of the condition of the approved camera recording device is not required unless evidence that the device was not in proper condition has been adduced.(1E) If a photograph is tendered in evidence in proceedings referred to in subsection (1D), a certificate purporting to be signed by a member of the police force and certifying that:(a) the member is authorised by the Commissioner of Police to install and inspect approved camera recording devices (within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909), and(b) on the day recorded on the photograph as the day on which the photograph was taken, the member carried out the inspection specified in the certificate on the approved camera recording device that took the photograph, andis to be tendered in evidence in those proceedings and is prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate.(c) on that inspection the approved camera recording device was found to be operating correctly,(2) A certificate which would, by virtue of section 4E (12) (a) or (b) of the Traffic Act 1909, be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence under section 4E of that Act shall be prima facie evidence of those particulars at any inquest or where a person is charged before a stipendiary magistrate or before any Court with an indictable offence.(3) Where any certificate is admitted in evidence by virtue of subsection (2), evidence of the condition of a breath analysing instrument or the manner in which it was operated shall not be required unless evidence that the instrument was not in proper condition or was not properly operated has been adduced.(3A) A certificate which would, by virtue of section 5AB of the Traffic Act 1909 (Evidence of presence of drugs), be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence under section 5 (2) of that Act shall be prima facie evidence of those particulars:(a) at any inquest, or(b) where a person is charged before a Magistrate or before any court with an indictable offence which involved the use of a motor vehicle on a road or road related area within the meaning of that Act (other than a road or road related area that is the subject of a declaration made under section 2A (1) (b) of that Act).(3B) (Repealed)(4) A certificate which would, by virtue of section 4G of the Traffic Act 1909, be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence under section 4E of that Act shall be prima facie evidence of those particulars at any inquest or where a person is charged before a stipendiary magistrate or before any Court with an indictable offence.(4A) A certificate referred to in subsection (4) is not admissible, in proceedings under the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, as evidence of the use or administration, by the person to whom the certificate relates, of any prohibited drug within the meaning of that Act.(5) At any inquest or where a person is charged before a Magistrate or before any Court with an indictable offence:(a) a photograph tendered in evidence as a photograph taken by means of the operation, on the specified day, of an approved camera detection device (within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909) installed at a specified location for the purpose of recording any contravention of a traffic control light signal shall be deemed to have been so taken unless evidence is adduced to the contrary,(b) a photograph deemed to have been so taken shall be prima facie evidence of the matters shown or recorded on the photograph, and(c) evidence of the condition of the approved camera detection device shall not be required unless evidence that the device was not in proper condition has been adduced.(6) If a photograph is tendered in evidence in proceedings referred to in subsection (5), a certificate purporting to be signed by a member of the police force certifying that:(a) the member is authorised by the Commissioner of Police to install and inspect approved camera detection devices (within the meaning of the Traffic Act 1909),(b) on a day and at a time specified in the certificate (being within 84 hours before the time recorded on the photograph as the time at which the photograph was taken), the member carried out the inspection specified in the certificate on the approved camera detection device by means of which the photograph was taken, andshall be tendered in evidence in those proceedings and shall be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate.(c) upon that inspection, the approved camera detection device was found to be properly operating,(7) A certificate which would, by virtue of Part 5 of Schedule 4 to the Transport Administration Act 1988, be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence under Schedule 4 to that Act shall be prima facie evidence of those particulars:(a) at any inquest, or(b) where a person is charged before a magistrate or before any Court with an indictable offence.(7A) A certificate referred to in subsection (7) is not admissible, in proceedings under the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, as evidence of the use or administration, by the person to whom the certificate relates, of any prohibited drug within the meaning of that Act.(8) Where any certificate under clause 20 of Schedule 4 to the Transport Administration Act 1988 is admitted in evidence by virtue of subsection (7), evidence of the condition of a breath analysing instrument or the manner in which it was operated shall not be required unless evidence that the instrument was not in proper condition or was not properly operated has been adduced.(9) A certificate which would, by virtue of Part 3 of the Marine (Boating Safety—Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1991, be prima facie evidence of the particulars certified in and by the certificate in proceedings for an offence under that Part is prima facie evidence of those particulars:(a) at any inquest, or(b) where a person is charged before a Magistrate or before any Court with an indictable offence.(10) A certificate referred to in subsection (9) is not admissible, in proceedings under the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, as evidence of the use or administration, by the person to whom the certificate relates, of any prohibited drug within the meaning of that Act.(11) Where any certificate under section 24 (Certificate evidence of concentration of alcohol in blood determined by breath analysis) of the Marine (Boating Safety—Alcohol and Drugs) Act 1991 is admitted in evidence by virtue of subsection (9), evidence of the condition of a breath analysing instrument or the manner in which it was operated is not required unless evidence that the instrument was not in proper condition or was not properly operated has been adduced.s 414A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 18. Am 1974 No 50, sec 8 (e); 1982 No 124, Sch 1; 1986 No 162, sec 3; 1987 No 32, sec 3; 1987 No 45, Sch 1; 1987 No 294, sec 3; 1988 No 114, Sch 4; 1990 No 53, Sch 2; 1990 No 96, Sch 6; 1991 No 80, Sch 2; 1995 No 23, Sch 1.2 [14]; 1997 No 115, Sch 4.4 [5].
414B Proof of service of notice to produce
An affidavit by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Solicitor for Public Prosecutions or a member of the staff of the Director of Public Prosecutions, or by the accused or the accused’s solicitor or the accused’s solicitor’s clerk, or by any officer of police of the service of any notice to produce and of the time when it was served, with a copy of such notice annexed to such affidavit, shall be sufficient evidence of the service of the original of such notice and of the time when it was served.s 414B: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 18. Am 1986 No 212, Sch 1.
415, 416 (Repealed)
s 415: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (f). Subst 1974 No 50, sec 8 (f). Am 1978 No 25, sec 2. Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
s 416: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (g). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
417 Proof of lawful authority or excuse
Wherever, by this Act, doing a particular act or having a specified article or thing in possession without lawful authority or excuse, is made or expressed to be an offence, the proof of such authority or excuse shall lie on the accused.
418 (Repealed)
s 418: Am 1924 No 10, sec 15 (h); 1955 No 16, sec 3 (c); 1984 No 7, Sch 1 (9). Rep 1985 No 149, Sch 1 (6). Ins 1990 No 102, sec 3. Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
419 Bigamy—evidence of first marriage
On the prosecution of a person for bigamy the first marriage shall not be proved by the evidence of the husband, or wife, of such marriage alone.
419A Pilfering of goods from vessel, wharf etc
On the prosecution of any person for stealing any property in or from any vessel, barge, boat or train, or from any dock, wharf, quay, railway yard or other railway premises, or from any store or shed used in connection with and adjoining such dock, wharf, quay, railway yard or other railway premises, or in the course of transit from any vessel, barge, boat or train, or from any store or shed used in connection with and adjoining such wharf, dock, quay, railway yard or other railway premises, or for receiving any property so stolen knowing it to have been stolen, evidence may be given of any writing, printing, or marks upon the said property, or upon the packages containing the same without producing or giving notice to produce the original writing, printing, or marks; and on any such prosecution a document purporting to be the bill of lading, shipping receipt, consignment note, railway receipt, waybill, original order, delivery order, specification, schedule, packing list, or invoice relating to the said property shall be admissible in evidence on production and without further proof, and shall be evidence of the particulars contained therein, and that the ownership of the said property is in the consignee referred to therein or his or her assignee.In this section train includes any railway carriage, railway truck or other railway vehicle which is on any railway.s 419A: Ins 1918 No 35, sec 2. Am 1929 No 2, sec 11 (1); 1944 No 36, sec 3.
420 (Repealed)
s 420: Am 1974 No 50, sec 8 (g). Rep 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
421 Cases of forged English stamps
On the trial of a person for an offence under this Act relating to the stamps of the United Kingdom, any stamp, or impression, transmitted to the Governor, with a despatch purporting to be from one of Her Majesty’s Secretaries of State, as a genuine stamp, or impression of any die-plate, or instrument, provided, or used, under the direction of the Commissioners of Stamps, or other lawful authority, for the purpose of denoting any stamp duty, shall be evidence of such stamp, or impression, die-plate, or instrument.
422 Proof of coin being counterfeit
Where, on the trial of a person for an offence under this Act relating to the Queen’s current coin, it is necessary to prove that any coin is counterfeit, it shall not be necessary to prove that fact by the evidence of an officer of Her Majesty’s Mint, but it shall be sufficient to prove the same by the evidence of any other witness.
423 On trial for perjury presumption of authority to administer oath etc
On any trial for perjury, the person before whom the perjury is alleged to have been committed shall be presumed to have had authority to administer the oath, or take the declaration, or affirmation, unless the contrary is shown.
423A Joint trial in case of perjury etc
Where any two or more persons are severally indicted for perjury or false swearing and the statements alleged to be false are alleged to have been made on the same occasion and before the same tribunal and in respect of the same subject matter and are in each case to the same effect, whether in identical terms or not, all such persons may be tried together at the same time and before the same jury, provided that each person shall have his or her full right of challenge.s 423A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 19.
424 Witnesses in mitigation
After the conviction of an accused person in any case, and before sentence passed, the Court may if it sees fit, as well on application by the Crown as by or on behalf of the accused, summon witnesses and examine them on oath, in respect of any matter in extenuation of his or her offence.
424A Admission by suspects
(1) This section applies in relation to evidence of an admission within the meaning of this section.(2) Evidence of an admission is not admissible unless:(a) there is available to the court a tape recording made by an investigating official of the interview in the course of which the admission was made, or(b) if the prosecution establishes that there was a reasonable excuse as to why a tape recording referred to in paragraph (a) could not be made, there is available to the court a tape recording of an interview with the person who made the admission about the making and terms of the admission in the course of which the person states that he or she made an admission in those terms, or(c) the prosecution establishes that there was a reasonable excuse as to why the tape recordings referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) could not be made.(3) The hearsay rule and the opinion rule (within the meaning of the Evidence Act 1995) do not prevent the admission or use of a tape recording as mentioned in subsection (2).(4) In this section:admission means an admission:(a) that was made by a defendant who, at the time when the admission was made, was, or ought reasonably to have been, suspected by an investigating official of having committed an offence, and(b) that was made in the course of official questioning, and(c) that relates to an indictable offence other than an indictable offence that may be dealt with summarily without the consent of the accused.investigating official means:(a) a police officer (other than a police officer who is engaged in covert investigations under the orders of a superior), or(b) a person appointed by or under an Act (other than a person who is engaged in covert investigations under the orders of a superior) and whose functions include functions in respect of the prevention or investigation of offences, prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this definition.official questioning means questioning by an investigating official in connection with the investigation of the commission or possible commission of an offence.reasonable excuse includes:(a) a mechanical failure, or(b) the refusal of a person being questioned to have the questioning electronically recorded, or(c) the lack of availability of recording equipment within a period in which it would be reasonable to detain the person being questioned.tape recording includes:(a) audio recording, or(b) video recording, or(c) a video recording accompanied by a separately but contemporaneously recorded audio recording.(5) This section does not apply to an admission made before the commencement of this section.s 424A: Ins 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
Verdict generally
425 Conviction for misdemeanour where facts amount to felony
Where, on the trial of a person for a misdemeanour, it appears that the facts in evidence amount in law to felony, the person may notwithstanding be found guilty of and sentenced for such misdemeanour, and in that case shall not be liable to be prosecuted for felony on the same facts:Provided always, that the Court may discharge the jury from giving any verdict upon such trial, and direct the person to be indicted for felony.
426 After trial for felony, where alternative verdict possible no further prosecution
No person tried for felony, in any case where under this Act the person may be acquitted thereof but be found guilty of some other offence, shall be liable to prosecution on the same facts for any such other offence.
427 On trial for any felony or misdemeanour—verdict of attempt
Where on the trial of a person for any felony, or misdemeanour, the jury are not satisfied that the person is guilty thereof, but are satisfied that the person is guilty of an attempt to commit, or of an assault with intent to commit, the same, they may acquit the person of the offence charged, and find the person guilty of such attempt, or assault, and the person shall be liable to punishment accordingly.
428 (Repealed)
s 428, hdg: Rep 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (17).
s 428: Rep 1912 No 16, sec 23 (2).
Part 11A Intoxication
pt 11A: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428A Definitions
In this Part:drug includes a drug within the meaning of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 and a poison, restricted substance or drug of addiction within the meaning of the Poisons Act 1966.intoxication means intoxication because of the influence of alcohol, a drug or any other substance.offence includes an attempt to commit the offence.offence of specific intent is defined in section 428B.relevant conduct means an act or omission necessary to constitute the actus reus of an offence.self-induced intoxication means any intoxication except intoxication that:(a) is involuntary, or(b) results from fraud, sudden or extraordinary emergency, accident, reasonable mistake, duress or force, or(c) results from the administration of a drug for which a prescription is required in accordance with the prescription of a medical practitioner or dentist, or of a drug for which no prescription is required administered for the purpose, and in accordance with the dosage level recommended, in the manufacturer’s instructions.s 428A: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428B Offences of specific intent to which Part applies
(1) An offence of specific intent is an offence of which an intention to cause a specific result is an element.(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the offences referred to in the Table to this section are examples of offences of specific intent.Table(a) an offence under the following provisions of this Act:
19A Murder 27 Acts done to the person with intent to murder 28 Acts done to property with intent to murder 29 Certain other attempts to murder 30 Attempts to murder by other means 33 Wounding etc, with intent to do bodily harm or resist arrest 33A Discharging loaded arms with intent 33B Use of weapon to resist arrest etc 36 Causing a grievous bodily disease 37 Attempts to choke etc (garrotting) 38 Using chloroform etc to commit an offence 41 Administering poison etc with intent to injure or annoy 41A Poisoning etc of water supply 47 Using etc explosive substance or corrosive fluid etc 48 Placing gunpowder near a building etc 49 Setting trap etc 55 Possessing etc gunpowder etc with intent to injure the person 61K Assault with intent to have sexual intercourse 82 Administering drugs etc to herself by woman with child 83 Administering drugs etc to woman with intent 86 Abduction of woman against her will 87 The like against the will of parent etc 89 Forcible abduction of a woman 90A Kidnapping 99 Demanding money with intent to steal 100A Blackmail by threat to publish etc 101 Threatening letters 102 Accusing or threatening to accuse of crime to extort money etc 103 Causing a person by violence or threats to execute deeds etc 110 Breaking, entering and assaulting with intent to murder etc 111 Entering dwelling-house 113 Breaking etc into any house etc with intent to commit felony 114 (a) (c) (d) Being armed etc with intent to commit offence 158 Destruction, falsification of accounts etc by clerk or servant 172 Trustees fraudulently disposing of property 174 Directors etc omitting certain entries 175 Director etc wilfully destroying etc books of company etc 176 Director or officer publishing fraudulent statements 178BB Obtaining money etc by false or misleading statements 179 False pretences etc 180 Causing payment etc by false pretences etc 181 False pretence of title 184 Fraudulent personation 185 Inducing persons by fraud to execute instruments 190 Receiving etc cattle feloniously killed, or carcass etc 196 Maliciously destroying or damaging property with intent to injure a person 198 Maliciously destroying or damaging property with the intention of endangering life 199 Threatening to destroy or damage property 200 Possession, custody or control of an article with intent to destroy or damage property 202 (c) Interfering or damaging etc bed or bank of river with intent of obstructing etc navigation 205 Prejudicing the safe operation of an aircraft or vessel 210 (b) Acting with intention of destroying etc aids to navigation 211 Criminal acts relating to railways 249C Misleading documents or statements used or made by agents 249D Corrupt inducements for advice 298 Demanding property on forged instruments 300 Making or using false instruments 301 Making or using copies of false instruments 302 Custody of false instruments etc 302A Making or possession of implements for making false instruments 309 (2) Unlawful access to data in computer 314 False accusations etc 315 Hindering investigation etc 317 Tampering etc with evidence 318 Making or using false official instrument to pervert the course of justice 319 General offence of perverting the course of justice 321 (1) Corruption of witnesses and jurors 322 Threatening or intimidating judges, witnesses, jurors etc 323 Influencing witnesses and jurors 328 Perjury with intent to procure conviction or acquittal 333 (2) Subornation of perjury(b) an offence under the following provisions of this Act to the extent that an element of the offence requires a person to intend to cause the specific result necessary for the offence:
57 (assault on persons preserving wreck) 58 (assault with intent to commit felony on certain officers) 66B (assaulting with intent to have sexual intercourse with child under 10) 66D (assaulting with intent to have sexual intercourse with child between 10 and 16) 78I (assault with intent to have homosexual intercourse with male under 10) 78L (assault with intent to have homosexual intercourse with male between 10 and 18) 78O (assault with intent to have homosexual intercourse with pupil etc) 91 (taking child with intent to steal) 94 (assault with intent to rob person) 95 (assault with intent to rob in circumstances of aggravation) 96 (assault with intent to rob with wounding) 97 (assault with intent to rob with arms) 98 (assault with intent to rob) 109 (entering with intent, or stealing etc in dwelling-house and breaking out) 126 (killing with intent to steal) 139 (destroys, damages, breaks with intent to steal) 140 (destroys, damages, breaks with intent to steal) 197 (dishonestly destroying or damaging property with a view to gain) 204 (destruction of, or damage to, an aircraft or vessel with intent)(c) any other offence by or under any law (including the common law) prescribed by the regulations.s 428B: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1986 No 93, Sch 1 (1). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.s 428B, tbl: Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1. Am 1996 No 137, Sch 2.3 [3] [4].
428C Intoxication in relation to offences of specific intent
(1) Evidence that a person was intoxicated (whether by reason of self-induced intoxication or otherwise) at the time of the relevant conduct may be taken into account in determining whether the person had the intention to cause the specific result necessary for an offence of specific intent.(2) However, such evidence cannot be taken into account if the person:(a) had resolved before becoming intoxicated to do the relevant conduct, or(b) became intoxicated in order to strengthen his or her resolve to do the relevant conduct.s 428C: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428D Intoxication in relation to other offences
In determining whether a person had the mens rea for an offence other than an offence of specific intent, evidence that a person was intoxicated at the time of the relevant conduct:(a) if the intoxication was self-induced—cannot be taken into account, or(b) if the intoxication was not self-induced—may be taken into account.s 428D: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428E Intoxication in relation to murder and manslaughter
If evidence of intoxication at the time of the relevant conduct results in a person being acquitted of murder:(a) in the case of intoxication that was self-induced—evidence of that intoxication cannot be taken into account in determining whether the person had the requisite mens rea for manslaughter, or(b) in the case of intoxication that was not self-induced—evidence of that intoxication may be taken into account in determining whether the person had the requisite mens rea for manslaughter.s 428E: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1988 No 20, Sch 2 (1). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428F Intoxication in relation to the reasonable person test
If, for the purposes of determining whether a person is guilty of an offence, it is necessary to compare the state of mind of the person with that of a reasonable person, the comparison is to be made between the conduct or state of mind of the person and that of a reasonable person who is not intoxicated.s 428F: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1988 No 20, Sch 2 (2). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428G Intoxication and the actus reus of an offence
(1) In determining whether a person has committed an offence, evidence that the intoxication was self-induced cannot be taken into account in determining whether the relevant conduct was voluntary.(2) However, a person is not criminally responsible for an offence if the relevant conduct resulted from intoxication that was not self-induced.ss 428G–428I: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428H Abolition of common law relating to self-induced intoxication
The common law relating to the effect of intoxication on criminal liability is abolished.ss 428G–428I: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428I Application of Part
This Part applies to any offence (whether under this Act or otherwise) committed after the commencement of this Part.ss 428G–428I: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2. Ins 1996 No 6, Sch 1.
428J–428YB (Repealed)
s 428J: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428K: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1986 No 212, Sch 1. Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428L: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428M: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1986 No 212, Sch 1 (am 1987 No 209, Sch 44); 1988 No 20, Sch 2 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
ss 428N–428O: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428P: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428Q: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428R: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428S: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1986 No 212, Sch 1. Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428T: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
pt 11A, ch 2, hdg: Subst 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428U: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (4). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428V: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1987 No 273, Sch. Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428W: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1986 No 93, Sch 1 (2); 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (5). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428X: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Am 1986 No 218, Sch 6 (2); 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (6); 1990 No 46, Sch 2. Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428XA: Ins 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (7). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 428Y: Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
pt 11A, ch 3 (ss 428YA, 428YB): Ins 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (8). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
pt 11A, ch 3 (ss 428YA, 428YB): Ins 1989 No 100, Sch 1 (8). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
Part 11B
428Z–428ZB (Repealed)
pt 11B (ss 428Z–428ZB): Ins 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (3). Rep 1990 No 11, Sch 2.
s 429, hdg: Rep 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (18).
s 429: Am 1924 No 10, sec 20; 1939 No 17, sec 181. Rep 1951 No 31, sec 3 (c).
Part 12 Sentences
429 (Repealed)
Sentences of death
430 (Repealed)
s 430: Rep 1955 No 16, sec 5 (k).
431 Convicted persons not to be liable to death penalty
(1) This section applies to offences under:(a) an Act,(b) an Imperial Act so far as it applies in New South Wales, orwhether committed before or after the commencement of the Crimes (Death Penalty Abolition) Amendment Act 1985.(c) a rule of law,(2) A person is not liable to the punishment of death for an offence to which this section applies.(3) Where, but for this subsection, no penalty would be provided for an offence to which this section applies that was formerly punishable by death, that offence shall be punishable by penal servitude for 25 years.s 431: Am 1955 No 16, sec 5 (l). Subst 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (5). Am 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (26).
431A Life sentences
(1) This section applies to offences under:(a) an Act, or(b) an Imperial Act so far as it applies in New South Wales, or(c) a rule of law.(2) A person is not liable to the punishment of penal servitude for life for any offence to which this section applies except for the offence of murder or for an offence carrying that punishment under the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.(3) Where, but for this subsection, no penalty would be provided for an offence to which this section applies that was formerly punishable by penal servitude for life, that offence is punishable by penal servitude for 25 years.(4) This section applies to offences committed before or after the commencement of this section. However, this section does not apply where committal proceedings (or proceedings by way of ex officio indictment) for the offence were instituted against the convicted person before the commencement of this section.(5) Any amendment made by the Crimes (Life Sentences) Amendment Act 1989 altering the penalty for an offence under this Act from penal servitude for life to penal servitude for 25 years applies to an offence committed before or after the commencement of the amendment. However, the amendment does not apply where committal proceedings (or proceedings by way of ex officio indictment) for the offence were instituted against the convicted person before the commencement of the amendment.(6) A reference in this section to penal servitude includes a reference to imprisonment.s 431A: Ins 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (27).
431B Mandatory life sentences for certain offences
(1) A court is to impose a sentence of penal servitude for life on a person who is convicted of murder, if the court is satisfied that the level of culpability in the commission of the offence is so extreme that the community interest in retribution, punishment, community protection and deterrence can only be met through the imposition of that sentence.(2) A court is to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life on a person who is convicted of an offence under section 25 (2) or (2A) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 to which section 33 (subsection (2) excepted) of that Act applies involving heroin or cocaine if the court is satisfied that the level of culpability in the commission of the offence is so extreme that the community interest in retribution, punishment, community protection and deterrence can only be met through the imposition of that sentence and the court is also satisfied that:(a) the offence involved:(i) a high degree of planning and organisation, and(ii) the use of other people acting at the direction of the person convicted of the offence in the commission of the offence, and(b) the person was solely or principally responsible for planning, organising and financing the offence, and(c) the heroin or cocaine was of a high degree of purity, and(d) the person committed the offence solely for financial reward.(3) Nothing in subsection (1) affects section 442.(4) Section 442 of this Act and section 33A (2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 do not apply if the court is satisfied that the circumstances referred to in subsection (2) exist.(5) Nothing in subsection (2) limits or derogates from the discretion of a court to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life on a person who is convicted of an offence under section 25 (2) or (2A) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 to which section 33 (subsection (2) excepted) of that Act applies involving heroin or cocaine.(6) This section does not apply to a person who was less than 18 years of age at the date of commission of the offence.(7) This section does not apply to offences committed before the commencement of this section.(8) In this section, heroin has the same meaning as in the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.s 431B: Ins 1996 No 5, Sch 1.
Sentences of imprisonment—hard labour—solitary confinement—and sureties
432 Misdemeanours
(1) Where any offender is sentenced to imprisonment, whether for a misdemeanour at common law, or under this or any other Act, or Imperial Act, he shall be kept, if a male, to hard labour, and if a female, to light labour, unless the court shall in and by the sentence otherwise direct.(2) The court may, in the sentence, also require the offender to enter into a recognizance, with or without sureties, for keeping the peace and being of good behaviour for a term not exceeding three years:Provided that no person shall be imprisoned under this Act more than one year for not finding sureties.s 432: Subst 1924 No 10, sec 21 (a).
433–437A (Repealed)
s 433: Rep 1924 No 10, sec 21 (a).
s 434 and hdg: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 9 (a).
s 435: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 9 (b).
s 436: Rep 1951 No 31, sec 3 (d).
s 437, hdg: Rep 1987 No 238, Sch 1.
s 437: Am 1924 No 10, sec 21 (b); 1951 No 59, sec 4 (a); 1967 No 14, sec 8 (a); 1974 No 50, sec 9 (c); 1979 No 101, Sch 1 (1); 1980 No 53, Sch 1 (6); 1982 No 81, Sch 1 (5) (rep). Subst 1984 No 70, Sch 1 (1). Am 1986 No 212, Sch 1. Rep 1987 No 238, Sch 1.
s 437A, hdg: Rep 1987 No 238, Sch 1.
s 437A: Ins 1974 No 50, sec 9 (d). Am 1984 No 70, Sch 1 (2). Rep 1987 No 238, Sch 1.
Order for restitution of property stolen, &c
438 Restitution of property stolen in certain cases
(1) Where a person is convicted under this Act of stealing, embezzling, or receiving property, the Court may order the restitution thereof, in a summary manner, to the owner, or the owner’s representative.(2) Where any person indicted for any such offence is acquitted, the Court in its discretion, on being satisfied that any property mentioned in the indictment has been stolen, embezzled, or received, contrary to this Act, may order in like manner the restitution of such property.(3) Where any valuable security has been paid by some person liable to the payment thereof, or, being a negotiable instrument, has been taken for a valuable consideration, without notice, or cause to suspect, that the same had been dishonestly come by, the Court shall not order such restitution.(4) This section shall equally apply to property in any manner taken, or otherwise acquired, received, retained, or disposed of, in violation of any provision of this Act.
Guilty pleas
439 Guilty plea to be taken into account
s 439, hdg: Rep 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (4) (a). Ins 1990 No 5, sec 3 (b).(1) In passing sentence for an offence on a person who pleaded guilty to the offence, a Court must take into account:(a) the fact that the person pleaded guilty, andand may accordingly reduce the sentence that it would otherwise have passed.(b) when the person pleaded guilty or indicated an intention to plead guilty,(2) A Court which does not, as a result of this section, reduce the sentence that it passes on a person who pleaded guilty to an offence must state that fact and its reasons for not reducing the sentence when passing sentence.(3) The failure of a Court to comply with this section does not invalidate any sentence imposed by the Court.(4) In this section, a reference to a Court includes a reference to a Judge and a Magistrate (whether exercising jurisdiction in respect of an indictable offence or a summary offence) but does not include a reference to the Children’s Court or a court exercising the jurisdiction of the Children’s Court.(5) This section applies to proceedings for an offence whether commenced before or after the commencement of this section.(6) This section also applies, and is taken always to have applied, where an order for a re-trial has been made or proceedings have been reopened.s 439: Rep 1983 No 180, Sch 1 (4) (b). Ins 1990 No 5, sec 3 (b). Am 1993 No 46, Sch 1.
Sentences for statutory offences
440 Statutory offences
Whosoever is convicted of an offence not punishable with death, shall be punished in the manner prescribed by the statute relating thereto, and where no punishment is specially provided, shall be liable to penal servitude for five years.
Power to fine in certain cases
440A (Repealed)
s 440A, hdg: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 4 (c).
s 440A: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 4 (c). Am 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (19). Rep 1989 No 198, Sch 2 (2).
440AA Power to fine
(1) If a person is convicted on indictment of an offence, the Judge before whom the person is brought for sentencing may, in addition to or instead of imposing any other punishment, impose a fine not exceeding 1,000 penalty units.(2) This section does not apply where:(a) another provision empowers the imposition of a fine for the offence, or(b) the offence was committed before the commencement of this section and a sentence of penal servitude or imprisonment is also being imposed for the offence.(3), (4) (Repealed)s 440AA: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 2 (3). Am 1992 No 112, Sch 1; 1996 No 99, Sch 2.5 [1] [2].
440AB–440B (Repealed)
s 440AB: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 2 (3). Rep 1996 No 99, Sch 2.5 [3].
s 440AC: Ins 1989 No 198, Sch 2 (3). Rep 1996 No 99, Sch 2.5 [4].
s 440B: Ins 1967 No 77, sec 3. Am 1974 No 50, sec 9 (c); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (20) (am 1984 No 153, Sch 16); 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (6); 1985 No 231, Sch 31; 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (9); 1989 No 198, Sch 2 (4); 1989 No 218, Sch 1 (28); 1992 No 112, Sch 1. Rep 1996 No 99, Sch 2.5 [5].
Deferred sentences
441 Judgment after sentence deferred
Where a person is convicted of an offence and sentence is deferred, the Court before which the person was tried or any other court of like jurisdiction, or the Supreme Court, may pronounce judgment against the person at any time afterwards.s 441: Am 1951 No 31, sec 6 (c); 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (7).
Commencement of sentence
441A Time from which sentences shall take effect
For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that every sentence passed shall take effect from the time when it is passed, unless the Court otherwise directs.s 441A and hdg: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 4 (d).
Reduction of sentence or fine below term or amount fixed
442 Provision for passing sentences of less duration than those fixed
(1) Where by any section of this Act an offender is made liable to penal servitude for life or to penal servitude or imprisonment for a fixed term, the judge may nevertheless pass a sentence of either penal servitude or imprisonment of less duration.Nothing in this subsection shall prevent the awarding of hard labour or solitary confinement, where at present authorised by law, or the directing of the offender to enter into recognizances to keep the peace and be of good behaviour.(2) Where by any section of this Act an offender is made liable to a fine of any fixed amount, the judge may nevertheless inflict a fine of less amount.s 442: Subst 1924 No 10, sec 21 (c). Am 1974 No 50, sec 9 (f).
442A Circumstances of certain sexual offences to be considered in passing sentence
Where a person is convicted of an offence under section 61B or 61C and an offence under section 61D, whether at the same time or at different times, the Judge passing sentence on the person in respect of the 2 convictions or the later of the 2 convictions, as the case may be, shall, if it appears that the 2 offences arose substantially out of the one set of circumstances, take that fact into account in passing sentence.s 442A: Ins 1981 No 42, Sch 1 (16).
442B Reduction of sentences for assistance to authorities
(1) In determining the sentence to be passed on a person convicted of an offence, a court may reduce the sentence it would otherwise impose, having regard to the degree to which the person has assisted, or undertaken to assist, law enforcement authorities in the prevention, detection or investigation of, or in proceedings relating to, the offence or other offences.(2) A court must not reduce a sentence so that the sentence becomes unreasonably disproportionate to the nature and circumstances of the offence.(3) In deciding whether to reduce a sentence and the extent of any reduction, the court is required to consider the following matters:(a) the effect of the offence for which the offender is being sentenced on the victim or victims of the offence and the family or families of the victim or victims,(b) the significance and usefulness of the offender’s assistance to the authority or authorities concerned, taking into consideration any evaluation by the authority or authorities of the assistance rendered or undertaken to be rendered,(c) the truthfulness, completeness and reliability of any information or evidence provided by the offender,(d) the nature and extent of the offender’s assistance or promised assistance,(e) the timeliness of the assistance or undertaking to assist,(f) any benefits that the offender has gained or may gain by reason of the assistance or undertaking to assist,(g) whether the offender will suffer harsher custodial conditions,(h) any injury suffered by the offender or the offender’s family, or any danger or risk of injury to the offender or the offender’s family, resulting from the assistance or the undertaking to assist,(i) whether the assistance or promised assistance concerns the offence for which the offender is being sentenced or an unrelated offence,(j) the likelihood that the offender will commit further offences after release.(4) Nothing in this section precludes a court from considering any other matter that the court is required to consider or that the court considers it is appropriate to consider in sentencing an offender or in deciding to reduce a sentence and the extent of any reduction.(5) In this section, a reference to a court includes a reference to a Judge and a Magistrate (whether exercising jurisdiction in respect of an indictable offence or a summary offence).s 442B: Ins 1992 No 2, Sch 1 (10).
Additional and cumulative sentences
443 Additional sentences on second or third convictions
In every case where, on the conviction of a person of an offence punishable under this Act, it is made to appear to the Judge that the offender has been previously convicted of, and sentenced for, an indictable offence, under this or any former Act, such Judge may sentence the person to a term of punishment, in addition to that prescribed for the offence of which the person then stands convicted.Such additional punishment shall be:(1) Where the offence of which the person then stands convicted is a felony:(a) if the person has been once previously so convicted and sentenced—penal servitude for ten years, or not less than two years,(b) if the person has been twice or oftener previously so convicted and sentenced—penal servitude for fourteen years, or not less than three years.(2) Where the offence of which the person then stands convicted is a misdemeanour—imprisonment for eighteen months, or not less than six months.
444 Cumulative or concurrent sentences
(1) Subject to subsection (3), where a person is convicted of any offence, and at the time of passing sentence the term of any sentence previously passed on the person, whether of penal servitude, or imprisonment, is unexpired, the Judge or magistrate may, whether or not that person has commenced to serve that unexpired term, direct that the sentence for the offence of which such person then stands convicted shall commence:(a) at the expiration of the period of such unexpired sentence, or(b) where any sentence previously passed on that person commences on or after the day on which the person so stands convicted, at the expiration of the period of any such sentence.(1A) Where, upon the same indictment or otherwise, a person is convicted of two or more offences, the Judge or magistrate may direct that the sentences imposed in respect of the convictions shall be served consecutively, in which case the term of each sentence so imposed, other than:(a) a sentence in respect of which a direction has been given under subsection (1), orshall commence at the expiration of the period of the sentence imposed immediately before it.(b) where no direction under that subsection has been given, the first sentence imposed,(2) Except to the extent that the Judge or magistrate otherwise directs under subsection (1) or (1A), or where the Judge or magistrate directs that subsection (3) shall not apply, a sentence imposed upon a person in the circumstances referred to in those subsections, and an unexpired sentence then being served by that person, shall be concurrent.(3) Where a person is convicted of assault or any other offence against the person of another and, at the time of the assault or such other offence the person so convicted was serving a sentence of penal servitude or imprisonment the term of which is unexpired at the time the person is sentenced for the person’s conviction of the assault or other offence, the sentence for that conviction shall, unless the Judge or magistrate directs that this subsection shall not apply thereto, commence:(a) at the expiration of the period of such unexpired sentence, or(b) where any sentence previously passed on that person commences on or after the day on which the person so stands convicted, at the expiration of the period of that sentence or, if there is more than one such sentence, at the expiration of the period of the sentence that last expires.(4) Notwithstanding anything in this section, except subsection (5), a magistrate, whether dealing with an offence or offences under section 476 or otherwise, shall not impose, or make an order having the effect of imposing, on any offender:(a) more than one sentence of imprisonment or penal servitude to be served consecutively on any other sentence of imprisonment or penal servitude then imposed on, or being served by, the offender, or(b) sentences of imprisonment or penal servitude, to be served consecutively, totalling more than three years.(5) Where a person is serving a sentence of penal servitude or imprisonment at the time of his or her conviction by a magistrate in respect of 1 or more offences which are committed after the commencement of this subsection and which involved an assault on a prison officer while in the execution of his or her duty, the magistrate may:(a) whether or not the person is being dealt with under section 476,(b) whether or not the sentence being served is cumulative on other sentences already served,(c) whether or not the person is liable to serve a cumulative sentence or cumulative sentences of penal servitude or imprisonment on the expiration of the sentence being served, anddirect that the sentence for the offence or for 1 only of the offences, as the case may be, of which the person then stands convicted shall commence, in the case referred to in paragraph (d) (i), at the expiration of the sentence being served or, in the case referred to in paragraph (d) (ii), at the expiration of the last of the sentences to be served.(d) if:(i) in a case where the person is not liable to serve a cumulative sentence or cumulative sentences on the expiration of the sentence being served—the sentence being served, orwas imposed by a Judge,(ii) in a case where the person is liable to serve a cumulative sentence or cumulative sentences on the expiration of the sentence being served—the last of the sentences to be served,(6) This section applies in relation to unexpired sentences passed outside New South Wales and being served or to be served within New South Wales in the same way as it applies in relation to unexpired sentences passed within New South Wales.s 444: Am 1967 No 77, sec 4 (a); 1974 No 50, sec 9 (g); 1980 No 53, Sch 1 (7); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (10).
445 Proof of previous conviction
Any previous conviction and sentence referred to in section 444 may be proved by a certificate admissible in evidence under section 178 (Convictions, acquittals and other judicial proceedings) of the Evidence Act 1995, or other evidence together with evidence of the identity of the offender to the satisfaction of the Judge:Provided that where an offender is convicted of an offence and sentenced for the same, and is in the same Court, and during the same sittings, convicted a second time or oftener, judicial notice may be taken of every such previous conviction and sentence.s 445: Am 1967 No 77, sec 4 (b); 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (21); 1995 No 27, Sch 1.
446 Previous sentences to be noted in new sentence
Whenever an additional, or cumulative, sentence is passed as aforesaid, the fact of the previous sentence, or sentences, specifying the date, or dates, thereof, and of the term, or terms, of sentence shall be entered on the minutes and record of the sentence lastly passed.
447 (Repealed)
s 447: Rep 1967 No 77, sec 4 (c).
447A Punishment on escape
Whosoever escapes from lawful custody while undergoing a sentence involving deprivation of liberty, shall be liable upon recapture to undergo the punishment which he or she was undergoing at the time of his or her escape, for a term equal to that during which he or she was absent from prison after the escape and before the expiration of the term of his or her original sentence, whether at the time of his or her recapture the term of that sentence has or has not expired, in addition to any punishment which may be awarded for the escape.s 447A: Ins 1924 No 10, sec 21 (d).
447B (Repealed)
s 447B, hdg: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 4 (e). Rep 1989 No 40, Sch 2 (2).
s 447B: Ins 1955 No 16, sec 4 (e). Am 1980 No 53, Schs 1 (8), 2 (22); 1987 No 48, Sch 4 (11). Rep 1989 No 40, Sch 2 (2).
s 448, hdg: Rep 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (8) (a).
ss 448–450: Rep 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (8) (b).
s 451: Am 1937 No 35, Second Sch; 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (23). Rep 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (8) (b).
s 452: Rep 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (8) (b).
s 453, hdg: Rep 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (24).
s 453: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 10 (a).
s 454: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 10 (b).
s 455 and hdg: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 10 (c).
s 456: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 10 (d).
s 457, hdg: Rep 1987 No 238, Sch 1.
s 457: Am 1970 No 52, Second Sch (am 1972 No 41, Second Sch). Subst 1974 No 50, sec 10 (e). Am 1984 No 70, Sch 1 (3); 1986 No 212, Sch 1. Rep 1987 No 238, Sch 1.
Part 13 Proceedings after sentence
(A) EXECUTION OF SENTENCE
448–457 (Repealed)
Sentences of Courts-martial
458 Sentences by Courts-martial under Imperial Acts
In all cases where, under an Imperial Act now or hereafter passed, relating to Her Majesty’s land or sea forces, the Supreme Court, or a Judge thereof, is authorised to carry into effect a sentence of penal servitude, or any commutation of a capital sentence, passed by a Court-martial on any soldier, marine, or seaman, and an order is accordingly made by such Court, or Judge, such sentence or commutation shall be carried into effect according to the terms of such order, under the provisions of this Act so far as it can be applied, and, subject thereto, this Act shall apply to every such sentence or commutation and to every such soldier, marine, or seaman.
(B) COMMUTATION OR MITIGATION OF SENTENCES
459–463 (Repealed)
s 459: Am 1974 No 50, sec 10 (f). Rep 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (9).
s 460: Rep 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (9).
s 460A: Ins 1986 No 44, sec 3. Rep 1986 No 189, Sch 1 (1).
s 461: Am 1985 No 58, Sch 1 (10). Rep 1986 No 189, Sch 1 (2).
s 462: Am 1983 No 131, Sch 1 (1). Rep 1986 No 189, Sch 1 (3).
s 463: Am 1924 No 10, sec 22; 1929 No 2, sec 11 (2) (a) (b); 1951 No 31, Sch; 1983 No 131, Sch 1 (2); 1986 No 36, Sch 1. Rep 1989 No 219, sec 5.
464 Remissions where more than one sentence
Where an offender is under more than one sentence of penal servitude, or imprisonment, and one of such sentences is duly vacated, avoided or remitted, the remaining sentences, or sentence, shall take effect and be computed on and from the day of such vacation, avoidance, or remission, or such earlier day as the Governor shall direct.s 464: Am 1986 No 189, Sch 1 (4).
464A (Repealed)
s 464A: Ins 1950 No 36, sec 2. Rep 1966 No 41, sec 1 (3) (a).
(C) CONSEQUENCES, &c, OF CONVICTION FOR FELONY
465 Forfeiture in felonies abolished
(1) No inquest, conviction, or judgment, in respect of any felony, shall cause any escheat or forfeiture of lands or goods.(2) There shall be no forfeiture of any chattel which may have moved to, or caused, the death of any human being for or in respect of such death.
466 Disabilities of felony
After the conviction of an offender for any felony, until he or she has endured the punishment to which he or she was sentenced, or the punishment, if any, substituted for the same, or the unremitted portion of such punishment, or has received a free pardon for his or her offence, he or she shall be incapable of holding, or being elected or appointed to any office, or of exercising any electoral or municipal franchise.
467 (Repealed)
s 467: Rep 1974 No 50, sec 10 (g).
468 Effect of reversing judgment in such cases
Upon the avoidance or vacating of the conviction of any such person, or reversal of the judgment against him or her, the provisions of sections 437, 457 and 466, shall, with respect to such person, determine, and every order made for the payment of money out of the person’s property shall become of no effect, and he or she shall be restored to all that he or she may have lost thereby.s 468: Am 1951 No 31, Sch; 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (25).
469–474 (Repealed)
s 469: Rep 1970 No 52, Second Sch.
ss 470–474, hdgs: Rep 1980 No 53, Sch 2 (26).
ss 470–474: Rep 1912 No 16, sec 23